NCT07321405

Brief Summary

The aim of this research is to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output and stroke volume in patients with septic shock, to evaluate the potential of EC as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
20mo left

Started Apr 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress6%
Apr 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2027

Last Updated

January 7, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.

    to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.

    2026-2028

  • cardiac output and stroke volume in septic shock patients

    comparison between accuracy and reliability in assessment of cardiac out put and stroke volume using echocardiogram vs electrical cardiometer

    baseline

  • to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.

    to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.

    2026-2028

Study Arms (1)

septic shock patients

echocardiography and electrical cardiometry will be applied to these patients

Device: echocardiogramDevice: Electrical cardiometry

Interventions

Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation.

septic shock patients

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors.

septic shock patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

patients were aged more than 18 years diagnosed with septic shock following the surviving sepsis campaign \-

You may not qualify if:

  • patients aged less than 18 years pregnant women cases suffering cardiac diseases (heart failure, arrhythmia, moderate, and severe valvular disease) patients with poor quality echocardiographic images and measurements

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, 71511, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Song W, Guo J, Cao D, Jiang J, Yang T, Ma X, Yuan H, Wu J, Guan X, Si X. Comparison of noninvasive electrical cardiometry and transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03005-1.

    PMID: 40082773BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock, Septic

Interventions

Echocardiography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisUltrasonographyHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular

Study Officials

  • ahmed obeid allah, professor

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • alaa abd elbadee, lecturer

    Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • mostafa hosney, lecturer

    Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Osman khalaf, bachelor

CONTACT

osman khalaf, resident

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
resident physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Posted

January 7, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2027

Last Updated

January 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations