Key Insights

Highlights

Success Rate

100% trial completion (above average)

Treatment Research

6 treatments under study, led by Gingival Retraction Paste

Clinical Risk Assessment

Based on trial outcomes

Moderate Risk

Score: 50/100

Termination Rate

0.0%

0 terminated out of 3 trials

Success Rate

100.0%

+13.4% vs benchmark

Late-Stage Pipeline

0%

0 trials in Phase 3/4

Results Transparency

0%

0 of 1 completed with results

Key Signals

100% success

Data Visualizations

Phase Distribution

2Total
Not Applicable (1)
Phase 1 (1)

Trial Status

Enrolling By Invitation1
Completed1
Unknown1

Trial Success Rate

100.0%

Benchmark: 86.6%

Based on 1 completed trials

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07282977Not ApplicableEnrolling By Invitation

Efficacy of Three Gingival Displacement Methods

NCT06912503CompletedPrimary

Comparison of Trial Restoration Matrix Fabrication Methods

NCT04563624Phase 1UnknownPrimary

Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up

Showing all 3 trials

Research Network

Common Treatments

  • Gingival Retraction Paste1
  • Ceramic Cad Cam Blocks1
  • Gingival Retraction Cord1
  • Composite Blocks1
  • Device To Deliver Trial Restoration Matrix1

Active Sponsors

  • Cairo University1
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya1
  • Henan Provincial People's Hospital1

Top Investigators

Related Conditions

  • Tooth Defect1

Activity Timeline