NCT07251816

Brief Summary

Effort-based decisions are essential in daily life but strongly impaired in apathy across various brain disorders. Now, significant research to unveil the neural causes of apathy is needed. A crucial corollary to this is the need to identify the brain network and neural mechanisms underlying effort-based decisions. A fronto-striatal network and the noradrenergic system are involved in effort-based decision-making and apathy. Further, motor cortical structures may play a role in effort-based decision-making. However, the role of circuits connecting the fronto-striatal network and the noradrenergic system to the motor structures has been disregarded so far. Non-invasive brain stimulation methods provide a unique and safe means to test the causal role of connectivity changes between fronto-subcortical and motor structures in effort-based decision-making. It's now necessary to have an integrative, connectionnist framework to uncover the causal role of connectivity changes between fronto-subcortical and motor structures in effort-based decision-making. The overarching goal of the present research protocol is to establish an integrative framework testing the causal role of connectivity within recurrent, bidirectional circuits between fronto-subcortical circuits and motor structures in effort-based decision-making. To achieve this overarching goal, investigators will quantifiy the causal role of effective connectivity and oscillatory synchrony in these circuits on effort-related behavior using a non-invasive brain stimulation strategy. Further, a secondary aim is to identify potential non-invasive brain stimulation methods that could increase engagement in effortful behavior, paving the way for translational clinical applications in the context of apathy. The investigators hypothesize that effort-based decision-making in healthy subjects is governed by bidirectional interactions between fronto-subcortical circuits and motor structures such as the primary motor cortex, mediated by oscillatory synchrony in specific frequency bands (e.g., theta and gamma bands). Accordingly, they hypothesize that transient, non-invasive modulation of connectivity and oscillatory synchrony between these structures in healthy human subjects will directly modulate their decision to engage in effort. Specifically, five experiments will use complementary approaches to test the hypothesis.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
204

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Timeline
81mo left

Started Jan 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress4%
Jan 2026Jan 2033

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 14, 2026

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2033

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2033

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

September 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Healthy volunteersMotivationApathyDecision-makingEffort processing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Acceptance rates (from 0 to 100 % of acceptance) for behavioral outcomes. Connectivity and oscillatory changes for neural activity

    Acceptance rate is the participant's willingness to engage in effortful tasks for rewards and reaction times measure the rapidity to approach or avoid the effort. Connectivity and oscillatory changes will be analyses with imaging data

    Up to 6 months

  • Reaction times (in ms) for behavioral outcomes. Connectivity and oscillatory changes for neural activity

    Acceptance rate is the participant's willingness to engage in effortful tasks for rewards and reaction times measure the rapidity to approach or avoid the effort. Connectivity and oscillatory changes will be analyses with imaging data

    Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • fMRI connectivity

    Up to 6 months

  • EEG-measured synchrony

    Up to 6 months

Study Arms (7)

Experiment 1

EXPERIMENTAL

First, participant will undergo a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Then, participant will come to the scanner for 3 sessions. In each of the three sessions, participant will first perform the effort-based decision-making task in the functional (f)MRI scanner to establish baseline measures of decision behavior and connectivity. Following this, cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation will be applied using one of three conditions: 1. the supplementary motor area will be stimulated first, followed by the motor cortex. 2. the motor cortex will be stimulated first, followed by the supplementary motor area. 3. control stimulation, where the supplementary motor area will be stimulated first, followed by the motor cortex with a minimal 1 ms delay, which will not modulate effective connectivity. After stimulation, participant will again perform the effort-based decision-making task in the fMRI scanner.

Procedure: Cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation (ccPAS)Procedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scales

Experiment 2

EXPERIMENTAL

First, participant will undergo a structural MRI scan. Then, participant will come for three sessions. In each session, participants will begin by performing the effort-based decision-making task while their baseline behavioral and neural activity is recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Following this initial task, bifocal transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be applied under one of three conditions: 1. real, in-phase stimulation to synchronize oscillations between the supplementary motor area and motor cortex; 2. real, in-phase stimulation to synchronize oscillations between the orbitofrontal cortex and motor cortex; 3. control stimulation, where oscillations between the supplementary motor area and the motor cortex are applied in antiphase. Participant will perform the decision-making task during the stimulation. After the stimulation, participant will repeat the decision-making task with EEG recording.

Procedure: Bifocal transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Procedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scalesProcedure: EEG

Experiment 3

EXPERIMENTAL

First, participant will undergo a structural MRI scan. Then, participants will come to the lab to record electroencephalography (EEG) for three sessions. In each session, participant will begin by performing the effort-based decision-making task with EEG recording. Following this initial task, combined oscillatory magnetic stimulation and temporal interference stimulation will be applied under one of three conditions: 1. real oscillatory magnetic stimulation combined with real temporal interference stimulation; 2. control oscillatory magnetic stimulation (using a control coil, making the same noise as a real stimulation) combined with real temporal interference stimulation; 3. both control oscillatory magnetic stimulation and a control temporal interference stimulation as a control condition. Participant will perform the decision-making task during stimulation. After the stimulation, participant will repeat the decision-making task with EEG recording.

Procedure: Combining transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) and oscillatory TMSProcedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scalesProcedure: EEG

Experiment 4

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant will come to the MRI facilities for three sessions. In each session, participants will begin by performing the effort-based decision-making task while their baseline behavioral and neural activity is recorded using fMRI. Following this initial task, transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied under one of three conditions: 1. real anodal stimulation, 2. real cathodal stimulation, 3. control stimulation. Participant will perform the decision-making task during stimulation. Further, stimulation will be realized in the scanner using an MRI-compatible set-up, to directly measured the changes in neural activity induced by the stimulation. After the stimulation, participants will repeat the decision-making task with fMRI recording.

