Interrupted vs Subcuticular Sutures With Drain in Open Appendectomy
Simple Interrupted Skin Sutures Versus Subcuticular Suture Plus Subcutaneous Drain for Wound Outcomes After Open Appendectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare wound outcomes between two closure strategies after open appendectomy:
- Determine whether the combined subcuticular closure with drain reduces the incidence of superficial surgical- site infection (SSI) within 30 days compared with interrupted sutures.
- Evaluate the effect of both techniques on secondary outcomes, including seroma or abscess formation, wound dehiscence, post-operative pain, cosmetic appearance of the scar, length of hospital stay, and drain-related adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
December 10, 2025
December 1, 2025
1 year
November 19, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of superficial surgical-site infection (SSI)
Incidence of superficial surgical-site infection (SSI) after open appendectomy, defined according to CDC/NHSN criteria (purulent drainage, positive culture, or surgeon diagnosis).
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of other wound-related complications
30 days
Postoperative pain
at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7-10days
Study Arms (1)
subcuticular suture plus subcutaneous drain
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Subcuticular suture plus subcutaneous drain uses a continuous absorbable subcuticular stitch combined with a drain placed in the subcutaneous layer to reduce dead space and fluid collection-offering both cosmetic closure and added infection-prevention compared with standard skin-only techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 14 years (or per local ethics), undergoing open appendectomy for acute appendicitis (elective not included).
- Skin incision for open appendectomy (McBurney/Gridiron or Lanz).
- Patient (or legal guardian) able and willing to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Laparoscopic appendectomy or conversion to laparoscopic approach.
- Previous abdominal surgery at the same site (risk of altered wound healing).
- Pre-existing skin infection at the surgical site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Danwang C, Bigna JJ, Tochie JN, Mbonda A, Mbanga CM, Nzalie RNT, Guifo ML, Essomba A. Global incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034266.
PMID: 32075838RESULTAllegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, Abbas M, Atema JJ, Gans S, van Rijen M, Boermeester MA, Egger M, Kluytmans J, Pittet D, Solomkin JS; WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e276-e287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PMID: 27816413RESULTIshinuki T, Shinkawa H, Kouzu K, Shinji S, Goda E, Ohyanagi T, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Suzuki K, Kitagawa Y, Yamashita C, Mohri Y, Shimizu J, Uchino M, Haji S, Yoshida M, Ohge H, Mayumi T, Mizuguchi T. Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2879-2889. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2879.
PMID: 38222020RESULTAndrade LA, Munoz FY, Baez MV, Collazos SS, de Los Angeles Martinez Ferretiz M, Ruiz B, Montes O, Woolf S, Noriega JG, Aparicio UM, Gonzalez IG. Appendectomy Skin Closure Technique, Randomized Controlled Trial: Changing Paradigms (ASC). World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3607-x.
PMID: 27283187RESULTImamura K, Adachi K, Sasaki R, Monma S, Shioiri S, Seyama Y, Miura M, Morikawa Y, Kaneko T. Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Dec;20(12):2083-2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3283-z. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
PMID: 27699563RESULTBhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
PMID: 26460662RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Docter
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2025
First Posted
December 10, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12