Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Comparison of Pectopexy Operations With and Without Mesh Use After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Genital apical prolapse refers to the descent of the vaginal apex, uterus, or cervix, and surgical treatment is required for adequate apical support. Laparoscopic pectopexy is a surgical method developed as an alternative to the gold standard, sacrocolpopexy, in the treatment of genital organ prolapse, especially for obese patients for whom dissection is difficult. The vaginal cuff is attached to the pectineal ligament with polypropylene mesh in the standard technique. The use of mesh is subject to serious restrictions due to complications such as mesh erosion. Surgical methods without using a mesh may be safer treatment options for patients with genital prolapse. This study aimed to compare the results of Laparoscopic Pectopexy surgery with and without the use of mesh material after hysterectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
February 2, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.2 years
December 14, 2025
January 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Apical descensus relapse rate
The ratio of women with stage 2 or greater vaginal cuff prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system.
12 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL)
Preoperative day and 12 months after surgery
Other Outcomes (2)
De novo central or lateral defect cystocele rate
12 months after surgery
De novo rectocele rate
12 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic Pectopexy without mesh
EXPERIMENTALIn this group of patients, the Laparoscopic Pectopexy operation will be performed without the use of mesh material after hysterectomy. Not using mesh will be protective against possible erosion reactions that may develop in the postoperative period. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed using the standard procedure with a uterine manipulator; after sealing the uterine arteries, the vagina is cut at the level of the uterine manipulator cuff and sutured. The vaginal cuff will be fixed to the pectineal ligament with No. 1, non-absorbable Prolene suture.
Laparoscopic Pectopexy with mesh
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this group of patients, the Laparoscopic Pectopexy operation will be performed using mesh material after hysterectomy. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed using the standard procedure with a uterine manipulator; after sealing the uterine arteries, the vagina is cut at the level of the uterine manipulator cuff and sutured. The vaginal cuff will be fixed to the pectineal ligament with polypropylene mesh.
Interventions
The vaginal cuff will be fixed to the pectineal ligament with No. 1, non-absorbable Prolene suture.
The vaginal cuff will be fixed to the pectineal ligament with polypropylene mesh.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients older than 40 years and younger than 80 years old with symptomatic uterine prolapse
- Patients who provided written consent for the surgical procedure
- Patients who do not wish to preserve their uterus
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who cannot obtain anesthesia approval for laparoscopic surgery
- Patients who have a confirmed or suspected pregnancy
- Patients who have abnormal uterine/cervical/vaginal bleeding
- Patients with biopsy-confirmed endometrial hyperplasia or cervical dysplasia
- Patients with pathology-confirmed genital cancer
- Patients undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy for any type of cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kocaeli University, School of Medicine
Köseköy, Kocaeli, 41380, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Erdem B, Salman S, Usta ZK, Bacak HB, Ozkan MD, Ceken AT, Isik EY, Kumbasar S, Gencer FK, Baghaki HS, Kacar T, Aslan GN, Bulut B. A Novel Approach for Apical Prolapse Surgery: Meshless Pectopexy (Salman's Modification). Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Aug;36(8):1701-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06107-z. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
PMID: 40167602BACKGROUNDAleksandrov A, Smith AV, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R. Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Jun;13(2):179-181. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.2.013.
PMID: 34184848BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
İsmail Bıyık, M.D.
Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Şener Gezer, MD, Associate Prof., Principal Investigator, Kocaeli University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2025
First Posted
December 29, 2025
Study Start
January 29, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share