NCT07285772

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate several bilayer biomimetic composite resin techniques in class I cavities over the course of 18 months in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 22, 2025

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

November 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ClinicalBiomimeticCompositeClass I

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcomes are: surface luster, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, fracture, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity.

    Clinical assessment was carried out according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) by two calibrated evaluators at baseline and at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. All of the restorations were ranked according to how well they met the criteria: clinically excellent or very satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, or clinically inadequate. Clinical success was defined as a score of 1, 2, or 3, and failure was indicated by scores of 4 or 5. A powerful light source was used to conduct the visual inspection of the parameters. A magnifying dental loupe was utilized for this purpose. The Friedman test was conducted to evaluate intragroup comparisons of the same restoration outcomes through different follow-up periods. The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to assess intergroup comparisons between different restorations during the same follow-up period.

    18 months

Study Arms (4)

EverX Posterior composite

EXPERIMENTAL

Short fiber-reinforced composite

Other: short fiber reinforced composite , long fiber reinforced composite, light cure glass, flowable composite

Ribbond

EXPERIMENTAL

Long fiber-reinforced composite

Other: short fiber reinforced composite , long fiber reinforced composite, light cure glass, flowable composite

Riva SDI

EXPERIMENTAL

glass ionomer restorative material

Other: short fiber reinforced composite , long fiber reinforced composite, light cure glass, flowable composite

G-aenial universal Flo

EXPERIMENTAL

flowable composite

Other: short fiber reinforced composite , long fiber reinforced composite, light cure glass, flowable composite

Interventions

All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).

EverX Posterior compositeG-aenial universal FloRibbondRiva SDI

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Proper oral hygiene
  • Availability for follow-up periods

You may not qualify if:

  • Endodontically treated or non-vital teeth
  • Parafunctional habits such as tooth clenching or grinding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

Tanta, Tanta, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Sailynoja E. Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth - Results of 2.5 Year Follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018 Jun 29;12:476-485. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010476. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30069257BACKGROUND
  • ElAziz RH, Mohammed MM, Gomaa HA. Clinical Performance of Short-fiber-reinforced Resin Composite Restorations vs Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Cavities of Molars (Randomized Clinical Trial). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):296-303.

    PMID: 32434978BACKGROUND
  • Metwaly AA, Elzoghby AF, Abd ElAziz RH. Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8.

    PMID: 39448991BACKGROUND
  • Mohamed MH, Abouauf EA, Mosallam RS. Clinical performance of class II MOD fiber reinforced resin composite restorations: an 18-month randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05521-5.

    PMID: 39881262BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

flowable hybrid composite

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2025

First Posted

December 16, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

October 10, 2025

Study Completion

October 10, 2025

Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations