NCT07339618

Brief Summary

This study intends to employ verbal stimulation, tactile stimulation, and kinetic stimulation as interventions during the emergence phase from general anesthesia to facilitate recovery.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
205

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
14mo left

Started Oct 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress33%
Oct 2025Jun 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 11, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 14, 2026

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

January 14, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

General anesthesiaEmergenceVerbal stimulationSomatosensory stimulationEEGRecovery of consciousness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to first eye opening

    defined as the interval from discontinuation of anesthetic agents to the moment the patient opens both eyes in response to a verbal command and is able to keep them open for at least 5 seconds.

    Perioperative

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Changes in EEG power

    Perioperative

  • Time to target BIS values

    Perioperative

  • Extubation time

    Perioperative

  • Emergence agitation

    Perioperative

  • Sedation depth after extubation

    Perioperative

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (5)

Verbal Stimulation Group:

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Verbal Stimulation

Shoulder Tapping Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Shoulder Tapping

Shoulder Shaking Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Shoulder Shaking

Combined Verbal + Shoulder Tapping Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Verbal StimulationBehavioral: Shoulder Tapping

Combined Verbal + Shoulder Shaking Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Verbal StimulationBehavioral: Shoulder Shaking

Interventions

Patients will wear headphones connected to a voice playback device that delivers pre-recorded verbal stimuli. Each voice message will last approximately 3 seconds, with a speech rate of 200-300 ms per character, and the volume will be set at a normal speaking level (60 dB). After each playback, there will be a 10-second interval before the next repetition, and the verbal stimulus will be played three times per intervention cycle.If the patient shows no eye opening or clear response, the standard verbal stimulation procedure will be repeated after a 3-minute interval, until a response is observed.

Combined Verbal + Shoulder Shaking GroupCombined Verbal + Shoulder Tapping GroupVerbal Stimulation Group:

No audio will be played through the patient's headphones. Upon discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the investigator will begin tapping the patient's left shoulder. All operators will receive standardized training to ensure procedural consistency. The tapping frequency will be 2 taps per second, i.e., six taps within 3 seconds, paced using a metronome to maintain rhythm uniformity. Each tapping event (six taps over 3 seconds) will last 3 seconds, followed by a 10-second interval before the next tapping event.

Combined Verbal + Shoulder Tapping GroupShoulder Tapping Group

No audio will be played through the patient's headphones. Upon discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the investigator will begin gently shaking the patient's left shoulder.All investigators will undergo standardized training to ensure consistency of operation. Each shaking event (three shakes within 3 seconds) will last 3 seconds, followed by a 10-second interval before the next shaking event. Each intervention cycle will include three shaking events.

Combined Verbal + Shoulder Shaking GroupShoulder Shaking Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III;
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic abdominal surgery, including gastric, colorectal, or biliary procedures;

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA physical status IV;
  • Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m²;
  • Presence of underlying neurological dysfunction, cognitive impairment, or auditory disorders;
  • Neurological, cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal dysfunction;
  • Current use of antipsychotic medications or a history of psychiatric illness;
  • History of alcohol abuse or substance dependence;
  • Exposure to general anesthesia or sedation within 1 month prior to surgery;
  • Presence of intracranial implants or a history of epilepsy;
  • Known allergy to any drugs used in this study;
  • Preoperative use of electronic hearing aids or implanted auditory devices;
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (27)

  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND
  • Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;27(7):1325-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00022.

    PMID: 10446827BACKGROUND
  • Rosow C, Manberg PJ. Bispectral index monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;19(4):947-66, xi. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(01)80018-3.

    PMID: 11778388BACKGROUND
  • Cooper RM, O'Sullivan E, Popat M, Behringer E, Hagberg CA. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2013 Feb;68(2):217. doi: 10.1111/anae.12139. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23298360BACKGROUND
  • Jee D, Park SY. Lidocaine sprayed down the endotracheal tube attenuates the airway-circulatory reflexes by local anesthesia during emergence and extubation. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jan;96(1):293-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200301000-00058.

    PMID: 12505969BACKGROUND
  • Lee S, Sohn JY, Hwang IE, Lee HJ, Yoon S, Bahk JH, Kim BR. Effect of a repeated verbal reminder of orientation on emergence agitation after general anaesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

    PMID: 36697272BACKGROUND
  • Hughes SW, Crunelli V. Thalamic mechanisms of EEG alpha rhythms and their pathological implications. Neuroscientist. 2005 Aug;11(4):357-72. doi: 10.1177/1073858405277450.

    PMID: 16061522BACKGROUND
  • Purdon PL, Pierce ET, Mukamel EA, Prerau MJ, Walsh JL, Wong KF, Salazar-Gomez AF, Harrell PG, Sampson AL, Cimenser A, Ching S, Kopell NJ, Tavares-Stoeckel C, Habeeb K, Merhar R, Brown EN. Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):E1142-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221180110. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

    PMID: 23487781BACKGROUND
  • Lipp M, Schneider G, Kreuzer M, Pilge S. Substance-dependent EEG during recovery from anesthesia and optimization of monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun;38(3):603-612. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01103-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

    PMID: 38108943BACKGROUND
  • Moody OA, Zhang ER, Vincent KF, Kato R, Melonakos ED, Nehs CJ, Solt K. The Neural Circuits Underlying General Anesthesia and Sleep. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1254-1264. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005361.

