NCT07364188

Brief Summary

A bronchodilator reversibility test is widely used in the diagnosis and management of obstructive lung diseases. Bronchodilators relieve symptoms in asthma and COPD. Traditionally, their effectiveness has been assessed using spirometric indices, particularly FEV₁. However, changes in FEV₁ often do not correlate well with patients' subjective experience of dyspnoea relief or with changes in small airway function. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) provides an effort-independent assessment of respiratory mechanics during tidal breathing and is more sensitive to small airway dysfunction than spirometry. Despite this, the clinical utility of IOS in routine COPD and asthma assessment remains underexplored, and its relationship to both spirometric response and symptom relief is not fully established, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for IOS parameters has not been firmly established. Determining the MCID is essential for interpreting individual patient responses in a clinically meaningful way and for guiding treatment decisions in both research and practice. Hypothesis \& Aims In patients with either asthma or COPD baseline values and bronchodilator responses are compared. More specifically, this study aims to:

  1. 1.assess baseline correlations: Evaluate the correlation between ΔX5-baseline (EFL expiratory flow limitation=small airway collapse during expiration), RV/TLC-baseline, X5-average at baseline, FEV1-baseline, VAS-dyspnea at baseline, and ACQ-6-baseline.
  2. 2.compare bronchodilator responses across methods: Examine the correlation between bronchodilator-induced changes in FEV₁ and IOS parameters (including both average and delta values) and explore their relationship with short-term changes in dyspnea.
  3. 3.establish clinical relevance: Determine the MCID for key IOS variables using both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches, anchored to perceived changes in lung symptoms.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
20mo left

Started Feb 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress14%
Feb 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

asthmaCOPDCorrelationBronchodilator responseMCID

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • FEV1

    Forced expiratory volumen in one second, L and % predicted

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • X5

    Reactance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • Dyspnoea

    Visual analog scale (0-100); 0 means no dyspnoea, and 100 means maximum dyspnoea

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • R5

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • R5-R20

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • Fres

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • AX

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • Delta-X5

    Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Asthma

FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \<0.7 at baseline (7) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26). Doctor diagnosed asthma Less than 10 packyears. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients aged less than 18 years old. * Not able to perform spirometry or impulse oscillometry. * Cognitive disorders and not able to answer Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), VAS dyspnea score, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (25-28). * Short-acting beta-agonists 6 h, long-acting beta-agonists 2 days, short-acting anti-muscarinic agent 12 h, Long-acting anti-muscarinic agents 2 days. * Comorbidities with significant influence on dyspnea eg. bronchiectasis, ILS, mb. Cordis, lung resection, anemia, and active malignant disease * BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

Diagnostic Test: Bronchodilator

COPD

FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \<0.7 at baseline (7) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26). Doctor diagnosed COPD Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears Exclusion Criteria: * Patients aged less than 18 years old. * Not able to perform spirometry or impulse oscillometry. * Cognitive disorders and not able to answer Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), VAS dyspnea score, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (25-28). * Short-acting beta-agonists 6 h, long-acting beta-agonists 2 days, short-acting anti-muscarinic agent 12 h, Long-acting anti-muscarinic agents 2 days. * Comorbidities with significant influence on dyspnea eg. bronchiectasis, ILS, mb. Cordis, lung resection, anemia, and active malignant disease * BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

Diagnostic Test: Bronchodilator

Interventions

BronchodilatorDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Classic beta-2-reversibility test

AsthmaCOPD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

referred to Allergy and Lung Clinic Elsinore, Denmark for evaluation of Asthma and COPD (obstructive lung disease)

You may qualify if:

  • Both asthma and COPD patients:
  • Written informed consent.
  • FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \<0.7 at baseline (7)
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26).
  • Asthma: Doctor diagnosed asthma
  • \. less than 10 packyears.
  • COPD: Doctor diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC \<0.7 post-bronchodilation 1. Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients aged less than 18 years old.
  • Not able to perform spirometry or impulse oscillometry.
  • Cognitive disorders and not able to answer Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), VAS dyspnea score, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (25-28).
  • Short-acting beta-agonists 6 h, long-acting beta-agonists 2 days, short-acting anti-muscarinic agent 12 h, Long-acting anti-muscarinic agents 2 days.
  • Comorbidities with significant influence on dyspnea eg. bronchiectasis, ILS, mb. Cordis, lung resection, anemia, and active malignant disease
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (15)

  • Halpin DMG. Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Time to Stop Chasing Shadows. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):349-351. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2248ED. No abstract available.

