NCT07319299

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is frequently underutilized, and currently available biomarkers, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), demonstrate suboptimal diagnostic performance. This prospective study aims to evaluate a simplified multivariate index, the GAAD score-comprising gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II)-for its ability to improve the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. The study hypothesizes that incorporation of the GAAD score into standard HCC surveillance strategies will improve diagnostic performance compared with existing surveillance modalities alone and may provide evidence to support its inclusion in future clinical practice guidelines.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,100

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Feb 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress43%
Feb 2025Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 6, 2026

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

November 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Ultrasound, AFP, and GAAD Score as Standalone Surveillance Modalities

    To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of Ultrasound, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and the GAAD score when used individually for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Sensitivity will be calculated for each modality separately by comparing surveillance results with the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • False Positive Rate of Ultrasound, AFP, and GAAD Score as Standalone Surveillance Modalities

    To evaluate the false positive rate of Ultrasound, serum AFP, and the GAAD score when used individually for HCC surveillance. The false positive rate will be calculated for each modality separately based on surveillance results compared with the reference standard diagnosis. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Combined Ultrasound + GAAD Score for HCC Surveillance

    To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of the combined Ultrasound and GAAD score strategy for HCC surveillance. A positive surveillance result will be defined according to the prespecified combination criteria (e.g., either test positive or both tests positive, as defined in the protocol). Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • False Positive Rate of Combined Ultrasound + GAAD Score for HCC Surveillance

    To evaluate the false positive rate of the combined Ultrasound and GAAD score strategy for HCC surveillance, using the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • True Positive Rate (Sensitivity) of Combined Ultrasound + AFP for HCC Surveillance

    To evaluate the true positive rate (sensitivity) of the combined Ultrasound and serum AFP strategy for HCC surveillance, based on predefined combination criteria. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • False Positive Rate of Combined Ultrasound + AFP for HCC Surveillance

    To evaluate the false positive rate of the combined Ultrasound and serum AFP strategy for HCC surveillance, compared with the reference standard diagnosis of HCC. Unit of Measure: Proportion (percentage)

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of GAAD Compared With Ultrasound, AFP, and PIVKA-II

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of Combined Ultrasound + AFP

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Combined Ultrasound + AFP

    Over 24 months of patient follow-up

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

GAAD Score

OTHER

All enrolled participants will undergo standard hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance consisting of blood sampling and abdominal ultrasound performed every 6 months for a total follow-up period of 24 months. Blood samples will be analyzed for serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) to calculate the GAAD score, a multivariable index incorporating gender, age, AFP, and PIVKA-II. A GAAD score ≥ 2.57 will trigger a recall procedure, defined as diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. This recall procedure is conducted in addition to standard surveillance recall criteria, which include detection of a suspicious hepatic lesion measuring ≥ 1 cm on ultrasound or elevated or rising serum AFP levels (≥ 20 ng/mL).

Diagnostic Test: GAAD score

Interventions

GAAD scoreDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All enrolled participants will undergo standard hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, consisting of blood sampling and abdominal ultrasound performed every 6 months for a total follow-up period of 24 months. Blood samples will be analyzed for serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) to calculate the GAAD score, a multivariable index incorporating gender, age, AFP, and PIVKA-II. A GAAD score of ≥ 2.57 will trigger a recall procedure, defined as further diagnostic evaluation using multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. This recall procedure is performed in addition to standard surveillance recall criteria, which include detection of a suspicious hepatic lesion measuring ≥ 1 cm on ultrasound or elevated or rising serum AFP levels (≥ 20 ng/mL).

GAAD Score

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults with chronic liver disease who have an indication for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, including one or more of the following:
  • Liver cirrhosis of any etiology (e.g., chronic hepatitis B virus \[HBV\], chronic hepatitis C virus \[HCV\], metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis \[MASH\], or alcohol-related liver disease \[ALD\])
  • Non-cirrhotic chronic liver disease (e.g., HCV, MASH, or ALD) with evidence of stage F3 fibrosis
  • Chronic HBV infection with a clinical diagnosis of non-cirrhotic liver disease

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of any active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer
  • History of previously diagnosed malignancy, including prior hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • Use of vitamin K antagonists within 1 week prior to enrollment
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m²
  • Significant hepatic decompensation or Child-Pugh class C liver disease
  • Unwillingness or inability to undergo computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent or to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, Waljee AK, Singal AG. Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1706-1718.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

  • Best J, Bechmann LP, Sowa JP, Sydor S, Dechene A, Pflanz K, Bedreli S, Schotten C, Geier A, Berg T, Fischer J, Vogel A, Bantel H, Weinmann A, Schattenberg JM, Huber Y, Wege H, von Felden J, Schulze K, Bettinger D, Thimme R, Sinner F, Schutte K, Weiss KH, Toyoda H, Yasuda S, Kumada T, Berhane S, Wichert M, Heider D, Gerken G, Johnson P, Canbay A. GALAD Score Detects Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an International Cohort of Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):728-735.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

  • Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017 Jul;11(4):317-370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

  • European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. No abstract available.

  • Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA, Jou JH, Kulik LM, Agopian VG, Marrero JA, Mendiratta-Lala M, Brown DB, Rilling WS, Goyal L, Wei AC, Taddei TH. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):1922-1965. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466. Epub 2023 May 22. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fibrosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tawesak Tanwandee, MD

    Siriraj Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tawesak Tanwandee, MD

    Siriraj Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Tawesak Tanwandee, MD

    Siriraj Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Tawesak Tanwandee

    Siriraj Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: GAAD score
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2025

First Posted

January 6, 2026

Study Start

February 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the policy of the institutes.

Locations