Effect of Different Suture Techniques on Early Healing of Peri-implant Soft Tissue
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purposes of this study are to compare the blood perfusion and early healing of horizontal mattress suture with vertical mattress sutures following open-flap implant surgery. Patients wanting single implant replacement in esthetic area will be recruited. This is a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. Noninvasive procedures will be used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Inclusion Criteria: With sufficient bone width (≥6mm), With mesial-distal distance over 8mm, age over 18, Willing to participate Exclusion Criteria: Patients want multiple adjacent implant replacements in esthetic area, Untreated periodontitis, Smokers, Diabetes mellitus
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedJanuary 17, 2023
January 1, 2023
6 months
March 6, 2022
January 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blood perfusion volume (PU) change during the observation period
LEA measurement
Immediate after anesthesia;Immediate after suture;1hour after surgery;2hour after surgery;6hour after surgery;24hour after surgery;72hour after surgery;7days after surgery;14ddays after surgery;30days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Blood flow velocity change during the observation period
Immediate after anesthesia;Immediate after suture;1 hour after surgery;2hour after surgery;6hour after surgery;24hour after surgery;72hour after surgery;7 days after surgery;14days after surgery;30days after surgery
Hemoglobin count change during the observation period
Immediate after anesthesia;Immediate after suture;1 hour after surgery;2hour after surgery;6hour after surgery;24hour after surgery;72hour after surgery;7 days after surgery;14days after surgery;30days after surgery
Blood oxygen saturation change during the observation period
Immediate after anesthesia;Immediate after suture;1 hour after surgery;2hour after surgery;6hour after surgery;24hour after surgery;72hour after surgery;7 days after surgery;14days after surgery;30days after surgery
Three-dimensional soft-tissue volumetric changes during the observation period
1. Intra-oral scanning: before surgery;Immediate after suture;1 hour after surgery;2hour after surgery;6hour after surgery;24hour after surgery;72hour after surgery;7 days after surgery;14days after surgery;30 day after surgery
Changes in clinical wound healing score during the observation period
24h after surgery;72h after surgery;7 days after surgery;14days after surgery;30 days after surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
test group
EXPERIMENTALvertical mattress suture
control group
OTHERhorizontal mattress suture
Interventions
For a wound that is deeper in nature, a mattress stitch can be placed, providing better strength. Mattress sutures can be applied as vertical or horizontal subtypes. So far, various studies have compared the effect of horizontal mattress suture (HMS) with vertical mattress suture (VMS) on wound healing in different wound. However, limited studies have evaluated the effect of the subtype of mattress sutures on the early wound healing and microcirculation changes of peri-implant soft tissues following implant surgery using Laser Doppler flowmetry. The test group use vertical mattress suture and the control group use the horizontal mattress suture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 and above
- Subjects want single implant treatment in esthetic area (premolar to premolar) in maxilla
- With sufficient bone width (≥6mm)
- With mesial-distal distance over 8mm
- Evidence of subject ability to achieve good oral hygiene and control periodontitis in the whole of the dentition (FMPS\<20% and FMBS\<20%)
- Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study. Ability and willingness to give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects want multiple adjacent implant treatment
- Patients with inadequate bone volume where major bone augmentation would be required at implant location.
- Subjects with untreated periodontitis
- Current smokers
- Subjects with diabetes mellitus.
- Pregnant females
- Participation in another intervention trial
- Inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Marsidi N, Vermeulen SAM, Horeman T, Genders RE. Measuring Forces in Suture Techniques for Wound Closure. J Surg Res. 2020 Nov;255:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.033. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
PMID: 32543379RESULTMontanez A, Makarewich CA, Burks RT, Henninger HB. The Medial Stitch in Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: Vertical or Horizontal Mattress? Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2225-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546516648680. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
PMID: 27281277RESULTMaemura K, Mataki Y, Kurahara H, Tanoue K, Kawasaki Y, Ijichi T, Iino S, Ueno S, Shinchi H, Natsugoe S. The 1-year outcomes after pancreaticogastrostomy using vertical versus horizontal mattress suturing for gastric wrapping. Surg Today. 2021 Apr;51(4):511-519. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02134-z. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PMID: 32968859RESULTWachtel H, Schenk G, Bohm S, Weng D, Zuhr O, Hurzeler MB. Microsurgical access flap and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jun;30(6):496-504. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00013.x.
PMID: 12795787RESULTBurkhardt R, Lang NP. Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x.
PMID: 20070747RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Maurizio S. Tonetti, Professor
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2022
First Posted
March 21, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
January 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share