Procedure: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Procedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scales

Experiment 5

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant will come to the MRI facilities for one experimental session. In this single session, participant will first perform the task while transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation will be applied under one of two conditions in separate blocks of trials: 1. real stimulation, aimed at modulating the activity of the locus coeruleus and influencing the noradrenergic system; 2. control stimulation, which serves as a control to account for non-specific effects of the procedure. During the stimulation, participant will continue performing the decision-making task.

Procedure: Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS)Procedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scales

Preparatory experiment 1

EXPERIMENTAL

First, each participant will undergo a structural magnetic resonance imaging session at the CERMEP. The acquired data will be used for neuro-navigation, ensuring precise targeting of brain regions during the paired-pulse stimulation procedure. Then, participants will perform the effort-based decision-making task while paired-pulse stimulation is applied during the decision-making period. The stimulation will target circuits connecting the supplementary motor area and the motor cortex. Test pulses will be delivered to the motor cortex, either alone or preceded by a conditioning pulse to the supplementary motor area. These conditioned and unconditioned stimulations will occur at random intervals during the decision-making phase of the task. Motor-evoked potentials will be recorded with surface electromyography throughout the decision-making period.

Procedure: Cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation (ccPAS)Procedure: MRIProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scales

Preparatory experiment 2

EXPERIMENTAL

First, participants will perform the effort-based decision-making task while MEG is used to record neural oscillatory activity (one session). This recording will take place at the MEG facility of the CERMEP, ensuring high temporal and spatial precision in capturing brain dynamics during task performance. Then, each of the participants will undergo a structural MRI scan that will be used to improve source localization during MEG data processing.

Procedure: MRIProcedure: MEGProcedure: PupillometryBehavioral: Neuropsychological scales

Interventions

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Experiment 1Preparatory experiment 1

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Experiment 2

Transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation

Experiment 3

Transcranial electrical stimulation

Experiment 4

Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS)

Experiment 5
MRIPROCEDURE

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Experiment 1Experiment 2Experiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 5Preparatory experiment 1Preparatory experiment 2
MEGPROCEDURE

Magnetoencephalography

Preparatory experiment 2
PupillometryPROCEDURE

Measurement and analysis of changes in pupil diameter over time, providing a non-invasive and straightforward method to investigate physiological and psychological processes. Using an eye tracker or pupillometer equipped with infrared cameras, pupil size is measured with high precision and temporal resolution. Pupil responses serve as a proxy for effort invigoration and are linked to multiple neuromodulatory systems, including the noradrenergic system. Recordings will be conducted throughout both experiments, with participants instructed to minimize movements and blinking to ensure data quality.

Experiment 1Experiment 2Experiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 5Preparatory experiment 1Preparatory experiment 2

Different neuropsychological scales will be administered to assess various psychological and behavioral dimensions relevant to the study, such as: the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES): To evaluate levels of apathy ; the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS): To assess depression, anxiety, and stress ; and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS): To evaluate the inability to experience pleasure.

Experiment 1Experiment 2Experiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 5Preparatory experiment 1Preparatory experiment 2
EEGPROCEDURE

Electroencephalography

Experiment 2Experiment 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 40 years
  • Participants without confounding factors such as neural alterations related to neurological pathology, whether neurodegenerative (e.g., Alzheimer, Parkinson, Huntington, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), motor (e.g., dystonia, essential tremors, cerebellar syndrome), traumatic (e.g., traumatic brain injury, medulla lesion) or psychiatric pathologies, whether mood disorders (e.g., depression, bipolarity), anxious troubles (e.g., obsessional compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder), psychotic (e.g., schizophrenia, delusion), substance-related (e.g., alcool, drug or medicine addiction), food-related (e.g., anorexia, bulimia), neurodevelopmental (e.g., autism, attention-deficit with hyperactivity disorder) or personality (e.g., borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder).
  • Participants affiliated with a compulsory social security scheme.

You may not qualify if:

  • Persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decisions.
  • Pregnant women, women in labor or breastfeeding women
  • Persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research.
  • Adults under legal protection measures (e.g., guardianship or curatorship).
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders.
  • Use of tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, clomipramine, imipramine, nortriptyline), neuroleptics (chlorpromazine, haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine), or recreational drugs within the past 48 hours.
  • Regular use of recreational drugs.
  • Sleep deprivation (\< 5 hours regularly over the last 3 months)
  • Left-handedness or ambidexterity.
  • Physical injuries impacting motor tasks.
  • Presence of metal implants in the head (excluding oral fillings).
  • Presence of implanted medical devices (e.g., pacemaker).
  • Presence of metallic injuries in the eyes.
  • Claustrophobia.
  • Piercings incompatible with MRI procedures.
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Equipe ImpAct CRNL, INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR 5292

Bron, 69500, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lethargy

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Gerard DEROSIERE, Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Experiments 1 to 5 require randomization of the stimulation conditions within each participant, either across sessions (in experiments 1, 2, 3, and 4) or across blocks of trials (in experiment 5). Only the principal investigator have the list of randomization.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2025

First Posted

November 26, 2025

Study Start

January 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2033

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations