NCT04701762

Brief Summary

The investigators will evaluate the endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy versus conventional direct laryngoscopy on intubation success, quantified by the number of intubation attempts. The question is important because video laryngoscopes are more expensive than conventional direct laryngoscopes. The additional cost might be justified if video systems improve intubation success and reduce airway trauma. But if they do not, the extra cost would not be justified

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7,736

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2020

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 23, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 23, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

December 22, 2020

Results QC Date

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

AirwayVideolaryngoscopeDirect Laryngoscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Number of Intubation Attempts With the Initial Laryngoscopy Instrument.

    Intubation attempts is defined as introduction and subsequent removal of a laryngoscope blade into the oral cavity whether or not the trachea was intubated.

    From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery up to 24 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Intubation Failure

    From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery.

  • Any Dental or Airway Injury

    From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery.

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Maximum Mean Arterial Pressure

    In five minutes after intubation.

  • Maximum Heart Rate (HR)

    In five minutes after intubation

Study Arms (2)

videolaryngoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

Initial intubation performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Device: GlideScope videolaryngoscope (Verathon, Bothell, Washington 98011)

conventional direct laryngoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Initial intubation performed using direct laryngoscopy.

Device: Direct laryngoscopy

Interventions

After confirming adequate muscle relaxation, initial laryngoscopy will be performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscope with an appropriately sized blade (usually size 3 or 4). The GlideScope (Verathon, Bothell, Washington 98011) is an FDA-cleared commercially available portable videolaryngoscope.

videolaryngoscopy

After confirming adequate muscle relaxation, initial laryngoscopy will be performed using direct laryngoscopy with an appropriately sized Macintosh or Miller blade (usually size 3 or 4);

conventional direct laryngoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Elective or emergent surgery requiring oral endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

You may not qualify if:

  • The attending anesthesiologist prefers a specific approach for a particular patient
  • Awake fiberoptic intubation is clinically indicated
  • Insertion of double-lumen tube.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ruetzler K, Bustamante S, Schmidt MT, Almonacid-Cardenas F, Duncan A, Bauer A, Turan A, Skubas NJ, Sessler DI; Collaborative VLS Trial Group. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1279-1286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0762.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kurt Ruetzler
Organization
Cleveland Clinic

Study Officials

  • Kurt Ruetzler, MD

    The Cleveland Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Cluster randomized multiple crossover design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2020

First Posted

January 8, 2021

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 23, 2022

Study Completion

December 23, 2022

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Results First Posted

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations