Azelaic Acid 20% vs Hydroquinone 4% in Epidermal Melasma
Topical 20% Azelaic Acid Versus 4% Hydroquinone in Epidermal Melasma: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Melasma is a common skin condition that causes dark patches on the face and can significantly affect quality of life. This study compared two commonly used topical treatments, 20% azelaic acid and 4% hydroquinone, in adults with epidermal melasma. Participants with epidermal melasma were randomly assigned to receive either azelaic acid 20% or hydroquinone 4% for a period of 12 weeks. The severity of melasma was assessed at baseline and monthly using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score. Side effects such as irritation, redness, burning, itching, and dryness were also monitored throughout the study. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of azelaic acid and hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity and to determine whether azelaic acid can be used as a safe alternative to hydroquinone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
December 1, 2025
6 months
December 25, 2025
December 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) Score
The primary outcome was treatment efficacy, assessed by the change in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score from baseline to the end of the 12-week treatment period. MASI evaluates the severity of melasma based on area of involvement, darkness, and homogeneity across four facial regions.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
GroupA
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomised into two intervention groups of 73 each by paralel assignment . Group A (Azelaic Acid 20%) Description Group A Participants were assigned to 20%Azalic acid daily application for 12weeks as intervention for treatment of Melasma.
GroupB
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B (Hydroquinone 4%) Description the other grouphad also 73 participants.They were assigned to 4%Hydroquinone daily application for 12 as intervention for treatment of Melasma.
Interventions
Topical azelaic acid 20% cream was applied in intervention group to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks. The intervention is used to reduce hyperpigmentation in patients with melasma.
The other intervention isTopical application of hydroquinone 4% cream to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with clinically diagnosed epidermal melasma confirmed by Wood's lamp examination
- Male or female participants of any age
- Willingness to provide written informed consent
- Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- Active cutaneous or facial skin infection
- History of keloid formation
- Recent use of other topical or systemic depigmenting agents
- Presence of photosensitive disorders
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gujranwala Medical College Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, +92, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. Treating clinicians and study staff were aware of group assignments. The statistician analyzing the data received coded datasets and was blinded to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- 5th year resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 25, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
May 4, 2025
Primary Completion
November 3, 2025
Study Completion
November 3, 2025
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12