STOP HCC-GAAD-APAC-Thailand
A Prospective, Interventional, Longitudinal APAC Study Evaluating Clinical Utility of GAAD Score for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-risk APAC Patient Population
1 other identifier
interventional
2,100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is frequently underutilized, and currently available biomarkers, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), demonstrate suboptimal diagnostic performance. This prospective study aims to evaluate a simplified multivariate index, the GAAD score-comprising gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II)-for its ability to improve the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. The study hypothesizes that incorporation of the GAAD score into standard HCC surveillance strategies will improve diagnostic performance compared with existing surveillance modalities alone and may provide evidence to support its inclusion in future clinical practice guidelines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
January 6, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.9 years
November 15, 2025
December 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Ultrasound, AFP, and GAAD Score as Standalone Surveillance Modalities
To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of Ultrasound, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and the GAAD score when used individually for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Sensitivity will be calculated for each modality separately by comparing surveillance results with the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
False Positive Rate of Ultrasound, AFP, and GAAD Score as Standalone Surveillance Modalities
To evaluate the false positive rate of Ultrasound, serum AFP, and the GAAD score when used individually for HCC surveillance. The false positive rate will be calculated for each modality separately based on surveillance results compared with the reference standard diagnosis. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Combined Ultrasound + GAAD Score for HCC Surveillance
To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of the combined Ultrasound and GAAD score strategy for HCC surveillance. A positive surveillance result will be defined according to the prespecified combination criteria (e.g., either test positive or both tests positive, as defined in the protocol). Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
False Positive Rate of Combined Ultrasound + GAAD Score for HCC Surveillance
To evaluate the false positive rate of the combined Ultrasound and GAAD score strategy for HCC surveillance, using the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Combined Ultrasound + AFP for HCC Surveillance
To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of the combined Ultrasound and serum AFP strategy for HCC surveillance, based on predefined combination criteria. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
False Positive Rate of Combined Ultrasound + AFP for HCC Surveillance
To evaluate the false positive rate of the combined Ultrasound and serum AFP strategy for HCC surveillance, compared with the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
Sensitivity and Specificity of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of Combined Ultrasound + AFP
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
Sensitivity and Specificity of Combined Ultrasound + AFP
Over 24 months of patient follow-up
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
GAAD Score
OTHERAll enrolled participants will undergo standard hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance consisting of blood sampling and abdominal ultrasound performed every 6 months for a total follow-up period of 24 months. Blood samples will be analyzed for serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) to calculate the GAAD score, a multivariable index incorporating gender, age, AFP, and PIVKA-II. A GAAD score ≥ 2.57 will trigger a recall procedure, defined as diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. This recall procedure is conducted in addition to standard surveillance recall criteria, which include detection of a suspicious hepatic lesion measuring ≥ 1 cm on ultrasound or elevated or rising serum AFP levels (≥ 20 ng/mL).
Interventions
All enrolled participants will undergo standard hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, consisting of blood sampling and abdominal ultrasound performed every 6 months for a total follow-up period of 24 months. Blood samples will be analyzed for serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) to calculate the GAAD score, a multivariable index incorporating gender, age, AFP, and PIVKA-II. A GAAD score of ≥ 2.57 will trigger a recall procedure, defined as further diagnostic evaluation using multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. This recall procedure is performed in addition to standard surveillance recall criteria, which include detection of a suspicious hepatic lesion measuring ≥ 1 cm on ultrasound or elevated or rising serum AFP levels (≥ 20 ng/mL).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with chronic liver disease who have an indication for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, including one or more of the following:
- Liver cirrhosis of any etiology (e.g., chronic hepatitis B virus \[HBV\], chronic hepatitis C virus \[HCV\], metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis \[MASH\], or alcohol-related liver disease \[ALD\])
- Non-cirrhotic chronic liver disease (e.g., HCV, MASH, or ALD) with evidence of stage F3 fibrosis
- Chronic HBV infection with a clinical diagnosis of non-cirrhotic liver disease
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of any active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer
- History of previously diagnosed malignancy, including prior hepatocellular carcinoma
- Life expectancy of less than 2 years
- Use of vitamin K antagonists within 1 week prior to enrollment
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m²
- Significant hepatic decompensation or Child-Pugh class C liver disease
- Unwillingness or inability to undergo computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent or to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Related Publications (5)
Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, Waljee AK, Singal AG. Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1706-1718.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
PMID: 29425931RESULTBest J, Bechmann LP, Sowa JP, Sydor S, Dechene A, Pflanz K, Bedreli S, Schotten C, Geier A, Berg T, Fischer J, Vogel A, Bantel H, Weinmann A, Schattenberg JM, Huber Y, Wege H, von Felden J, Schulze K, Bettinger D, Thimme R, Sinner F, Schutte K, Weiss KH, Toyoda H, Yasuda S, Kumada T, Berhane S, Wichert M, Heider D, Gerken G, Johnson P, Canbay A. GALAD Score Detects Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an International Cohort of Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):728-735.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
PMID: 31712073RESULTOmata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017 Jul;11(4):317-370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PMID: 28620797RESULTEuropean Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 29628281RESULTSingal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA, Jou JH, Kulik LM, Agopian VG, Marrero JA, Mendiratta-Lala M, Brown DB, Rilling WS, Goyal L, Wei AC, Taddei TH. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):1922-1965. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466. Epub 2023 May 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 37199193RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tawesak Tanwandee, MD
Siriraj Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tawesak Tanwandee, MD
Siriraj Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Tawesak Tanwandee, MD
Siriraj Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tawesak Tanwandee
Siriraj Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2025
First Posted
January 6, 2026
Study Start
February 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the policy of the institutes.