NCT07273604

Brief Summary

This study evaluated the efficacy of two structured psychological interventions for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The main goal was to determine whether a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based program and a Psychophysiological Regulation Therapy (PRT) improved emotional well-being and cognitive functioning compared with Standard Care (SC). A total of 140 participants with mild to moderate disability and disease duration between 5.5 and 8.5 years were randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBT, PRT, or SC (waiting list). Each intervention was delivered in small groups over 12 weekly sessions. Assessments were conducted before and after treatment using validated clinical and neuropsychological measures. Results were analyzed to explore the effectiveness of both interventions in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms and enhancing cognitive performance. The study aimed to provide evidence for the inclusion of psychological therapies as complementary treatments in comprehensive care for multiple sclerosis patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2019

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2025

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

November 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Multiple SclerosisRelapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisCognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychophysiological Regulation TherapyAnxietyDepressionCognitive ImpairmentEmotional Well-beingQuality of LifeFatigueRandomized Controlled TrialPsychological Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) - Total Score

    Description: Change in fatigue severity measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; Krupp et al., 1989). Scale range: 9-63 points (9 items scored 1-7). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) - Total and Subscale Scores

    Description: Change in quality of life measured with the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54; Vickrey, Hays, Harooni, Myers \& Ellison, 1995), including physical and mental health composite scores and individual subscales. Scale range: 0-100 points. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ) - Total Score

    Description: Change in perceived cognitive functioning measured with the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ; Benedict et al., 2003). Scale range: 0-60 points. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived cognitive impairment.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Verbal Selective Reminding Test (SRT) - Total Recall Score

    Change in verbal learning and memory performance measured with the Verbal Selective Reminding Test (SRT), part of the BRB-N (Rao, 1990). (Scale range 0-72). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • 10/36 Spatial Recall Test (SPART) - Total Recall Score

    Description: Change in visuospatial learning and memory measured with the 10/36 Spatial Recall Test (SPART), part of the BRB-N (Rao, 1990). Scale range: 0-36. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) - 3-Second Version

    Description: Change in complex attention and working memory measured with the PASAT (3-second version), part of the BRB-N (Rao, 1990). Scale range: 0-60 correct responses. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Oral Version

    Description: Change in attention and processing speed measured with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), part of the BRB-N (Rao, 1990). Scale range: 0-110 correct responses. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) - Semantic Fluency ("Animals" Category)

    Description: Change in semantic verbal fluency measured with the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Semantic Fluency subtest (animals category). Scale range: Number of correct animals named in 60 seconds (typically 0-40). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) - Phonemic Fluency (F-A-S Letters)

    Description: Change in phonemic verbal fluency measured with the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Phonemic Fluency subtest (letters F, A, and S). Scale range: Total number of correct words generated across the three letters in 60 seconds each (typically 0-60). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A)

    Description: Change in anxiety symptoms measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A; Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983). Scale range: 0-21 points. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) - Total Score

    Description: Change in depressive symptoms measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck et al., 1996). Scale range: 0-63 points. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater depressive severity.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Inventario de Situaciones y Respuestas de Ansiedad (ISRA) - Total Score

    Description: Change in cognitive, physiological, and motor anxiety responses measured with the Inventario de Situaciones y Respuestas de Ansiedad (ISRA; Miguel-Tobal \& Cano-Vindel, 1994). Scale range: 0-100+ (higher scores = greater anxiety response). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater anxiety reactivity.

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Recent Life Changes Questionnaire (RLCQ) - Total Score

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) - Global Severity Index (GSI)

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Cognitive Triad Inventory (CTI) - Total Score

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) - Total Score

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ-6) - Total Score

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Disease-Modifying and Symptomatic Treatment Status

    Baseline and 12 weeks.

Study Arms (3)

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a structured 12-week cognitive-behavioral group intervention designed to improve stress coping and reduce anxiety-depressive symptoms. The program includes psychoeducation, mindfulness, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, self-instruction training, and social skills development. Intervention: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Psychophysiological Regulation Therapy (PRT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a structured 12-week group intervention emphasizing psychophysiological self-regulation. The program includes psychoeducation, mindfulness, relaxation, breathing control, and biofeedback-based exercises aimed at reducing emotional distress and enhancing self-regulation.

Behavioral: Psychophysiological Regulation Therapy (PRT)

Standard Care (SC)

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the control group remain on a waiting list and receive standard medical care provided by the Multiple Sclerosis Unit during the study period. After study completion, they are offered participation in one of the active interventions.

