Mechanism of Incontinence Before and After Genital Prolapse Surgery
Measuring the Mechanism of Incontinence With Urethral Pressure Reflectometry, Before and After Genital Prolapse Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since year 2003, Glostrup/Herlev Hospital has devised a novel technique, urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR), for measurements of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. UPR has been able to separate continent women from women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI, defined by involuntary leakage during increased abdominal pressure). The method stands alone in its field. 9.5 % of all women undergo genital prolapse surgery during their lives (genital prolapse is characterized by a portion of the vaginal canal protruding from the opening of the vagina). However, 10-30 % of these women develop SUI after surgery, while approximately 40 % with preoperative SUI actually experience an improvement in their condition. Efforts have been made to predict the likelihood of a patient having SUI after genital prolapse surgery; however the tests have shown disappointing positive and negative predictive values. A mid-urethral sling is gold standard for treatment of SUI and to avoid SUI after genital prolapse surgery, some clinics choose to treat all their patients with a sling, simultaneously. However, not all patients with SUI require surgery and the sling is associated with some risks, such as bleeding and bladder injury. There is no international consensus on the use of mid-urethral slings in women undergoing genital prolapse surgery. Thus, there is great need for knowledge and know-how regarding the mechanism of continence in women with genital prolapse, before and after surgery. The hypothesis is that UPR may be used to uncover the changes in the female urethra before and after genital prolapse surgery, revealing significant differences in the parameters in women who develop SUI after surgery. UPR may become an important tool in the preoperative assessment, helping clinicians give better information and guidance to their patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 18, 2015
March 1, 2015
1.9 years
January 29, 2014
March 17, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in UPR parameters before and after surgery.
The purpose is to see if and how the patients' parameters change after surgery.
Before surgery and minimum 6 weeks postoperatively.
Study Arms (2)
Anterior genital prolapse
Women with anterior genital prolapse ≥ grade 2, who are awaiting genital prolapse surgery.
Posterior genital prolapse
Women with posterior genital prolapse ≥ grade 2, who are awaiting genital prolapse surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
The suitable women are invited to volunteer at the outpatient clinic, at the Department of Gynaecology, at Herlev hospital.
You may qualify if:
- \- Women with anterior genital prolapse ≥ grade 2 (according to the pelvic-organ-prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) (19)), who are awaiting genital prolapse surgery
- \- women with posterior genital prolapse ≥ grade 2 who are awaiting genital prolapse surgery,
You may not qualify if:
- Simultaneous prolapse ≥ grade 2 in the anterior or posterior part of the vagina
- Former genital prolapse surgery
- Former surgical removal of the uterus
- Former surgical treatment of urinary incontinence
- Neurological disorder
- Bladder overactivity
- Pregnancy
- Women under the age of 18
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Herlev Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, 2730, Denmark
Related Publications (20)
Saaby ML, Klarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry during intra-abdominal pressure increase-an improved technique to characterize the urethral closure function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Nov;32(8):1103-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22368. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23532678BACKGROUNDKlarskov N. Urethral pressure reflectometry. A method for simultaneous measurements of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Dan Med J. 2012 Mar;59(3):B4412.
PMID: 22381095BACKGROUNDAagaard M, Klarskov N, Sonksen J, Bagi P, Colstrup H, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area: a study of feasibility in the prostatic urethra. BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1178-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PMID: 22416900BACKGROUNDHornung BR, Mitchell PJ, Carlson GL, Klarskov N, Lose G, Kiff ES. Comparative study of anal acoustic reflectometry and anal manometry in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1718-24. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8943.
PMID: 23132420BACKGROUNDMitchell PJ, Klarskov N, Telford KJ, Hosker GL, Lose G, Kiff ES. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new reproducible technique providing physiological assessment of anal sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1122-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318223fbcb.
PMID: 21825892BACKGROUNDAbdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, Ford J, Bhattacharya S. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000206. Print 2011.
PMID: 22102637BACKGROUNDEk M, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, Kjaeldgaard A, Rezapour M, Rudnicki M, Altman D. Urodynamic assessment of anterior vaginal wall surgery: a randomized comparison between colporraphy and transvaginal mesh. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Apr;29(4):527-31. doi: 10.1002/nau.20811.
PMID: 19731311BACKGROUNDMarinkovic SP, Stanton SL. Incontinence and voiding difficulties associated with prolapse. J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1021-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000111782.37383.e2.
PMID: 14767263BACKGROUNDMouritsen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Jun;14(2):122-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-002-1024-1. Epub 2003 Apr 26.
PMID: 12851756BACKGROUNDVisco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Cundiff G, Fine P, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
PMID: 18185903BACKGROUNDHaylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
PMID: 19941278BACKGROUNDPradhan A, Jain P, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jul;23(7):831-41. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1803-2. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22576328BACKGROUNDDwyer PL. Women with occult stress incontinence should not routinely have a mid-urethral sling with prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jul;23(7):827-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1690-6. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PMID: 22415701BACKGROUNDLensen EJ, Withagen MI, Kluivers KB, Milani AL, Vierhout ME. Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Jun;32(5):455-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22327. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
PMID: 23024012BACKGROUNDSchraffordt Koops SE, Bisseling TM, Heintz AP, Vervest HA. Prospective analysis of complications of tension-free vaginal tape from The Netherlands Tension-free Vaginal Tape study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.004.
PMID: 16021057BACKGROUNDLeruth J, Fillet M, Waltregny D. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1888-7. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PMID: 22825418BACKGROUNDRidgeway B, Barber MD. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;39(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.06.002.
PMID: 22877711BACKGROUNDEnnemoser S, Schonfeld M, von Bodungen V, Dian D, Friese K, Jundt K. Clinical relevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jul;23(7):851-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1765-4. Epub 2012 May 12.
PMID: 22581237BACKGROUNDBump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.
PMID: 8694033BACKGROUNDKlarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int. 2007 Aug;100(2):351-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06922.x. Epub 2007 May 14.
PMID: 17501964BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Niels Klarskov, MD Lecturer
University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yasmine SS Khayyami, MD
University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Herlev hospital, Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor, Ph.D. student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2014
First Posted
January 30, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03