Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
Evaluation Of Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns versus zirconia crowns on primary molars through a randomized clinical trial.
- Primary Objective: To compare the preparation time required for Bioflex crowns and zirconia crowns on primary molars in pediatric patients.
- Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance of Bioflex crowns compared to zirconia crowns, including: Retention, Patient Satisfaction, Parental Satisfaction, Occlusal Wear and Gingival Health. the main question it aim to answer: Is there a significant difference in the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the primary molars of pediatric patients?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2026
ExpectedMay 13, 2025
May 1, 2025
Same day
May 5, 2025
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
prepration time
measured by stop watch per minutes
time frame: T0: 0 basline, follow up 12 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Occlusal wear of crown
T (Time): 12 months Intervals: T0: 0, T1: 3 months, T2: 6 months, T3: 12 months
retention
Follow-up: 12 months Intervals: T0: 0, T1: 3 months, T2: 6 months, T3: 12 months
Gingival Health
12 months Intervals: T0: 0, T1: 3 months, T2: 6 months, T3: 12 months
Child and parental satisfaction
T (Time): 12 months Intervals: T0: 0, T1: 3 months, T2: 6 months, T3: 12 months
Study Arms (2)
group A performed bioflx crown
EXPERIMENTAL(Nu smile, united state) introduced Biofix Crowns and claimed as the first flexible, durable, and esthetic preformed crown for primary molars. Biofix Crowns are monochromatic, metal-free, tooth-colored crowns made up of high-strength resin polymer used in the medical device industry having high strength, flexibility, and durability. These crowns are autoclavable and are like SSC in tooth preparation as claimed by the manufacturer. Their flexibility and snap-fit technology aim to improve retention while minimizing trauma during placement.
group B performed zirconia crown
EXPERIMENTALNuSmile Zirconia Crowns are prefabricated, esthetic full-coverage restorations designed for primary teeth. Known for their superior strength, durability, and natural tooth-like appearance, these crowns provide an excellent alternative to traditional stainless steel crowns. Made from high-quality medical-grade zirconia, they are biocompatible, resistant to chipping, and highly polished to minimize plaque accumulation and gingival irritation. NuSmile Zirconia Crowns require significant tooth preparation for proper fit and retention. They are available in various sizes to accommodate different primary molars and anterior teeth. Their lifelike translucency and color-matching capabilities make them a preferred choice for parents and clinicians.
Interventions
(Group A: Preformed Biofix Crown - Assigned Intervention) Crown Selection \& Tooth Preparation: Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select an appropriately sized crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the crown that closely matches the measured mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts using a trial-and-error approach. If crimping is necessary, use Howe's pliers. Perform 1-1.5 mm occlusal reduction using a tapered diamond bur. Reduce proximal areas by approximately 0.5 mm to clear the contact area. Crown Placement \& Cementation: Ensure a snug fit of the selected crown. Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown firmly using finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure proper seating. Final Adjustments \& Cleanup: Remove excess cement with floss or an explorer. Verify the crown's fit, occlusion, and stability.
Group B: Preformed Zirconia Crown - Assigned Intervention) Crown Selection: Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select the appropriate crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the one that closely matches the mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts. Tooth Preparation: Reduce the occlusal surface by 1.5-2 mm using a tapered diamond bur. Reduce interproximal areas by 1-1.5 mm, ensuring a feather-edge finish. Perform a 1-2 mm subgingival preparation in passively placed fissure bur. Crown Placement \& Passive Fit Check: Place the selected crown on the prepared tooth. Cementation of the Crown: Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown with passive finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure seating.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged between 4 and 8 years with a primary molar that needs to be covered by a crown.
- Medically healthy children (ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification).
- Children whose parent or guardian is willing to sign an informed consent.
- Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits.
- Frankl's positive and definitely positive patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.
- Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.
- Children with a history of allergies; known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Biofix crowns.
- Children with any systemic conditions or disabilities that may affect their ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt, 12613, Egypt
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hala m Alshaeri, Bachelor of Dental surgery
Cairo university faculty of dentistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2025
First Posted
May 13, 2025
Study Start
June 15, 2025
Primary Completion
June 15, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 16, 2026
Last Updated
May 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share