    PMID: 33857967BACKGROUND
  • Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical Electroencephalography for Anesthesiologists: Part I: Background and Basic Signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):937-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000841.

    PMID: 26275092BACKGROUND
  • Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R, Altmann S, Wilhelm W. Narcotrend monitoring allows faster emergence and a reduction of drug consumption in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00009.

    PMID: 12826839BACKGROUND
  • Song D, White PF. Remifentanil as an adjuvant during desflurane anesthesia facilitates early recovery after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1999 Aug;11(5):364-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00061-6.

    PMID: 10526805BACKGROUND
  • Wang TX, Xiong B, Xu W, Wei HH, Qu WM, Hong ZY, Huang ZL. Activation of Parabrachial Nucleus Glutamatergic Neurons Accelerates Reanimation from Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Mice. Anesthesiology. 2019 Jan;130(1):106-118. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002475.

    PMID: 30325744BACKGROUND
  • Muindi F, Kenny JD, Taylor NE, Solt K, Wilson MA, Brown EN, Van Dort CJ. Electrical stimulation of the parabrachial nucleus induces reanimation from isoflurane general anesthesia. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jun 1;306:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

    PMID: 26971629BACKGROUND
  • Gemma M, Nicelli E, Gioia L, Moizo E, Beretta L, Calvi MR. Acupuncture accelerates recovery after general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60159-5.

    PMID: 25797640BACKGROUND
  • Cao X, Wang B, Liu M, Li J. Effect of recorded mother's voice on emergence delirium in pediatric patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2024 May-Jun;100(3):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

    PMID: 37844877BACKGROUND
  • Jung YS, Paik H, Min SH, Choo H, Seo M, Bahk JH, Seo JH. Calling the patient's own name facilitates recovery from general anaesthesia: a randomised double-blind trial. Anaesthesia. 2017 Feb;72(2):197-203. doi: 10.1111/anae.13688. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

    PMID: 27786358BACKGROUND
  • Krom AJ, Marmelshtein A, Gelbard-Sagiv H, Tankus A, Hayat H, Hayat D, Matot I, Strauss I, Fahoum F, Soehle M, Bostrom J, Mormann F, Fried I, Nir Y. Anesthesia-induced loss of consciousness disrupts auditory responses beyond primary cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11770-11780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917251117. Epub 2020 May 12.

    PMID: 32398367BACKGROUND
  • Nourski KV, Banks MI, Steinschneider M, Rhone AE, Kawasaki H, Mueller RN, Todd MM, Howard MA 3rd. Electrocorticographic delineation of human auditory cortical fields based on effects of propofol anesthesia. Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:78-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.061. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

    PMID: 28254512BACKGROUND
  • Bonhomme V, Boveroux P, Brichant JF, Laureys S, Boly M. Neural correlates of consciousness during general anesthesia using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Arch Ital Biol. 2012 Jun-Sep;150(2-3):155-63. doi: 10.4449/aib.v150i2.1242.

    PMID: 23165875BACKGROUND
  • Zion-Golumbic E, Schroeder CE. Attention modulates 'speech-tracking' at a cocktail party. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;16(7):363-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 30.

    PMID: 22651956BACKGROUND
  • Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2638-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0808281. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21190458BACKGROUND
  • Mashour GA, Palanca BJ, Basner M, Li D, Wang W, Blain-Moraes S, Lin N, Maier K, Muench M, Tarnal V, Vanini G, Ochroch EA, Hogg R, Schwartz M, Maybrier H, Hardie R, Janke E, Golmirzaie G, Picton P, McKinstry-Wu AR, Avidan MS, Kelz MB. Recovery of consciousness and cognition after general anesthesia in humans. Elife. 2021 May 10;10:e59525. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59525.

    PMID: 33970101BACKGROUND
  • Song XJ, Hu JJ. Neurobiological basis of emergence from anesthesia. Trends Neurosci. 2024 May;47(5):355-366. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

    PMID: 38490858BACKGROUND
  • Patel SR, Ballesteros JJ, Ahmed OJ, Huang P, Briscoe J, Eskandar EN, Ishizawa Y. Dynamics of recovery from anaesthesia-induced unconsciousness across primate neocortex. Brain. 2020 Mar 1;143(3):833-843. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa017.

    PMID: 32049333BACKGROUND
  • Zhang D, Wei Y. Distinct Neural Mechanisms Between Anesthesia Induction and Emergence: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg. 2025 Jul 1;141(1):162-171. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007114. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

    PMID: 38861419BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2025

First Posted

January 14, 2026

Study Start

October 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

January 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual participant data will be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author after publication and ethical approval. Data will be shared via email request to the corresponding author within 6 months after publication.

Locations