ISOVUE Comparative Trial
ISOVUE
ISOVUE Contrast for Intraoperative Assessment of Discectomy Quality in TLIF: A Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to investigate a novel technique for intraoperative quantitative and qualitative feedback during discectomy and endplate preparation in TLIF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2026
CompletedJanuary 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
4.2 years
January 7, 2026
January 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Anteroposterior Plane Clearance
Disc space clearance in the anteroposterior (AP) plane at the index level measured on oblique radiographs.
Immediately after Discectomy
Mediolateral Plane Clearance
Disc space clearance in the mediolateral (ML) plane as measured by oblique radiographs.
Immediately after Discectomy/Excision Intraoperatively
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale survey assessing leg pain and back pain
First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Lumbar Lordosis
Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively
Pelvic Incidence
Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively
Disc Height
Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively
Oswestry Disability Index
First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)
Short Form Survey
First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Observation
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn the Observation group, after initial discectomy and endplate preparation, ISOVUE-300M contrast was administered into the disc space and orthogonal anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. The case then proceeded with graft and cage insertion without additional disc excision or endplate work.
Feedback
EXPERIMENTALIn the Feedback group, the surgeon was permitted to utilize the ISOVUE imaging as a feedback mechanism to then re-prepare the disc space prior to final graft/cage insertion. An additional dose of ISOVUE-300M was administered into the disc space with repeat radiographs obtained prior to grafting/cage insertion to demonstrate the effect of the second pass of disc and cartilage removal.
Interventions
In the Observation group, after initial discectomy and endplate preparation,ISOVUE-300M contrast was administered into the disc space and orthogonal anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. The case then proceeded with graft and cage insertion without additional disc excision or endplate work.
In the Feedback group, the surgeon was permitted to utilize the ISOVUE imaging as a feedback mechanism to then re-prepare the disc space prior to final graft/cage insertion. An additional dose of ISOVUE-300M was administered into the disc space with repeat radiographs obtained prior to grafting/cage insertion to demonstrate the effect of the second pass of disc and cartilage removal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing open circumferential transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or midline cortical TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis
You may not qualify if:
- All not in the group above
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Related Publications (4)
de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28647584BACKGROUNDLan T, Hu SY, Zhang YT, Zheng YC, Zhang R, Shen Z, Yang XJ. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 29367001BACKGROUNDKatuch V, Grega R, Knorovsky K, Banoci J, Katuchova J, Sasala M, Ivankova H, Kapralova P. Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(9):653-656. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_105.
PMID: 34463112BACKGROUNDReitman CA, Anderson DG, Fischgrund J. Surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: open versus minimally invasive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3082-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3171-8. Epub 2013 Jul 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 23873608BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2026
First Posted
January 23, 2026
Study Start
April 11, 2019
Primary Completion
June 19, 2023
Study Completion
June 19, 2023
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators will consider sharing if contacted with reasonable requests.