C-MAC Video Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Intubation
A Comparison of the D Blade and Mac Blade C-MAC Video Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Normal Airways
1 other identifier
interventional
252
1 country
1
Brief Summary
. The study aimed to compare the C-MAC D-Blade (Group D) and the C-MAC Macintosh blade (Group M) with the conventional direct laryngoscopy macintosh blade (Group DL) in patients with predicted normal airways undergoing thoracic surgery requiring double lumen tube (DLT) placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2025
CompletedDecember 16, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.3 years
December 1, 2025
December 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
intubation time
DLT insertion time was defined as the period from when the intubation device passed the patient's lips until three complete end-tidal carbon dioxide cycles were displayed on the monitor
up to 10 minutes after intubation from recording
Study Arms (3)
Group D blade
ACTIVE COMPARATORDLT (with the stylet in place) was molded along the blade convexity, and sequential rotation was performed for insertion. After the bronchial lumen tip engaged the glottis, the stylet was removed, and the DLT was rotated 180° counterclockwise to facilitate passage of the bronchial cuff. The DLT was then rotated 90° clockwise to ensure it entered the left main bronchus
Group M
ACTIVE COMPARATORonce the bronchial cuff had passed through the vocal cords, the double-lumen tube was inserted using the conventional method
Group DL (Direct laryngoscopy macintosch blade, conventional . placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORonce the bronchial cuff had passed through the vocal cords, the double-lumen tube was inserted using the conventional method
Interventions
videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly used in thoracic surgery, particularly in patients with difficult airways, as they enhance visualization of laryngeal structures and facilitate lung separationThe D-blade and Mac blade are adapted for use with the C-MAC system.10 The C-MAC Mac and D-blade may be a viable alternative to direct laryngoscopy with the Mac blade in routine practice.
In patients without predicted difficult airways undergoing thoracic surgery, direct laryngoscopy with a Mac blade remains the recommended technique for DLT placement
videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly used in thoracic surgery, particularly in patients with difficult airways, as they enhance visualization of laryngeal structures and facilitate lung separation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III,
- Patients requiring one-lung ventilation via DLT intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of difficult endotracheal intubation or mask ventilation,
- Patients with severe pulmonary ventilation dysfunction,
- Patients with a risk of pulmonary aspiration patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Inonu Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
inonu University
Malatya, Battalgazi, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yeliz tunc ozer, doctor
Inonu University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 16, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share