Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
7,736
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will evaluate the endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy versus conventional direct laryngoscopy on intubation success, quantified by the number of intubation attempts. The question is important because video laryngoscopes are more expensive than conventional direct laryngoscopes. The additional cost might be justified if video systems improve intubation success and reduce airway trauma. But if they do not, the extra cost would not be justified
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 23, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.8 years
December 22, 2020
March 18, 2024
August 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Intubation Attempts With the Initial Laryngoscopy Instrument.
Intubation attempts is defined as introduction and subsequent removal of a laryngoscope blade into the oral cavity whether or not the trachea was intubated.
From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery up to 24 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intubation Failure
From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery.
Any Dental or Airway Injury
From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery.
Other Outcomes (2)
Maximum Mean Arterial Pressure
In five minutes after intubation.
Maximum Heart Rate (HR)
In five minutes after intubation
Study Arms (2)
videolaryngoscopy
EXPERIMENTALInitial intubation performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
conventional direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial intubation performed using direct laryngoscopy.
Interventions
After confirming adequate muscle relaxation, initial laryngoscopy will be performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscope with an appropriately sized blade (usually size 3 or 4). The GlideScope (Verathon, Bothell, Washington 98011) is an FDA-cleared commercially available portable videolaryngoscope.
After confirming adequate muscle relaxation, initial laryngoscopy will be performed using direct laryngoscopy with an appropriately sized Macintosh or Miller blade (usually size 3 or 4);
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective or emergent surgery requiring oral endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- The attending anesthesiologist prefers a specific approach for a particular patient
- Awake fiberoptic intubation is clinically indicated
- Insertion of double-lumen tube.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ruetzler K, Bustamante S, Schmidt MT, Almonacid-Cardenas F, Duncan A, Bauer A, Turan A, Skubas NJ, Sessler DI; Collaborative VLS Trial Group. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1279-1286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0762.
PMID: 38497992DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kurt Ruetzler
- Organization
- Cleveland Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kurt Ruetzler, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2020
First Posted
January 8, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 23, 2022
Study Completion
December 23, 2022
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08