NCT07363759

Brief Summary

This study aimed to investigate a novel technique for intraoperative quantitative and qualitative feedback during discectomy and endplate preparation in TLIF.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 11, 2019

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 19, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 19, 2023

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2026

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

isovueiodinated contrast

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Anteroposterior Plane Clearance

    Disc space clearance in the anteroposterior (AP) plane at the index level measured on oblique radiographs.

    Immediately after Discectomy

  • Mediolateral Plane Clearance

    Disc space clearance in the mediolateral (ML) plane as measured by oblique radiographs.

    Immediately after Discectomy/Excision Intraoperatively

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Visual Analog Scale survey assessing leg pain and back pain

    First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Lumbar Lordosis

    Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively

  • Pelvic Incidence

    Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively

  • Disc Height

    Immediately after Discectomy Intraoperatively

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)

  • Short Form Survey

    First Postoperative Clinic Appointment (within first 6 weeks)

Study Arms (2)

Observation

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

In the Observation group, after initial discectomy and endplate preparation, ISOVUE-300M contrast was administered into the disc space and orthogonal anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. The case then proceeded with graft and cage insertion without additional disc excision or endplate work.

Procedure: ISOVUE 300 Observation

Feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

In the Feedback group, the surgeon was permitted to utilize the ISOVUE imaging as a feedback mechanism to then re-prepare the disc space prior to final graft/cage insertion. An additional dose of ISOVUE-300M was administered into the disc space with repeat radiographs obtained prior to grafting/cage insertion to demonstrate the effect of the second pass of disc and cartilage removal.

Procedure: ISOVUE 300 Feedback

Interventions

In the Observation group, after initial discectomy and endplate preparation,ISOVUE-300M contrast was administered into the disc space and orthogonal anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. The case then proceeded with graft and cage insertion without additional disc excision or endplate work.

Observation

In the Feedback group, the surgeon was permitted to utilize the ISOVUE imaging as a feedback mechanism to then re-prepare the disc space prior to final graft/cage insertion. An additional dose of ISOVUE-300M was administered into the disc space with repeat radiographs obtained prior to grafting/cage insertion to demonstrate the effect of the second pass of disc and cartilage removal.

Feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing open circumferential transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or midline cortical TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis

You may not qualify if:

  • All not in the group above

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

    PMID: 28647584BACKGROUND
  • Lan T, Hu SY, Zhang YT, Zheng YC, Zhang R, Shen Z, Yang XJ. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

    PMID: 29367001BACKGROUND
  • Katuch V, Grega R, Knorovsky K, Banoci J, Katuchova J, Sasala M, Ivankova H, Kapralova P. Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(9):653-656. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_105.

    PMID: 34463112BACKGROUND
  • Reitman CA, Anderson DG, Fischgrund J. Surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: open versus minimally invasive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3082-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3171-8. Epub 2013 Jul 20. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23873608BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomized into either a control (Observation) or investigational (Feedback) group. In the observation group, after initial discectomy, ISOVUE M300 contrast was administered into the disc space via angiocatheter to assess the extent of discectomy by obtaining orthogonal radiographs of the contrast-enhanced space. Then, the contrast agent was extracted via suction and the disc space was irrigated with saline. The case then proceeded with graft/cage insertion without additional excision. In the feedback group, prior to graft/cage insertion, the surgeon used the contrast feedback to enhance the preparation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Posted

January 23, 2026

Study Start

April 11, 2019

Primary Completion

June 19, 2023

Study Completion

June 19, 2023

Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigators will consider sharing if contacted with reasonable requests.

Locations