Study Stopped
The sponsor discontinued to support the study.
Effect of Bisoprolol on Progression of Aortic Stenosis
BLAST
A Randomized Trial of Beta-blocker Therapy in Aortic Stenosis
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Aortic stenosis has been thought to be a degenerative process basically induced by long-lasting mechanical stress, and hemodynamic factors such as shear forces, acceleration of blood flow, hypertension and rapid heart rate might contribute to progression of aortic stenosis. Peak aortic jet velocity is known to be associated with clinical outcomes in mild and moderate AS, and our previous study showed that rate of progression was significantly associated with baseline aortic jet velocity in mild aortic stenosis. Because beta-blocker therapy would decrease aortic jet velocity and heart rate, it might decrease hemodynamic stress and eventually slow down the degenerative process in patients whose disease is not too advanced for therapy to be effective. The investigators hypothesized that a beta-blocker therapy would decrease the rate of progression of aortic stenosis by modifying hemodynamic factors favorably in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2012
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedJune 27, 2018
June 1, 2018
1.8 years
April 14, 2012
June 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in peak aortic jet velocity from baseline to 4 years follow-up
Change in peak aortic jet velocity from baseline to 4 years follow-up. For each patient, the change in peak aortic jet velocity is calculated as (peak aortic jet velocity at 4 year follow-up) - (peak aortic jet velocity at baseline) on Doppler echocardiography.
4 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in mean pressure gradient across aortic valve
4 years
Change in aortic valve area
4 years
Change in BNP levels
4 years
Change in E/E' ratio
4 years
Study Arms (2)
bisoprolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORbisoprolol 5mg qd
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mild to moderate aortic stenosis defined by peak velocity of aortic jet between 2.0 and 3.5 m/sec
- Untreated hypertension: systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg Treated hypertension using dihydropiridine calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARB or diuretics
- Patients received no beta-blocker therapy for more than 12 months
You may not qualify if:
- Symtomatic aortic stenosis: presence of exertional dyspnea, angina or syncope
- Planned cardiac surgery (e.g., CABG, valve repair or replacement, or aneurysmectomy) or planned major non-cardiac surgery within the study period
- Stroke or resuscitated sudden death in the past 6 months
- Evidence of congestive heart failure, or left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%
- Significant renal disease manifested by serum creatinine \> 2.0mg/dL
- History of intolerance to beta-blocker
- History of adult asthma manifested by bronchospasm in the past 6 months, or currently taking regular anti-asthmatic medication(s)
- Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
- Atrial fibrillation
- Female of child-bearing potential who do not use adequate contraception and women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Asan Medical Centerlead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Duk-Hyun Kang, M.D.
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2012
First Posted
April 17, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06