Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Intradermal for the Skin Transverse Section in Cesarean
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Context: Cesarean section is the most common surgery in women, both in developed and underdeveloped countries. However results are conflicting report in which material for intradermal suturing get better aesthetic result. Objective: To compare the aesthetic appearance of two suture materials, polyglecaprone 25 and polyamide (nylon) with intradermal sutures for skin closure in women undergoing cesarean section first. Methods: This is a clinical, prospective and randomized study which was conducted in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of a tertiary Institute, Hospital das Clinicas Samuel Libânio, in PousoAlegre, Estate of Minas Gerais. Sixty women undergoing cesarean section were first included and randomized into two groups: group I (n = 30) polyamide and group II (n = 30) polyglecaprone 25. Hypertrophy, color and width of the wound were evaluated, receiving a score, according to Trimbos table, six months after surgery. Later the results were compared to non-parametric statistical tests
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2016
CompletedJuly 20, 2016
July 1, 2016
9 months
July 18, 2016
July 18, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Photographic documentation for evaluation
The photographic record was sent to three experts for evaluation of hypertrophy and cross marks staining points, according Trimboset al.,1993
6 Months
Photographic documentation for evaluation
The photographic record was sent to another expert for evaluation of hypertrophy and cross marks staining points, according Trimboset al.,1993, besides scar mesure
6 Months
Study Arms (2)
suture with polyglecaprone 25
ACTIVE COMPARATORsuture with polyamide (nylon)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
At the end of surgical procedemento of cesarean delivery , for skin closure continuous suture was performed with polyglecaprone 25
At the end of surgical procedemento of cesarean delivery , for skin closure continuous suture was performed with polyamide (nylon)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent cesarean section
- No restriction of ethnicity, education or social class
You may not qualify if:
- Scarring Pfannenstiel prior
- Diabetic patients using drugs;
- Patients with collagen diseases
- Patients with pre operative tests to indicate any systemic sign of infection or site, not previously treated until the time of surgery.
- Patients who withdrew informed consent
- Patients who did not attend the pre scheduled dates for the controls after surgery .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio
Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, 37550-000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2016
First Posted
July 20, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07