NCT07491770

Brief Summary

The purpose of the 12-month clinical study was to evaluate and compare preheated, sonic-activated, and flowable composite resins used in Class V restorations.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 14, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 15, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

clinicalpreheatedHighly filled flowableSonicfillComposite Resins

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome was marginal adaptation

    Clinical assessment of marginal adaptation was carried out in accordance with the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria by two calibrated examiners at baseline and after 6, 9, and 12 months. The restorations were graded based on their compliance with the evaluation criteria as follows: score 1 (clinically excellent), score 2 (clinically satisfactory), score 3 (clinically acceptable), and scores 4 and 5 (clinically unsatisfactory). Clinical success was considered when restorations received scores of 1, 2, or 3, whereas scores of 4 or 5 were regarded as failures. Visual examination of the evaluated parameters was performed using a high-intensity light source, and a magnifying dental loupe was used to enhance observation. Intragroup comparisons of restoration outcomes across different follow-up intervals were analyzed using the Friedman test. Intergroup comparisons among the different restorative materials within the same follow-up period were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. T

    12 months

Study Arms (4)

Xtra fill composite

EXPERIMENTAL

Preheated composite resin at 54°C

Other: Preheated Nanohybrid Composite Resin (x tra fill)

SonicFill 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Sonic-activated composite

Other: Sonic-Activated Nanohybrid Composite Resin (SonicFill 2®, Kerr, USA)

G-aenial Universal Flo

EXPERIMENTAL

Highly filled flowable

Other: Highly Filled Flowable Composite Resin (G-aenial Universal Flo®, GC Corporation, Japan)

NanoPaq composite

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional nanohybrid composite

Other: Conventional Nanohybrid Composite Resin (NanoPaq®, Germany)

Interventions

A nanohybrid composite resin preheated prior to placement to improve flowability and adaptation in Class V restorations

Xtra fill composite

A sonic-activated bulk-fill nanohybrid composite (SonicFill 2®) that reduces viscosity during placement using sonic energy.

SonicFill 2

A highly filled flowable composite (G-aenial Universal Flo®) with improved mechanical properties compared to conventional flowables

G-aenial Universal Flo

A standard nanohybrid composite (NanoPaq®) used according to manufacturer instructions without modification

NanoPaq composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Good general and oral health
  • Vital teeth
  • Class V cavities with depth ranging from 2 to 3 mm

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-vital or restored teeth
  • Para functional habits (e.g., bruxism)
  • pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

Tanta, Tanta, 31527, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Badr C, Spagnuolo G, Amenta F, Khairallah C, Mahdi SS, Daher E, Battineni G, Baba NZ, Zogheib T, Qasim SSB, Daher T, Chintalapudi N, Zogheib CM. A Two-Year Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of a Nanohybrid Composite Resin to a Flowable Composite Resin. J Funct Biomater. 2021 Sep 9;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/jfb12030051.

  • Goda B, Hamdi K, Eltoukhy RI, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Clinical performance of different bulk-fill composite resin systems in class II cavities: A 2-year randomized clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Aug;36(8):1122-1137. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13212. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

  • Aref A, Abd-Elhakim S, Riad M. 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial assessment of surface texture, color stability, and marginal discoloration of sonic activated bulk-fill resin composite according to USPHS and FDI criteria. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1261. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06611-0.

  • Demirel G, Orhan AI, Irmak O, Aydin F, Buyuksungur A, Bilecenoglu B, Orhan K. Effects of Preheating and Sonic Delivery Techniques on the Internal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent. 2021 Mar 1;46(2):226-233. doi: 10.2341/19-241-L.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2026

First Posted

March 24, 2026

Study Start

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 10, 2026

Study Completion

March 14, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations