NCT07350252

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical randomized trial is to compare local infiltration analgesia (LIA) alone versus the combination of LIA with saphenous nerve (SN) block, block of the nerve to vastus medialis (NVM), and anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN) block in participants undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary outcome is pain intensity, measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at multiple time points after surgery. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, time to mobilization, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, neurological complications and differences in opioid consumption and NRS pain scores between general and spinal anesthesia.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
16mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Mar 2026Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 20, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

January 20, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity: Measured using the NRS scale 0-10 at multiple predefined time points postoperatively (1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours)

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) upon arrival at the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-PACU admission, as well as at ward admission, on the evening of the surgery day, the morning of Postoperative Day 1 (POD1), and at discharge. At the post-surgery visit at 14 days NRS was also assessed.

    The day of surgery, postop day 1 and 14 days post-surgery

  • Difference in analgesia consumption

    Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption: Cumulative morphine equivalents (mg) recorded during hospitalization (intraoperative and postoperative period).

    The day of surgery, postop day 1 and 14 days post-surgery

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to mobilization

    The day of surgery, postop day 1

  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    The day of surgery, postop day 1

  • Neurological complications

    The day of surgery, postop day 1 and at day 14 post-surgery. Patients that report or shows neurological complications at the post surgery visit day 14 will be followed up once more, 6 month after surgery.

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    1-5 days post-surgery

  • Difference in postoperative pain depending on method of anesthesia

    The day of surgery, postop day 1 and 14 days post-surgery

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Arm-Nerve blocks in addition to Local Infiltration Analgesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ultrasound guided nerve blocks are administered preoperatively in addition to the Local Infiltration Analgesia administered during surgery. Nerve blocks used: 1. Nerve to Vastus Medialis (NVM) block: Injection: 5 ml ropivacaine 5% with clonidine 1.875 micrograms per ml 2. Saphenous Nerve (SN) block: Injection: 10 ml ropivacaine 0.5% with clonidine 1.875 micrograms per ml 3. Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (AFCN) Block: AFCN divides into multiple branches at the level of the femoral triangle Injection: 1 ml ropivacaine 5% with clonidine 1.875 micrograms per ml per branch Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA): 150 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml with 0.5 mg adrenaline is infiltrated periarticular around the knee capsule, collateral ligaments, under the patella, and subcutaneously

Drug: Ropivacain 5 mg/ml + Clonidine

Control arm - Local Infiltration Analgesia only

NO INTERVENTION

No ultrasound guided nerve blocks are administered. Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) is the same as in the- intervention arm: 150 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml with 0.5 mg adrenaline is infiltrated periarticular around the knee capsule, collateral ligaments, under the patella, and subcutaneously

Interventions

Drug used in the block

Intervention Arm-Nerve blocks in addition to Local Infiltration Analgesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy or other bleeding disorder that precludes regional anesthesia
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Inability to understand spoken and written Swedish
  • Unwillingness to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Trelleborg Hospital

Trelleborg, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Bjorn S, Nielsen TD, Jensen AE, Jessen C, Kolsen-Petersen JA, Moriggl B, Hoermann R, Nyengaard JR, Bendtsen TF. The anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve innervates the anterior knee: a randomized volunteer trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jul-Aug;89(7-8):643-652. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16910-5. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

    PMID: 36852567BACKGROUND
  • Riegler G, Pivec C, Jengojan S, Mayer JA, Schellen C, Trattnig S, Bodner G. Cutaneous nerve fields of the anteromedial lower limb-Determination with selective ultrasound-guided nerve blockade. Clin Anat. 2021 Jan;34(1):11-18. doi: 10.1002/ca.23582. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

    PMID: 32065687BACKGROUND
  • Luo ZY, Yu QP, Zeng WN, Xiao Q, Chen X, Wang HY, Zhou Z. Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05388-5.

    PMID: 35590308BACKGROUND
  • Mingdeng X, Yuzhang A, Xiaoxiao X, Yucheng A, Xin W, Dianming J. Combined application of adductor canal block and local infiltration anesthesia in primary total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):913-926. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03706-x. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

    PMID: 33417022BACKGROUND
  • Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Weibel S, Zahn PK, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Meyer-Friessem CH. Adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain treatment in adults undergoing knee surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 26;2019(10):CD012262. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012262.pub2.

    PMID: 31684698BACKGROUND
  • Berikashvili LB, Yadgarov MY, Kuzovlev AN, Smirnova AV, Kadantseva KK, Kuznetsov IV, Polyakov PA, Likhvantsev VV. Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Network Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2024 Jul 1;40(7):447-457. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001214.

    PMID: 38561898BACKGROUND
  • Hasabo EA, Assar A, Mahmoud MM, Abdalrahman HA, Ibrahim EA, Hasanin MA, Emam AK, AbdelQadir YH, AbdelAzim AA, Ali AS. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 26;101(34):e30110. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030110.

    PMID: 36042669BACKGROUND
  • Wang D, Yang Y, Li Q, Tang SL, Zeng WN, Xu J, Xie TH, Pei FX, Yang L, Li LL, Zhou ZK. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40721. doi: 10.1038/srep40721.

    PMID: 28079176BACKGROUND
  • Peng XQ, Fei ZG, Sun CG, Zhou QJ. Efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia for pain management in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20640. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020640.

    PMID: 32481477BACKGROUND
  • Marques EM, Jones HE, Elvers KT, Pyke M, Blom AW, Beswick AD. Local anaesthetic infiltration for peri-operative pain control in total hip and knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analyses of short- and long-term effectiveness. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 5;15:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-220.

    PMID: 24996539BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Clonidine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolinesImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Andreas Ekman, MD, PhD

    VO Planned Operations, Trelleborg Hospital, and Lund University, Sweden

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Fredrik Fellert, MD

CONTACT

Andreas Ekman, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessor blinded; staff registering NRS pain scores and opioid consumption are blinded to group allocation. No sham block is used in the control group
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Controlled Trial Number of Arms: 2 parallel arms Allocation Ratio: 1:1 randomization using computer-generated sequence Blinding: Outcome assessor blinded; staff registering NRS pain scores and opioid consumption are blinded to group allocation. No sham block is used in the control group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2025

First Posted

January 20, 2026

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

January 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will be de-identified; each patient receives a unique enrollment number. De-identified study data will be stored in an Excel spreadsheet secured behind Lund University's institutional firewall. Data will not be shared publicly. Access to anonymized datasets may be considered upon reasonable request to the principal investigators, subject to GDPR compliance and institutional review approval. Data Availability: Results and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and may be presented at scientific conferences. Individual patient data will remain confidential and protected in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.

Locations