PAN-ICIS Study: ICIS for Early Detection of Infectious Complications in Pancreatic Surgery
PAN-ICIS
PAN-ICIS: Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Intensive Care Infection Score for Early Detection of Infectious Complications After Pancreatic Resections
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines a new blood test called ICIS, which may help detect infections earlier after pancreatic surgery. Patients will have routine blood samples taken during their hospital stay, with no extra procedures required. By tracking how ICIS changes over time, investigators aim to improve early infection detection, support safer recovery, and reduce postoperative complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2025
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2028
December 1, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.2 years
November 18, 2025
November 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of ICIS for detecting postoperative infectious complications, measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios at prespecified cut-offs (e.g., ≥3, ≥4, ≥5).
From day one after surgery to the end of hospitalization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome
From day one after surgery to the end of the hospitalization
Other Outcomes (1)
Exploratory outcomes
From day one after surgery to the end of the 90 day follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Patients following pancreatic surgery
All patients following pancreatic surgery will be enrolled in this study
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing pancreatic surgery
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥ 18-years-old
- Indication for an elective pancreatic procedure
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years old.
- Known hematologic malignancy or hematological pathology.
- Refusal to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Surgery 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague
Prague, Prague 6, 16902, Czechia
Related Publications (37)
Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PMID: 24055383BACKGROUNDCosgrove SE. The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 15;42 Suppl 2:S82-9. doi: 10.1086/499406.
PMID: 16355321BACKGROUNDde Kraker ME, Wolkewitz M, Davey PG, Koller W, Berger J, Nagler J, Icket C, Kalenic S, Horvatic J, Seifert H, Kaasch A, Paniara O, Argyropoulou A, Bompola M, Smyth E, Skally M, Raglio A, Dumpis U, Melbarde Kelmere A, Borg M, Xuereb D, Ghita MC, Noble M, Kolman J, Grabljevec S, Turner D, Lansbury L, Grundmann H. Burden of antimicrobial resistance in European hospitals: excess mortality and length of hospital stay associated with bloodstream infections due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):398-407. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq412. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
PMID: 21106563BACKGROUNDPierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15. doi: 10.1186/cc8872. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
PMID: 20144219BACKGROUNDLimongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D, Thiallinagram A, Tait P, Jackson J, Habib NA, Williamson RC, Jiao LR. Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.04.022.
PMID: 17723881BACKGROUNDNakamura K, Sho M, Kinoshita S, Akahori T, Nagai M, Nakagawa K, Takagi T, Ikeda N. New insight into the association between bile infection and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Dec;27(12):992-1001. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.781. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
PMID: 32506812BACKGROUNDOhgi K, Sugiura T, Yamamoto Y, Okamura Y, Ito T, Uesaka K. Bacterobilia may trigger the development and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 May 24.
PMID: 27233637BACKGROUNDLoos M, Strobel O, Legominski M, Dietrich M, Hinz U, Brenner T, Heininger A, Weigand MA, Buchler MW, Hackert T. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: Microbial growth determines outcome. Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1185-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
PMID: 30217397BACKGROUNDDroogh DHM, Groen JV, de Boer MGJ, van Prehn J, Putter H, Bonsing BA, van Eijck CHJ, Vahrmeijer AL, van Santvoort HC, Groot Koerkamp B, Mieog JSD. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1458-1466. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad213.
PMID: 37440361BACKGROUNDNahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 15;11:105-118. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29588609BACKGROUNDSaito R, Kawaida H, Amemiya H, Nakata Y, Izumo W, Furuya M, Maruyama S, Takiguchi K, Shoda K, Ashizawa N, Nakayama Y, Shiraishi K, Furuya S, Akaike H, Kawaguchi Y, Ichikawa D. Clinical significance of postoperative complications after pancreatic surgery in time-to-complication and length of postoperative hospital stay: a retrospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 5;409(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03369-x.
PMID: 38836878BACKGROUNDSankar V, Webster NR. Clinical application of sepsis biomarkers. J Anesth. 2013 Apr;27(2):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1502-7. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
PMID: 23108494BACKGROUNDAloisio E, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Procalcitonin: Between evidence and critical issues. Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Sep;496:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
PMID: 31194966BACKGROUNDLeboueny M, Maloupazoa Siawaya AC, Bouanga LDJ, Mvoundza Ndjindji O, Mveang Nzoghe A, Djoba Siawaya JF. Changes of C-reactive protein and Procalcitonin after four weeks of treatment in patients with pulmonary TB. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2023 Jan 18;31:100348. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100348. eCollection 2023 May.
PMID: 36714271BACKGROUNDYu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):322-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9008. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
PMID: 23203918BACKGROUNDRiley LK, Rupert J. Evaluation of Patients with Leukocytosis. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Dec 1;92(11):1004-11.
