Expert Consensus on the Clinical Management of Melasma: A Delphi Method Study
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to gather expert opinions on the best ways to treat and manage melasma, a common skin condition characterized by dark patches on the face. Using a method called the Delphi Method, a group of dermatologists and other specialists will participate in several rounds of surveys to share their insights and reach a consensus on the most effective treatments and management strategies. The goal is to create a set of evidence-based guidelines that can help doctors provide more consistent, effective care for patients with melasma. The study will ensure that all experts' opinions are anonymous, and the results will be shared to improve treatment practices worldwide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
December 29, 2025
December 1, 2025
3 months
December 8, 2025
December 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Consensus on Diagnostic & therapeutic Criteria for Melasma
Establishment of expert consensus on core domains of melasma diagnosis and management measured by the proportion of statements reaching predefined consensus agreement after completion of delphi rounds
6-12 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Expert Panel
A cohort of dermatology and aesthetic medicine experts participating in a Modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations on the management of melasma
Eligibility Criteria
Target population:A purposive sample of experienced clinical dermatologists who actively manage melasma. The panel will include clinicians with diverse practice settings and geographic representation relevant to the study scope.Panel size and rationale:Target enrolment: 20-35 experts.Rationale: this size balances breadth of opinion and feasibility for iterative Delphi rounds; it is large enough to capture diverse viewpoints yet small enough to allow meaningful, anonymized feedback and analysis.Minimum required for analysis: 15 panelists
You may qualify if:
- Board-certified or equivalent dermatologist,
- Minimum of 5 years of post-certification clinical experience in the management of MELASMA,
- Willingness to participate in all Delphi rounds.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness to complete Delphi rounds.
- Lack of clinical experience with MELASMA
- Industry representatives without direct clinical practice
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Venus Research Center
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2025
First Posted
December 22, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Delphi studies do not collect patient data, medical records, biological samples, or identifiable clinical information. Experts only give opinions, not "IPD." Their responses are anonymized, and sharing identifiable expert-level responses is not required and often discouraged