NCT07317804

Brief Summary

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular heart disease whose prevalence increases markedly with age-approximately 2-4% in individuals aged 65 years and older, and up to 3.4% for severe AS in those over 75. Degenerative calcific AS predominates in high-income countries, whereas rheumatic disease remains a major cause in low-income regions. With global population aging, the disease burden of AS continues to rise. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR/TAVI), owing to its minimally invasive nature, has become an important treatment option for severe AS and selected aortic regurgitation patients, expanding from high-surgical-risk populations to those at intermediate and low risk. In recent years, the number of TAVR procedures in many regions has surpassed or approached that of surgical aortic valve replacement, and major clinical guidelines have elevated TAVR to a recommended standard therapy. Conventional TAVR relies on combined fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance. However, perioperative complications remain frequent in elderly and high-risk patients, particularly acute kidney injury (AKI), which significantly increases short- and long-term mortality. Contrast exposure during the procedure is a major contributor to AKI; thus, clinical practice increasingly favors strategies that minimize contrast use, such as low-dose and low-kV imaging. Elevated contrast concentration in the renal tubules increases viscosity, prolongs renal exposure, and can lead to tubular injury and renal dysfunction. Continuous radiation exposure during vascular access, device positioning, valve deployment, and post-release assessment also poses safety concerns for both patients and medical staff. Echocardiography-only guidance for TAVR has therefore emerged as an attractive alternative, with the potential to replace fluoroscopy and contrast for anatomical visualization and device positioning, thereby reducing radiation exposure and contrast-related kidney injury. However, no prospective randomized study has directly compared echocardiography-only guidance with conventional fluoroscopy-plus-echocardiography guidance, and current evidence remains preliminary. To address this gap, a randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether echocardiography-only guidance is non-inferior to combined fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance in terms of device success, while also assessing the safety, efficacy, and clinical feasibility of both approaches.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
212

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
25mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Apr 2026Jul 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 11, 2025

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 26, 2026

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2028

Expected
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2028

Last Updated

April 21, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Ultrasound-guidedPercutaneous InterventionTAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation)TAVIAortic StenosisPAN Procedurenon fluoroscopic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Device success

    Device success (at discharge,from the VARC-3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium - 3)) required the fulfillment of all of the following conditions: 1. Technical success; 2. No death; 3. No additional surgery or intervention was required due to device-related, important vascular/pathway-related complications or cardiac structural complications related to the device (excluding permanent pacemakers); 4. The valve achieved the expected performance (average transvalvular pressure difference \< 20 mmHg, peak velocity \< 3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥ 0.25, and no more than moderate-grade valve intra-aneurysmal reflux or paravalvular leakage).

    at the time of the participants' discharge up to 15 days after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Technique success

    evaluated at the time of leaving the operating room

  • Device success

    at 30 days after the procedure

  • The all-cause mortality rate

    at 30 days, 1 year after the procedure

  • Cardiovascular mortality

    at 30 days, 1 year after the procedure

  • stroke

    at 30 days, 1 year after the procedure

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Echocardiography-guided group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to the echocardiography-guided group will undergo a TAVI procedure under solely echo guidance.

Device: Echocardiographic guidance

Fluoroscopy-guided intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to the fluoroscopy-guided group will undergo a TAVI procedure under the guidance of X-ray

Device: Fluoroscopic guidance

Interventions

After detailed evaluation, patients randomized in this group will undergo TAVI procedure under guidance of fully echocardiography but any fluoroscopy in the entire process.

Echocardiography-guided group

After detailed evaluation, patients randomized in this group will undergo TAVI procedure under combined guidance of echocardiography and fluoroscopy in the entire process.

Fluoroscopy-guided intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Patients aged 70 years or older with obvious clinical symptoms or a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% due to severe aortic valve stenosis (aortic valve orifice area \< 1.0 cm² or peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s or mean transvalvular pressure ≥ 40 mmHg); or patients with obvious clinical symptoms of low blood flow and low pressure difference aortic valve stenosis (effective aortic valve orifice area \< 1.0 cm², mean transvalvular pressure difference \< 40 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%, stroke volume index \< 35 ml/m², and diagnosed as true severe aortic valve stenosis by dobutamine stress test);
  • \. Patients aged 65 years ≤ age \< 70 years with severe aortic stenosis who have surgical contraindications or high risks, or have other risk factors such as post-chest radiotherapy, liver failure, diffuse severe aortic calcification, extreme weakness, etc., or patients refuse to undergo routine open-chest surgery;
  • \. The patient's anatomical structure is suitable for TAVR and can tolerate transesophageal ultrasound;
  • \. The patient has signed the informed consent form and is willing to participate in this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Imaging (ultrasound and/or CT and/or MRI) confirmed a lesion, thrombus or calculus in the left ventricle;
  • \. Severe obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract;
  • \. Severe right ventricular dysfunction;
  • \. Acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before the procedure;
  • \. Active endocarditis history within 180 days before the procedure;
  • \. Inappropriate aortic root anatomy (such as combined aortic dissection, excessive aortic annulus, risk of coronary artery occlusion, etc.);
  • \. Severe calcification and distortion of the surgical approach;
  • \. Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 20%;
  • \. Other cardiac diseases that require concurrent treatment (such as severe mitral regurgitation, atrial fibrillation, etc.);
  • \. History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days before the procedure;
  • \. Liver cirrhosis or active liver disease;
  • \. Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance rate \< 30 mL/min) and/or undergoing renal replacement therapy;
  • \. Unable to tolerate anticoagulation therapy during or after the procedure;
  • \. Participating in other drug or device research;
  • \. Any emergency or surgical operation within 30 days before the procedure;
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Study Officials

  • Xiaopeng Hu, MD,PhD

    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Xiangbin Pan

    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2025

First Posted

January 5, 2026

Study Start

April 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2028

Last Updated

April 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations