NCT07366619

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to see if a new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner could give additional information or help view the body in a different way. The new scanner may be useful to diagnose conditions affecting tissues such as ligaments, tendons and cartilage more accurately, potentially improving the quality of care by the NHS. To develop such protocols and to test the clinical capabilities of the scanner, it is necessary to evaluate the scans of healthy volunteers before recruiting patient participants. Conventional MRI scans are unable to detect the signal from tissues such as ligaments, tendons, cartilage and cortical bone, which contain highly aligned collagen fibres and the signal decays too quickly to be captured. These tissues appear black and are only seen because of the surrounding brighter tissues. If a bright region appears, it can be a sign of an injury or disease, but it can also appear due to the Magic Angle artefacts, when the collagen fibres are at a specific angle to the main magnetic field of the MR scanner. This anomaly can make assessment of these tissues difficult. Currently the diagnostic gold standard is arthroscopy, though it is mostly undertaken therapeutically. The method harnesses this inherent tissue property to gain information about these collagen-rich tissues in joints. Using Magic Angle Direction Imaging (MADI) it is possible to obtain detailed information about the collagen fibre structures, and this is not available using conventional MRI. MADI could be important for planning surgery, developing new tissue implants, and monitoring outcome measures. In both standard cylindrical scanner and the conventional open scanner, it is impossible to move the magnet, nor the patient, in the required manner. This motivated the development of a novel prototype MA scanner that can move around the patient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability to routinely perform in-vivo Magic Angle-MRI of collagen structures in joints based on the magic angle principle, and to assess the ability to use qualitative and quantitative assessment of the Magic Angle-MR images to distinguish between the pathologies of the soft structures imaged.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
14mo left

Started Jan 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Jan 2025Jun 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 29, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 5, 2026

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2026

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2027

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

January 5, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

magic anglemusculoskeletallow fieldmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)kneeACLdegenerative meniscuspatellar tendonmagic angle directional imaging (MADI)short T2collagen fibre orientation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Reproducibility with Magic Angle MRI

    The primary outcome measures will be the reproducibility with MA-MRI in a group of patients with known ACL tears. We will use a grading system for the radiologists to assess the MA-MRI images through a) qualitative assessment to grade ACL fibres and b) quantitative assessments to distinguish between the ACL tears with a grading system for the radiologists. 1. Visual grading of the anterior cruciate ligament fibres will be assessed (range 1-5) as follows: * 1 = not seen * 2 = probably seen * 3 = seen * 4 = readily seen * 5 = well seen 2. Visual grading of the ACL structure for patients with ligament tear will be assessed as per the table below. * 1 = no tear 0% * 2 = partial tear - low grade up to 49% * 3 = partial tear - high grade over 50% * 4 = complete tear 100%

    Before surgery and 12 months after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of the ACLs imaged with MA-MRI against best practice

    12 months after surgery

Study Arms (1)

Patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI for investigation for ACL injury

Patients will be recruited from ICHT orthopaedic / sports medicine clinic who have suffered an ACL injury who have also undergone clinically indicated MRI

Diagnostic Test: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Interventions

Patients will be scanned in a prototype MRI scanner at several orientations of the MRI magnet relative to the body.

Also known as: Magic Angle Directional Imaging (MADI)
Patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI for investigation for ACL injury

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Before a patient can enter the study, they will have undergone a clinically indicated MRI for knee pathology which diagnosed an ACL injury requiring surgery.

You may qualify if:

  • adults aged 18 - 65 years
  • selected for ligament repair surgery
  • ability to give informed consent, either written or e-consent
  • no contraindications to MRI
  • BMI ≤ 28 or thigh circumference less than 47 cm at approximately 7.5cm above the joint line

You may not qualify if:

  • acutely unwell or frail patients in whom extension of scanning time may not be tolerated or may delay treatment
  • contraindications to MRI
  • participants who are too big to be able to fit in the prototype scanner
  • recent surgery to the affected joint
  • severe pain
  • pregnant and/or breastfeeding participants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Imperial College London

London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Imperial College NHS Trust, Department of Surgery and Cancer

London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp SL, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112625. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25390896BACKGROUND
  • Amin NH, Hussain W, Ryan J, Morrison S, Miniaci A, Jones MH. Changes Within Clinical Practice After a Randomized Controlled Trial of Knee Arthroscopy for Osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 10;5(4):2325967117698439. doi: 10.1177/2325967117698439. eCollection 2017 Apr.

    PMID: 28451610BACKGROUND
  • Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA. Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology. 1985 May;155(2):433-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.155.2.3983395.

    PMID: 3983395BACKGROUND
  • Fullerton GD, Rahal A. Collagen structure: the molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):345-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20808.

    PMID: 17260393BACKGROUND
  • Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):290-300. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20850.

    PMID: 17260400BACKGROUND
  • Du J, Pak BC, Znamirowski R, Statum S, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;27(4):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

    PMID: 19022600BACKGROUND
  • Szeverenyi NM, Bydder GM. Dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging in a goat knee meniscus. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Feb;65(2):463-70. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22645. Epub 2010 Oct 11.

    PMID: 20939091BACKGROUND
  • Bydder GM. Review. The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T(2) and T(2)* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems. Br J Radiol. 2011 Dec;84(1008):1067-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74368403.

    PMID: 22101579BACKGROUND
  • McGinley JV, Ristic M, Young IR. A permanent MRI magnet for magic angle imaging having its field parallel to the poles. J Magn Reson. 2016 Oct;271:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

    PMID: 27552556BACKGROUND
  • Jones GMC, Pitsillides AA, Meeson RL. Moving Beyond the Limits of Detection: The Past, the Present, and the Future of Diagnostic Imaging in Canine Osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 15;9:789898. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789898. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35372534BACKGROUND
  • Brujic D, Chappell KE, Ristic M. Accuracy of collagen fibre estimation under noise using directional MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Dec;86:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101796. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

    PMID: 33069034BACKGROUND
  • Chappell KE, Brujic D, Van Der Straeten C, Meeson R, Gedroyc W, McRobbie D, Ristic M. Detection of maturity and ligament injury using magic angle directional imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep;82(3):1041-1054. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27794. Epub 2019 May 12.

    PMID: 31081201BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Knee InjuriesLeg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TomographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Chinmay Gupte, PhD

    Imperial College NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Posted

January 26, 2026

Study Start

January 29, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data will be fully anonymised for any publication

Locations