Assessment of the Number of Missing Tooth Surfaces and the Molecular Findings on the Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Using Two Calcium Silicate Materials
VPT
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of full pulpotomy in mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis according to: A. Number of tooth surfaces defects:
- Class I cavity defect.
- Class II cavity defect. B. Using two types of pulpotomy dressing materials:
- MTA+ (Cerkamed, Stalowa, Poland).
- Well-Root PT (Vericom, Gangwon-Do, Korea). And., To correlate this outcome to the quantification of two biomolecules:
- Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-⍺).
- Matrix metalloproteinases-9 (MMP-9). Based on the results of the present study, it was concluded that:
- Full pulpotomy using calcium silicate cements (CSCs) is considered a conservative, economical, and simple treatment option with a favorable prognosis for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
- Class I and class II cavity defects do not adversely affect pulpotomy prognosis taking into consideration good aseptic condition, magnification, and proper seal of filling materials.
- Although MTA+ and Well-Root PT yielded similar outcomes for pulpotomy in terms of success rates. Well-root PT is easier to handle compared to MTA+ and doesn't have a discoloration effect which is considered one of the drawbacks associated with MTA+.
- Neither the preoperative pain nor the intraoperative bleeding time within 10 minutes influenced the pulpotomy outcome.
- The concentration of TNF-α and MMP-9 biomarkers directly impact the outcome of pulpotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2025
CompletedJune 5, 2025
June 1, 2025
1 year
January 16, 2025
June 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
success/failure
Treatment was considered successful (healed) according to Zanini et al. (2016) based on the following criteria: (Clinically) absence of signs and symptoms of pulpal pathosis, no history of spontaneous pain or discomfort on chewing, no tenderness to percussion/palpation, no soft tissue swelling, fistula, or abnormal mobility. (Radiographically) absence of periapical rarefaction (normal width of periodontal ligament space and normal appearance of the lamina dura), internal or external resorption, and absence of root canal calcification
Patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments (one week, 3, 6, and 12 months)
Pain assessment
Pre-treatment, the patients were instructed on how to fill out a visual analog scale VAS to determine their pain score. Postoperative pain was recorded by the patient every 24 hours in the evening for 7 days. The VAS included scores from 0 to 10, which were further categorized as no pain (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), severe (7-9), or severe intolerable (10).
every 24 hours in the evening for 7 days
Study Arms (2)
A. Number of tooth surfaces defects: • Class I cavity defect. • Class II cavity defect.
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe selected patients were divided into two groups according to the number of tooth surfaces defects (n=30) (30 with class I and 30 with class II cavity defects)
pulpotomy dressing materials: • MTA+ (Cerkamed, Poland). • Well-Root (Vericom, Korea).
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach group was randomly further subdivided using Microsoft Excel into two subgroups according to the dressing materials, without informing the patients which type of material was used (n=15).
Interventions
access to dental pulp chamber under aseptic condition, collect blood sample using a micropipette for ELIZA test, stop bleeding using sodium hypochlorite 2.5%, pulpotomy dressing material over pulp stump and final restoration with resign modified glass ionomer and composite resign
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mandibular molar teeth with signs and symptoms of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis without radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis.
- Age range of 21-45 years old.
- Males or females.
- No disabilities.
- Class I and/or class II cavity defects.
- Teeth reveal positive response to cold tests.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of open apices.
- Non-restorable teeth.
- Teeth in which the pulpal bleeding time is more than 10 minutes.
- Presence of large carious lesions approaching the root.
- Presence of calcification or resorption.
- Periodontally affected teeth.
- Patients who are taking antibiotics within one week before treatment.
- Patients consumed taking analgesics within 24 hours before treatment.
- Systemically compromised patients.
- Pregnant females.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University
Ismailia, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dalia Mukhtar Fayyad, Professor of endodontics
Suez Canal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- did not inform the patients which type of material was used, All laboratory procedures were performed by a single, experienced individual specializing in biochemical assays, without informing the biochemist of any outcome data of pulpotomy
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2025
First Posted
January 22, 2025
Study Start
September 21, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
June 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06