Clinical Performance of Various Bilayer Biomimetic Resin Composite Strategies
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate several bilayer biomimetic composite resin techniques in class I cavities over the course of 18 months in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2025
CompletedDecember 16, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.8 years
November 22, 2025
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcomes are: surface luster, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, fracture, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity.
Clinical assessment was carried out according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) by two calibrated evaluators at baseline and at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. All of the restorations were ranked according to how well they met the criteria: clinically excellent or very satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, clinically satisfactory, or clinically inadequate. Clinical success was defined as a score of 1, 2, or 3, and failure was indicated by scores of 4 or 5. A powerful light source was used to conduct the visual inspection of the parameters. A magnifying dental loupe was utilized for this purpose. The Friedman test was conducted to evaluate intragroup comparisons of the same restoration outcomes through different follow-up periods. The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to assess intergroup comparisons between different restorations during the same follow-up period.
18 months
Study Arms (4)
EverX Posterior composite
EXPERIMENTALShort fiber-reinforced composite
Ribbond
EXPERIMENTALLong fiber-reinforced composite
Riva SDI
EXPERIMENTALglass ionomer restorative material
G-aenial universal Flo
EXPERIMENTALflowable composite
Interventions
All patients received four various bilayer biomimetic restorations in four groups (n = 40) as follows: Group I: short fiber reinforced composite (everX Posterior); ); Group II: long fiber reinforced composite (Ribbond Inc., USA); Group III: glass ionomer restorative materials (Riva SDI); and Group IV: flowable composite (G-aenial universal).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Proper oral hygiene
- Availability for follow-up periods
You may not qualify if:
- Endodontically treated or non-vital teeth
- Parafunctional habits such as tooth clenching or grinding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Tanner J, Tolvanen M, Garoushi S, Sailynoja E. Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth - Results of 2.5 Year Follow-up. Open Dent J. 2018 Jun 29;12:476-485. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010476. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30069257BACKGROUNDElAziz RH, Mohammed MM, Gomaa HA. Clinical Performance of Short-fiber-reinforced Resin Composite Restorations vs Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Cavities of Molars (Randomized Clinical Trial). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):296-303.
PMID: 32434978BACKGROUNDMetwaly AA, Elzoghby AF, Abd ElAziz RH. Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8.
PMID: 39448991BACKGROUNDMohamed MH, Abouauf EA, Mosallam RS. Clinical performance of class II MOD fiber reinforced resin composite restorations: an 18-month randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05521-5.
PMID: 39881262BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2025
First Posted
December 16, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
October 10, 2025
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share