Clinical Outcomes and Satisfaction of Stainless Steel vs Bioflx Crowns in Primary Molars
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Parent and Child Satisfaction Between Stainless Steel Crowns and Prefabricated Hybrid (Bioflx) Crowns in Primary Molars
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Bioflx crown (a tooth-colored material) is as effective as the standard stainless steel crown for treating severely decayed baby back teeth in children aged 4 to 10 years old. The study also aims to evaluate parent and child satisfaction with these restorative options. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Is the Bioflx crown as effective as the stainless steel crown in terms of durability, staying in place, and protecting the tooth from new decay?
- 2.Does the Bioflx crown maintain better gum health and cause less wear on the opposing teeth compared to the stainless steel crown?
- 3.Receive one Bioflx crown and one stainless steel crown on similar teeth on opposite sides of the mouth.
- 4.Visit the clinic for two separate appointments, spaced 1 to 2 weeks apart, to have the crowns placed.
- 5.Return for checkups at 3 months and 6 months so researchers can examine the health of the teeth and gums.
- 6.Answer questions about how happy they are with the appearance and feel of the crowns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2027
January 22, 2026
January 1, 2026
11 months
January 17, 2026
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
- Clincal outcomes: crown stability; bite discomfort; fit and color changes at the crown edge; crown shape; crown retention; crown wear; wear of the opposing tooth or crown - Oral hygiene and gum health around the crowns
* Each clinical parameter was assessed using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. * Outcomes were rated on a three-level scale (Alpha, Bravo, Charlie), where Alpha indicates an ideal condition, Bravo an acceptable condition with minor defects, and Charlie an unacceptable condition requiring repair or replacement. For analysis, Alpha and Bravo scores were considered acceptable, while Charlie scores were considered failures. * Secondary caries were assessed using periapical radiographs, while all other clinical parameters were assessed by dental explorer and documented using photographs (Canon 6D camera). * This outcome evaluates how clean the teeth are and how healthy the gums are around crowned teeth. Plaque and gum condition were evaluated using standard dental indices (Plaque Index and Gingival Index). Dentists exam by using a periodontal probe at six points around the crowns, and the scores were combined to provide an overall result.
- Crown stability, bite discomfort, fit and color at the crown margin, and crown shape were checked after crown placement, at 3 months, and at 6 months follow-up visits. Others were checked at 3, 6 months, except secondary caries was checked at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
parent and child satisfaction
From immediately after crowns placement through the 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits.
Study Arms (2)
Stainless steel crown
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive a prefabricated stainless steel crown placed on a primary molar according to standard pediatric dental procedures. The crown is selected, adapted, and cemented following conventional clinical protocols and serves as the standard treatment comparator in this study.
Bioflx crown
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a prefabricated Bioflx crown placed on a primary molar using manufacturer-recommended techniques. The crown is selected and cemented following standardized clinical procedures and is evaluated as the experimental intervention for clinical performance and patient-related outcomes.
Interventions
Bioflx crowns are prefabricated tooth-colored polymer crowns designed to improve esthetics compared with conventional stainless steel crowns
Stainless steel crowns are prefabricated metal crowns that have been widely and long used in pediatric dentistry to restore primary molars with extensive caries or following pulp therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with at least two carious primary molars located on both the right and left sides of the dental arch and indicated for crown placement
- Children and their parents have ability to communicate in Vietnamese
- Primary molars indicated for full-coverage crown restoration, including teeth with:
- Multi-surface caries
- Extensive caries or enamel-dentin defects
- Interproximal caries
- High risk of failure with other restorative materials
- Teeth following pulpotomy or pulpectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Uncooperative children
- Presence of psychiatric or neurological disorders affecting communication ability
- Malocclusion (crossbite or scissors bite)
- Having abnormal parafunctional habits
- Teeth with root resorption exceeding one half of the root length
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- PHAM LE ANH THYlead
Study Sites (2)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Related Publications (5)
Tin BT, Phuong NTM, Anh NTH, Bau TH, Dong TT, Ngoc VTN. Short-Term Clinical Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns for Primary Molar Restoration in Children Aged 4-8 Years in Vietnam: A Pilot Observational Study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2026 Jan;36(1):187-194. doi: 10.1111/ipd.70039. Epub 2025 Oct 22.
PMID: 41126408BACKGROUNDMathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1418-1423. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PMID: 32509626BACKGROUNDLopez-Cazaux S, Aiem E, Velly AM, Muller-Bolla M. Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Aug 24;20(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3559-1.
PMID: 31445509BACKGROUNDPozos-Guillen A, Chavarria-Bolanos D, Garrocho-Rangel A. Split-mouth design in Paediatric Dentistry clinical trials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Mar;18(1):61-65. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.13.
PMID: 28494606BACKGROUNDPatil AS, Jain M, Choubey S, Patil M, Chunawala Y. Comparative evaluation of clinical success of Stainless Steel and Bioflx crowns in primary molar - A 12 month split mouth prospective randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):37-45. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_484_23. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
PMID: 38616425BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Huong Thi Nguyen Nguyen, PhD
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dentist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2026
First Posted
January 22, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01