Composite Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars With or Without Pulpotomy. Prospective 24 Month Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After 24 months:
- Investigation of the success rate of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy.
- Comparison of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy with restorations of the same type in the same patient, in which no pulpotomy has been performed. The null hypothesis of the study is that there is no statistically significant difference in the success of Class II resin restorations after their placement in primary molars, regardless of whether a pulpotomy has been performed or not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedNovember 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
2 years
November 17, 2025
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Modified USPHS criteria
Modified USPHS criteria are variations of the original United States Public Health Service criteria used in dentistry to clinically evaluate restorations. They include the following criteria: marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, and secondary caries, with specific parameters and scoring scales adjusted for a particular study or material being evaluated. These modifications allow for a more precise assessment of dental restorations by tailoring the evaluation to specific clinical situations or restorative materials
Assessment is done at 12 and 24 months following placement of the composite restoration
Study Arms (2)
Class II composite restoration on primary teeth with pulpotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORClass II composite restoration on primary teeth without pulpotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. After pulpotomy completion with a layer of MTA®, an intermediate layer of glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond Plus™) is placed before the final composite resin restoration. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy children aged 3-9 years
- At least one pulpotomy in a carious primary molar requiring a Class II resin restoration
- At least one Class II cavity in a carious primary molar in the same patient that requires a resin restoration
- The teeth to be restored must not present clinical signs of pulp necrosis, such as pathological mobility or abscess/fistula
- Parents have signed an informed consent form
- The young patients return for evaluation at 12 and 24 months
- There is no exfoliation or extraction of the evaluated teeth before the 24-month period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lygidakis Dental Clinic
Athens, 11528, Greece
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 24, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share