    PMID: 38190497BACKGROUND
  • Sim YS, Lee JH, Lee WY, Suh DI, Oh YM, Yoon JS, Lee JH, Cho JH, Kwon CS, Chang JH. Spirometry and Bronchodilator Test. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2017 Apr;80(2):105-112. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.80.2.105. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

    PMID: 28416951BACKGROUND
  • Dean J, Kolsum U, Hitchen P, Gupta V, Singh D. Clinical characteristics of COPD patients with tidal expiratory flow limitation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 May 22;12:1503-1506. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S137865. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28579768BACKGROUND
  • Paredi P, Goldman M, Alamen A, Ausin P, Usmani OS, Pride NB, Barnes PJ. Comparison of inspiratory and expiratory resistance and reactance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2010 Mar;65(3):263-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.120790.

    PMID: 20335298BACKGROUND
  • Bloom DA, Kaplan DJ, Mojica E, Strauss EJ, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA, Alaia MJ, Jazrawi LM. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):520-524. doi: 10.1177/03635465211053869. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

    PMID: 34854345BACKGROUND
  • Saadeh C, Saadeh C, Cross B, Gaylor M, Griffith M. Advantage of impulse oscillometry over spirometry to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and monitor pulmonary responses to bronchodilators: An observational study. SAGE Open Med. 2015 Apr 6;3:2050312115578957. doi: 10.1177/2050312115578957. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26770777BACKGROUND
  • Cottee AM, Seccombe LM, Thamrin C, King GG, Peters MJ, Farah CS. Bronchodilator Response Assessed by the Forced Oscillation Technique Identifies Poor Asthma Control With Greater Sensitivity Than Spirometry. Chest. 2020 Jun;157(6):1435-1441. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.035. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

    PMID: 31982392BACKGROUND
  • Greig R, Stewart K, Chan R, Lipworth B. Assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness using low-frequency impedance in type 2-high uncontrolled severe asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2025 Feb;134(2):231-232. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Oct 9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 39383941BACKGROUND
  • Kaminsky DA, Simpson SJ, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dandurand R, Dellaca RL, Farah CS, Farre R, Hall GL, Ioan I, Irvin CG, Kaczka DW, King GG, Kurosawa H, Lombardi E, Maksym GN, Marchal F, Oostveen E, Oppenheimer BW, Robinson PD, van den Berge M, Thamrin C. Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry. Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Feb 9;31(163):210208. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0208-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.

    PMID: 35140105BACKGROUND
  • King GG, Bates J, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dellaca RL, Farre R, Hall GL, Ioan I, Irvin CG, Kaczka DW, Kaminsky DA, Kurosawa H, Lombardi E, Maksym GN, Marchal F, Oppenheimer BW, Simpson SJ, Thamrin C, van den Berge M, Oostveen E. Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J. 2020 Feb 27;55(2):1900753. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00753-2019. Print 2020 Feb.

    PMID: 31772002BACKGROUND
  • Tashkin DP, Celli B, Senn S, Burkhart D, Kesten S, Menjoge S, Decramer M; UPLIFT Study Investigators. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1543-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800. Epub 2008 Oct 5.

    PMID: 18836213BACKGROUND
  • Janson C, Malinovschi A, Amaral AFS, Accordini S, Bousquet J, Buist AS, Canonica GW, Dahlen B, Garcia-Aymerich J, Gnatiuc L, Kowalski ML, Patel J, Tan W, Toren K, Zuberbier T, Burney P, Jarvis D. Bronchodilator reversibility in asthma and COPD: findings from three large population studies. Eur Respir J. 2019 Sep 5;54(3):1900561. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00561-2019. Print 2019 Sep.

    PMID: 31221806BACKGROUND
  • Kaminsky DA. What Is a Significant Bronchodilator Response? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Dec;16(12):1495-1497. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201908-604ED. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31774318BACKGROUND
  • Beasley R, Hughes R, Agusti A, Calverley P, Chipps B, Del Olmo R, Papi A, Price D, Reddel H, Mullerova H, Rapsomaniki E. Prevalence, Diagnostic Utility and Associated Characteristics of Bronchodilator Responsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):390-401. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1436OC.

    PMID: 38029294BACKGROUND
  • Chan R, Lipworth BJ. Oscillometry bronchodilator response in adult moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma patients: A prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Sep;52(9):1118-1120. doi: 10.1111/cea.14185. Epub 2022 Jun 22. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35707948BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAsthma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBronchial DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Thomas J Ringbæk, MSci

    Allergi og Lungeklinikken Helsingør

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Thomas J Ringbæk, MSci

CONTACT

Lars Frølund, MSci

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2026

First Posted

January 23, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

I have not applied for permission to share data with others.