Genital Prolapse
17
3
3
6
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
75% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
High Risk
Score: 62/100
11.8%
2 terminated out of 17 trials
75.0%
-11.5% vs benchmark
18%
3 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 6 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 6 completed trials
Clinical Trials (17)
i-Stitch for Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SSLF)
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Real-Life Use of Transabdominal Restorelle® Meshes in Apical Prolapse Repair
Ambulatory Prolapse Surgery
Safety and Performance of a Pelvic Floor Mesh Implant (LatGYNious)
Pessary Satisfaction Criteria for Urogenital Prolapse
Awareness of Gynaecologists About Role of Physical Therapy in Genital Prolapse
Modified Technique in Sacrospinous Fixation for Treatment of Apical Genital Prolapse
Abdominal Pectopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy.
Satisfaction and Long-term Anatomic Efficacy Study on Patients Who Underwent a Richter Intervention in the Obstetric and Gynecology Department of Foch Hospital Since 2008
Observing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptoms And Treatment Outcomes
Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Management
Vaginal Estriol Before and Vaginal Surgery for Prolapse
Mechanism of Incontinence Before and After Genital Prolapse Surgery
Prenatal Pelvic Floor Prevention (3PN)
National,Multicentric Randomised Study of the Correction of Genital Prolapse With Fascial Repair or Mesh-Prolift
Dynamic MRI of the Behaviour of Female Pelvic Floor