Anatomical Determinants and Outcomes of Small Annulus Patients Undergoing TAVR in Different ASIAN Ethnicity
1 other identifier
observational
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) presents unique challenges for Asian patients compared to Caucasians, largely due to the prevalence of small aortic annulus (SAA) defined based on Caucasians' data (430 mm²), bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and substantial calcium deposits. No universally accepted cutoff value for defining SAA exists among Asian patients, who tend to have smaller body-built, resulting in inconsistencies across various studies. For the new-generation 20-/23-mm balloon expandable valve, a SAA is categorized as \<330 mm². Additionally, Asian Japanese patients have been identified to have extremely SAA (\<314 mm²), associated with unexpectedly larger residual transvalvular gradients following TAVI. Previous research on patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) impact within the Asian population has also shown inconsistency. The OCEAN-TAVI registry with 1,546 Japanese patients found no significant differences in one-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between PPM and non-PPM groups. A study on the Sapien 3 balloon expandable valve in patients with SAA (\<430 mm²) found comparable clinical outcomes to non-SAA patients up to five years post-procedure, consistent with findings from a South Korean study. However, a Taiwan study involving 201 patients with PPM indicated higher rates of adverse outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Moreover, TAVI with self-expanding valves (SEV) has shown improved hemodynamic outcomes and reduced PPM incidence compared to balloon expandable valves (BEV) in patients with extreme SAA. To date, research on inter-racial differences in TAVI among Asian populations is lacking. This multicenter registry aims to evaluate SEV versus BEV outcomes in diverse Asian patients, particularly those with extreme SAA, and to address ethnic-specific challenges in TAVI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2028
November 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.6 years
November 16, 2025
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction (SVD) at 12 months
12 months Post-Operation
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Mortality rate
Mortality of patients 12 months post-operation
Disabling stroke rate
Rate of disabling stroke 12 months post-operation
Heart failure re-hospitalization rate
Heart failure re-hospitalization rate at 12 month post-operation
Rate of moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM)
Rate of moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) at 12 month post-operation
Rate of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM)
Rate of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) at 12 month post-operation
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (7)
AS TAVI patient in Prince of Wales Hospital
AS TAVI patient in Sarawak Heart Centre/University Malaysia Sarawak
AS TAVI patient in National Heart Centre Malaysia
AS TAVI patient in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
AS TAVI patient in Ramathibodi Hospital
AS TAVI patient in St. Luke's Medical Cente
AS TAVI patient in Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic
Eligibility Criteria
Retrospective data collection will be carried out at multiple TAVI sites in Asia. Patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI (SEV/ BEV) will be identified from retrospective records (Physical/ Electronic). Consecutive patients who underwent pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) scans for aortic valve evaluation from 2018-1-1 to 2024-12-31 were included.
You may qualify if:
- Aortic Stenosis patients treated with Transcatherter Aortic Valve Intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Transcatherter Aortic Valve Intervention for pure Aortic Regurgitation
- Emergent procedure for any reason;
- Previous aortic valve replacement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Konglead
- Sarawak Heart Centrecollaborator
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospitalcollaborator
- Ramathibodi Hospitalcollaborator
- University Malaysia Sarawakcollaborator
- St. Luke's Medical Center, Philippinescollaborator
- Sapporo Heart Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Shatin, 0000, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chak Yu Kent So, Clinicnal Assistant Professor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2025
First Posted
November 20, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11