PMID: 26760415BACKGROUNDSinger M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
PMID: 26903338BACKGROUNDEvans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 34599691BACKGROUNDMarchegiani G, Barreto SG, Bannone E, Sarr M, Vollmer CM, Connor S, Falconi M, Besselink MG, Salvia R, Wolfgang CL, Zyromski NJ, Yeo CJ, Adham M, Siriwardena AK, Takaori K, Hilal MA, Loos M, Probst P, Hackert T, Strobel O, Busch ORC, Lillemoe KD, Miao Y, Halloran CM, Werner J, Friess H, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M, Vashist YK, Conlon K, Passas I, Gianotti L, Del Chiaro M, Schulick RD, Montorsi M, Olah A, Fusai GK, Serrablo A, Zerbi A, Fingerhut A, Andersson R, Padbury R, Dervenis C, Neoptolemos JP, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Shrikhande SV; International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP): Definition and Grading From the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):663-672. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005226.
PMID: 34596077BACKGROUNDQuero G, Massimiani G, Lucinato C, Fiorillo C, Menghi R, Laterza V, Schena CA, De Sio D, Rosa F, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Tondolo V, Alfieri S. Acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: clinical outcomes and predictive factors analysis according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. HPB (Oxford). 2023 Mar;25(3):363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
PMID: 36764909BACKGROUNDHo CK, Kleeff J, Friess H, Buchler MW. Complications of pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(2):99-108. doi: 10.1080/13651820510028936.
PMID: 18333171BACKGROUNDAoki S, Miyata H, Konno H, Gotoh M, Motoi F, Kumamaru H, Wakabayashi G, Kakeji Y, Mori M, Seto Y, Unno M. Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 May;24(5):243-251. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.438. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
PMID: 28196308BACKGROUNDGouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):786-95. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007.
PMID: 11088073BACKGROUNDPovoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF. Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):131-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00001.
PMID: 10450725BACKGROUNDKent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. The burden of infection for elective pancreatic resections. Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.026. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22698935BACKGROUNDOkano K, Hirao T, Unno M, Fujii T, Yoshitomi H, Suzuki S, Satoi S, Takahashi S, Kainuma O, Suzuki Y. Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1551-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9919. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
PMID: 26387569BACKGROUNDSourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G, Bert F, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Paugam-Burtz C, Sauvanet A. Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jun;15(6):473-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
PMID: 23458261BACKGROUNDSmajic J, Tupkovic LR, Husic S, Avdagic SS, Hodzic S, Imamovic S. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Surgical Patients. Med Arch. 2018 Apr;72(2):116-119. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.116-119.
PMID: 29736100BACKGROUNDMargraf A, Ludwig N, Zarbock A, Rossaint J. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Surgery: Mechanisms and Protection. Anesth Analg. 2020 Dec;131(6):1693-1707. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005175.
PMID: 33186158BACKGROUNDBaddam S, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. 2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547669/
PMID: 31613449BACKGROUNDD'Angelica MI, Ellis RJ, Liu JB, Brajcich BC, Gonen M, Thompson VM, Cohen ME, Seo SK, Zabor EC, Babicky ML, Bentrem DJ, Behrman SW, Bertens KA, Celinski SA, Chan CHF, Dillhoff M, Dixon MEB, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Gholami S, House MG, Karanicolas PJ, Lavu H, Maithel SK, McAuliffe JC, Ott MJ, Reames BN, Sanford DE, Sarpel U, Scaife CL, Serrano PE, Smith T, Snyder RA, Talamonti MS, Weber SM, Yopp AC, Pitt HA, Ko CY. Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 May 9;329(18):1579-1588. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5728.
PMID: 37078771BACKGROUNDVrbacky F, Fatorova I, Blazek M, Smahel P, Zak P. Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is elevated in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 in the early stages of disease. J Infect Public Health. 2022 May;15(5):533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
PMID: 35461075BACKGROUNDKaeslin, Martha, Brunner, Saskia, Raths, Janine and Huber, Andreas. "Improvement in detecting bacterial infection in lower respiratory tract infections using the Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS)" LaboratoriumsMedizin, vol. 40, no. 3, 2016, pp. 175-182.
BACKGROUNDNierhaus A, Linssen J, Wichmann D, Braune S, Kluge S. Use of a weighted, automated analysis of the differential blood count to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation: the intensive care infection score (ICIS). Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012 Apr;11(2):109-15. doi: 10.2174/187152812800392841.
PMID: 22280231BACKGROUNDWeimann K, Zimmermann M, Spies CD, Wernecke KD, Vicherek O, Nachtigall I, Tafelski S, Weimann A. Intensive Care Infection Score--A new approach to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious processes in intensive care and medicosurgical patients. J Int Med Res. 2015 Jun;43(3):435-51. doi: 10.1177/0300060514557711. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 25850686BACKGROUNDvan der Geest PJ, Mohseni M, Linssen J, Duran S, de Jonge R, Groeneveld AB. The intensive care infection score - a novel marker for the prediction of infection and its severity. Crit Care. 2016 Jul 7;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1366-6.
PMID: 27384242BACKGROUNDDeniz E, Klatte S, Tekin-Bubenheim N, Zimmermann M. Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jun 5;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3.
PMID: 40471473BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2028
Last Updated
December 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share