The Effect of Education on Quality of Life, Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy and Symptom Control in Organ Transplant Patients
The Effects of Different Educational Methods Given to Patients Undergoing Organ Transplantation on Quality of Life, Compliance With İmmunosuppressive Therapy and Symptom Control
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Organ transplantation is the most effective method for treating end-stage organ failure and allows patients on the verge of death to continue living. Organ transplantation involves removing all or part of an organ or tissue from the body and transplanting it to suitable patients experiencing failure. Therefore, transplants are performed to treat diseases, save lives, improve patients' quality of life, and extend their life expectancy. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines quality of life as individuals' perceptions of their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns regarding their place in life, within the context of the culture and value systems they live in. Achieving an adequate quality of life after transplantation is considered an indicator of therapeutic success, which is increasingly important to measure by the transplant care team. Individuals who undergo transplantation and their families often perceive transplantation as a rebirth. However, 30% to 40% of patients report no better health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation compared to dialysis. This is attributed to frequent checkups and monitoring, new medications and their strict dosing schedules, and the unexpected discomfort of potential side effects. Even after the psychological challenges of waiting and the joy of a successful transplant, transplant recipients take on new responsibilities. Problems such as accepting transplantation risks, acute and chronic organ rejection, and adherence to lifelong medication regimens can arise. Persistent side effects of various immunosuppressive agents, adaptation and maintenance of the new organ, and uncertainty about the future due to rejection of transplanted organs and the subsequent re-transplantation process can all lead to physical and psychological distress. Immunosuppressive therapy represents a lifelong endeavor for transplant recipients. These medication regimens involve complex protocols, not only due to the number of pills required, but also due to blood level monitoring, side effects, and frequent dose adjustments to avoid rejection. Non-adherence to immunosuppressant regimens has been shown to be high in organ transplant patients. Non-adherence rates in this population are reported as high as 65%. The highest immunosuppressant non-adherence rate is found in kidney transplant recipients, with a prevalence of 36-55%, while this rate is 15-40% in liver transplant recipients. Studies have found that 16-36% of graft losses are associated with non-adherence. The ever-growing population of transplant recipients and the limited number of transplant centers, particularly those living farther away, necessitate innovative healthcare delivery models to monitor and improve the use of transplant center resources. With the advent of smartphones and mobile medical devices, mobile health has become a popular way for healthcare professionals to manage patient care. Mobile health can serve as an adjunct method for delivering health education information, sending reminders to patients to take their medications, and implementing online education. In particular, converting paper-based education to video format can significantly increase knowledge on various topics. It is necessary to address the problems and challenges patients face after discharge and the practices that can potentially address these issues. These results suggest that healthcare professionals can do more to provide comprehensive care to patients, promote successful home-based treatment regimens, symptom control, and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2026
ExpectedDecember 26, 2025
December 1, 2025
3 months
December 4, 2025
December 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The effect of education on quality of life in organ transplant patients
The SF-36 Quality of Life Scale will be administered before the training intervention. Most questions on the scale use Likert-type rating scales (3, 5, and 6 points), while questions four and five can be answered with yes/no. Each section of the scale is rated between 0 and 100 points. Higher scores indicate better health, or improved quality of life ("0" for poor health, "100" for good health).
Baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention.
The effect of education on symptom control in organ transplant patients
The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale-59 will be administered before the training intervention. Each item on the scale corresponds to a side effect of immunosuppressive drugs, and these items have two dimensions that assess symptom occurrence and discomfort level. Symptom occurrence is scored from 1 to 5, with 1=never occurring and 5=always occurring. Symptom discomfort level is scored from 0 to 4, with 0=never causing discomfort and 4=causing extreme discomfort.
Baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention.
The effect of education on adherence to ımmunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant patients
The Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale in Organ Transplantation Patients will be administered before the training intervention. The scale consists of four questions, and participants can receive a score between 0 and 12. Individuals who have not forgotten their immunosuppressive treatment in the last three months are given 3 points, those with 1-20% non-adherence to immunosuppressive treatment are given 2 points, those with 21-50% non-adherence to immunosuppressive treatment are given 1 point, and those with \>50% non-adherence to immunosuppressive treatment are given 0 points.
Baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Mobile applications
EXPERIMENTALTeaching booklet
EXPERIMENTALControl
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Transplant patients will receive standard discharge training. A mobile application created by the researcher will be installed on transplant patients' phones.
Transplant patients will receive standard discharge training. Transplant patients will be given researcher prepared instructional booklet
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being over 18 years of age,
- Having undergone a liver or kidney transplant for the first time,
- Having been discharged at least three months ago,
- Having access to a smartphone and internet and the ability to use them independently,
You may not qualify if:
- Having a diagnosis of a psychiatric or neurological disorder,
- Having hearing or vision problems severe enough to impede communication,
- Requesting to leave during the research period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ondokuz Mayis University
Samsun, Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2025
First Posted
December 17, 2025
Study Start
December 10, 2025
Primary Completion
March 10, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share