Comparing Stainless Steel Crowns with Prefabricated Resin Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth
A 36-Month Prospective Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial Comparing Stainless Steel Crowns with Prefabricated Resin Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main reason for this research study is to learn more about a new flexible white dental crown (BioFLX) by comparing it to an existing flexible metal crown (Stainless Steel Crown). It is of interest to see if this new white crown is clinically equivalent to the existing silver crown that is mainly used in pediatric dentistry. A potential participant for this study would have cavities that require a crown, a type of filling that covers the entire tooth, and recommended dental work be done under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2025
CompletedDecember 10, 2024
May 1, 2024
12 months
November 27, 2024
December 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The United States Public Health Service Restorative criteria
Study criteria being selected would be: Gingival Health, Plaque retention, Occlusal wear, and crown retention as defined by the following Alpha, Bravo, Charlie. Gingival Health according to the Modified Gingival Index (MGI): Alpha (A) normal gingiva Bravo (B) mild inflammation: Charlie (C) moderate inflammation Plaque Retention according to the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI -S): Alpha (A) 0, 1 Bravo (B)2 Charlie (C) 3 Occlusal Wear: Alpha (A) occlusal surface intact Bravo (B) wear of occlusal surface without tooth surface exposure Charlie (C) wear of occlusal surface with tooth surface exposure. Crown retention: Alpha (A) Intact crown Bravo (B) partial loss of crown material Charlie (C) Crown lost
36 months
Study Arms (2)
SSC
OTHERExperimental: 3M Stainless Steel Crowns. In this split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to receive SSC in the left or right side of the mouth.
BioFLX Crown
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: BioFLX Crowns. In this split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to receive BioFLX crowns on the side opposite of the 3M Stainless Steel Crowns.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CCHMC pediatric dental patients between the ages of 2 years to 5 years and 11 months, at the time of recruitment, who present to any CCHMC dental clinic location and then are found to need full mouth dental rehabilitation.
- Patients who speak the most common languages at CCHMC will be able to be recruited for the study.
- o English, Spanish, Arabic, Uzbek, Nepali, Chinese Mandarin, Russian, French.
- These patients must qualify for treatment at the CCHMC dental in-office general anesthesia (IOGA) area or the Procedure Center (PC). IOGA and the PC will be selected as a venue of treatment to control behavioral factors. This is not specific to the study and would occur due to their treatment needs.
- Participants will have at least one pair of contralateral primary molars with the need for a full coverage restoration in the same arch.
- For example, tooth A \& J, B \& I, S \& L, or T \& K
- For each participant, a minimum of one SSC or one PRC will be randomly assigned via a split mouth design to be placed as part of the study.
- Need for Full coverage and high caries risk will be defined by AAPD Best Practice Guidelines 2,16
- o Teeth With
- Extensive caries
- Cervical decalcification
- Developmental defects (e.g., hypoplasia, hypocalcification)
- When failure of other available restorative materials is likely (e.g., interproximal caries extending beyond line angles, patients with bruxism)
- Following pulpotomy or pulpectomy
- For definitive restorative treatment for high caries-risk children as defined by the AAPD
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who do not wish to participate in the study.
- Patients who do not wish to or cannot reliably return for follow-up visits.
- Red dye allergy as patient will not be able to be plaque disclosed during follow-up visits.
- Participants who do not speak English, Spanish, Arabic, Uzbek, Nepali, Chinese Mandarin, Russian, French.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2024
First Posted
December 3, 2024
Study Start
May 17, 2024
Primary Completion
May 15, 2025
Study Completion
May 15, 2025
Last Updated
December 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It can be if needed