Loading search results
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Charcoal-impregnated Toothbrushes: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Study Start
April 16, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 11, 2025
Actual (reported)This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the antibacterial effectiveness of toothbrushes with charcoal-impregnated bristles compared to conventional toothbrushes without charcoal. The main objective is to assess and compare the microbial contamination on the toothbrushes after 21 days of use. Thirty-two healthy dental students from the Faculty of Dental Medicine of Rabat (16 males and 16 females, aged 18-24) were enrolled through convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A: Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrushes with charcoal-impregnated bristles. Group B: Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrushes without charcoal (control group). Participants brushed their teeth twice daily for two minutes using the rolling technique and a standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). They were instructed not to use mouthwash or antiseptic toothpaste, to rinse brushes only with tap water (without touching the bristles), to store them vertically with bristles facing upward, and to keep them uncovered and at least one meter away from toilets. After 21 days, used toothbrushes were collected in sterile pouches and transferred to the microbiology laboratory. A quarter of the bristles from each brush head was aseptically cut, immersed in sterile saline solution, and vortexed to dislodge microorganisms. Aliquots of 200 µL were inoculated onto blood agar (Columbia agar base enriched with sterile blood). After incubation at 37°C for 48 hours, colony-forming units (CFU) were manually counted to estimate microbial contamination levels (CFU/mL). Clinical data (Silness and Löe plaque index, Löe and Silness gingival index, and DMF index) were collected at baseline. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi software. The comparison of CFU counts between groups aimed to determine whether charcoal impregnation reduces microbial contamination of toothbrush bristles. This study involves minimal risk and no investigational drug or device. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dental Medicine of Rabat.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 11, 2025
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 16, 2025
Actual (reported)May 30, 2025
Actual (reported)June 11, 2025
Actual (reported)November 28, 2025
Actual (reported)December 10, 2025
Actual (reported)Reduction of microbial contamination on toothbrush bristles
The primary outcome is the number of colony-forming units (CFU/mL) measured on toothbrush bristles after 21 days of use. A quarter of the bristles from each brush is cut and placed in sterile saline, vortexed to create a suspension, and 200 µL is inoculated on blood agar plates. Plates are incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, and CFU are counted manually. This outcome assesses the effectiveness of charcoal-impregnated bristles in reducing microbial contamination compared to conventional toothbrushes.
21 days
Participants use a Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush with charcoal-impregnated bristles twice daily for 2 minutes using the rolling technique. They use standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm) and follow instructions for proper storage: vertical position, bristles up, uncovered, at least 1-2 meters from toilets. Participants record their daily brushing in a standardized log sheet.
Participants use a Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush without charcoal twice daily for 2 minutes using the rolling technique. They use the same standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm) and follow the same storage and logging instructions as Arm 1.
Participants use the Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush with charcoal bristles as described in Arm 1. Daily brushing is twice for 2 minutes, using the rolling technique, with standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). Proper storage instructions and daily log recording are followed.
Participants use the Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush without charcoal bristles as described in Arm 2. Daily brushing is twice for 2 minutes, using the rolling technique, with standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). Proper storage instructions and daily log recording are followed.
Faculty of Dental Medicine of Rabat, Mohammed V University
Rabat, Al Irfane, 6212, Morocco
32 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
November 28, 2025
First Posted
December 10, 2025
Study Start
April 16, 2025
Actual (reported)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 11, 2025
Actual (reported)Last Updated
December 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: