NCT07358741

Brief Summary

this study aims to compare the effectiveness of a one-day versus two-day ALS recertification course in terms of knowledge retention, practical skills performance, participant satisfaction, and confidence.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress42%
Dec 2025Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 9, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 12, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

StandardrecertificationALSERCknowledge retention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • overall effectiveness between the two-day stanrdand one-day ALS recertification

    • Baseline knowledge score

    24hours precourse

  • Practical skill effectiveness

    • Standardized team-leader assessment station at the end of each course. Scoring: 0 = Not performed/incorrect, 1 = Partially/performed with prompting, 2 = Performed correctly and independently.

    48 and 24 hours from standard amd recertification course respectively

  • Knowledge retention assessment

    post-course MCQ to evaluate decay; similar to pre-course MCQ

    3 months post course

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Participant satisfaction e

    48hours and 24 from standard and recertification course respectively

Study Arms (2)

standard ALS course

Two day course

Recertification Course

one day course

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

demographic data will be collected, including participants' age, sex, specialty, prior ALS course completion, participation in resuscitation teams, last CPR performance, and total online learning hours (minimum 16 hours for the standard ALS course and 8 hours for the recertification course).

You may qualify if:

  • Adult healthcare professionals (≥18 years) requiring ALS recertification, including doctors, nurses, and paramedics, who can attend the assigned course and follow-up assessments.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded if they cannot attend the assigned course or decline consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Egyptian resuscitation council

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Eman Ibrahim El-Desoki Mahmoud, MD, intensive care medicine

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
90 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor-intensive care medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2025

First Posted

January 22, 2026

Study Start

December 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The individual participant data (IPD) generated in this study will not be made publicly available in order to protect participant confidentiality and comply with ethical regulations.

Locations