Efficacy of Three Gingival Displacement Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find the best gingival displacement method for taking impressions of artificial full crowns with subgingival margins. The main question it aims to answer is: Which of the three common gingival displacement methods works best? Researchers will compare three methods: gingival retraction cord, gingival retraction paste, and gingival retraction cord + hemostatic gel, to see which is optimal. Participants will: Receive one of the three gingival displacement treatments during impression taking. Fill out a VAS form to rate their pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
December 15, 2025
December 1, 2025
7 months
November 24, 2025
December 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
horizontal sulcus width of gingival displacement
After tooth preparation, gingival displacement material was applied to each group and then silicone impressions were taken using the two-step impression technique, and die stone models were poured.The horizontal displacement width of the sulcus was measured on the cast, defined as the linear distance between the margin of the prepared tooth and the adjacent gingival replica on the cast. The mearsurement procedure was carried out with an optical microscope.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
gingival sulcus bleeding
baseline
patient- reported pain
baseline
Study Arms (3)
gingival retration cord
EXPERIMENTALgive the patients in this group the gingival displacemet treatment with retraction cord
gingival retraction paste
EXPERIMENTALgive the patients in this group the gingival displacemet treatment with retraction paste
gingival retration cord+ hemostatic gel
EXPERIMENTALgive the patients in this group the gingival displacemet treatment with retraction cord impregnated with hemostatic gel
Interventions
After tooth preparation, the prepared abutment tooth was rinsed and dried. A preliminary impression was taken using heavy-body silicone. An appropriately sized retraction cord (Ultrapak, #000-#0) was selected and gently packed into the gingival sulcus of the prepared tooth using a cord packer. The cord was left in the gingival sulcus for 7-8 minutes. Following cord removal, light-body silicone was immediately injected around the gingival sulcus of the prepared abutment tooth and into the preliminary impression tray, followed by seating of the preliminary impression tray to obtain the final impression.
After tooth preparation, the prepared abutment tooth was rinsed and dried. A preliminary impression was taken using heavy-body silicone. Retraction paste was injected into the gingival sulcus surrounding the prepared abutment tooth. The retraction paste was left in place for 2 minutes per the manufacturer's instructions, then thoroughly rinsed, and the prepared abutment tooth was air-dried. Light-body silicone was immediately injected around the gingival sulcus and into the preliminary impression tray, followed by seating of the preliminary impression tray to obtain the final impression.
Appropriately sized retraction cords (Ultrapak, sizes #000-#0) were pre-soaked in hemostatic gel prior to use. After tooth preparation, the prepared abutment tooth was rinsed and dried. A preliminary impression was taken using heavy-body silicone. The gel-soaked retraction cords were gently packed into the gingival sulcus using a cord packer. After 7-8 minutes, the cords were removed, followed by rinsing and drying of the prepared abutment tooth. Light-body silicone was immediately injected around the gingival sulcus and into the preliminary impression tray, followed by seating of the preliminary impression tray to obtain the final impression.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- need for single crown restoration of maxillary anterior teeth, healthy periodontal status, and subgingival preparation margins on the buccal surface of the affected teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- requirement for more than one restoration, restoration in other dental quadrants, and supragingival preparation margins.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
department of stomatology, Henan provincial people's hospital, People's hospital Henan university.
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2025
First Posted
December 15, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share