Interventions

A structured 12-week group-based cognitive-behavioral intervention including psychoeducation, mindfulness training, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, self-instruction training, and social skills development. Designed to improve coping, reduce anxiety-depressive symptoms, and enhance cognitive and emotional functioning.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

A structured 12-week group-based intervention emphasizing psychophysiological self-regulation through psychoeducation, mindfulness, relaxation, breathing control, and biofeedback-based exercises to reduce emotional distress and promote physiological balance.

Psychophysiological Regulation Therapy (PRT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis according to standard clinical criteria.
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 3.5.
  • Mild to moderate cognitive impairment defined as: up to two BRB-N subtests with scores \< -2 SD.
  • Presence of anxiety or depressive symptoms defined as:
  • HADS: score \> 8 on one or both subscales, and/or
  • BDI-II: score \> 8.
  • Stable disease-modifying treatment for ≥ 3 months.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (SPMS or PPMS).
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing participation in psychological sessions.
  • Active psychiatric or neurological disorders unrelated to MS.
  • Participation in another psychological or pharmacological intervention study.
  • Recent initiation or modification of disease-modifying treatment (\< 3 months).
  • Substance abuse or dependence within the past year.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Psychology, University of La Laguna Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences Campus de Guajara, Calle Heraclio Sánchez, s/n 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife Spain

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38200, Spain

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Scandiffio J, Langer LK, Senthilnathan V, Feng G, Sureshkumar A, Bromberg M, Babineau J, Donkers SJ, Knox KB, Bruno T, Walker LAS, Bayley MT, Simpson R. Effects of psychological therapies in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;272(9):584. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13315-6.

    PMID: 40833620BACKGROUND
  • Lucien A, Francis H, Wu W, Woldhuis T, Gandy M. The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Nov;91:105858. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105858. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

    PMID: 39276596BACKGROUND
  • Moss-Morris R, McCrone P, Yardley L, van Kessel K, Wills G, Dennison L. A pilot randomised controlled trial of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Jun;50(6):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

    PMID: 22516321BACKGROUND
  • De Meo E, Portaccio E, Bonacchi R, Giovannoli J, Niccolai C, Amato MP. An update on the treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2025 Feb;25(2):227-243. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2450788. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

    PMID: 39801437BACKGROUND
  • Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Weitz E, Andersson G, Hollon SD, van Straten A. The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014 Apr;159:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

    PMID: 24679399BACKGROUND
  • Amato MP, Langdon D, Montalban X, Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Krupp LB, Thompson AJ, Comi G. Treatment of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: position paper. J Neurol. 2013 Jun;260(6):1452-68. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6678-0. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

    PMID: 23180174BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAnxiety DisordersDepressionCognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisFatigue

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors were blinded to participants' group allocation. Participants and therapists were aware of the assigned intervention, but evaluators conducting clinical and neuropsychological assessments did not have access to treatment information to minimize bias in data collection.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study employed a three-arm randomized controlled design with participants allocated to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Psychophysiological Regulation Therapy (PRT), or Standard Care (waiting list). Interventions were group-based over 12 weekly sessions, with assessments at baseline and post-intervention. Both CBT and PRT followed structured programs aimed at improving stress coping and reducing anxiety-depressive symptoms through psychoeducation, mindfulness, and psychophysiological regulation. Sessions combined didactic content, group exercises, and homework. CBT emphasized behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, self-instruction, and social skills training, whereas PRT focused on psychophysiological self-regulation, relaxation, breathing control, and biofeedback exercises.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator and Researcher, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria (HUNSC); Professor of Psychology, University of La Laguna

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Posted

December 9, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

January 1, 2019

Study Completion

January 1, 2019

Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, Dr. Moisés Bermúdez Hernández (mbermudh@ull.edu.es), for academic and non-commercial research purposes. Data will be fully anonymized in compliance with institutional and ethical regulations and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
IPD and supporting documents will be available beginning 12 months after publication of the main results and will remain accessible for 5 years thereafter.
Access Criteria
Qualified researchers affiliated with academic or non-profit institutions may request access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents (protocol, SAP, ICF, CSR) for scientific and non-commercial purposes. Requests must be submitted to the corresponding author, Dr. Moisés Bermúdez Hernández (mbermudh@ull.edu.es). Access will be granted following review and approval by the study's ethics committee and in compliance with GDPR and institutional data-sharing policies.

Locations