Conscious Sedation With Suprainguinal Facia Iliaca Block Versus Ilioinguinal Iliohypogastric Block for TAVI
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the aim of the present study is to compare suprainguinal fascia iliaca block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric (II-IH) nerve block in improving the quality of conscious sedation, including reducing patients' requirements for analgesia also better satisfaction for both patient and surgeon as regards patient outcome and decreasing the incidence of conversion to general anesthesia during TAVI procedure
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedApril 4, 2025
March 1, 2025
5 months
March 22, 2025
April 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome is the timing to the first rescue analgesia
sedation score (RASS), and pain (numerical rating scale \[NSR\] from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[unbearable pain\]) at 0 time start of sedation and every 30 min till the end of the procedure then 1, 3, and 6 h after TAVI. While, Pain intensity was assessed using numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10; 0 = no pain; 10 = the worth pains imaginable) in five time-points intraoperatively (femoral artery cannulation (1), aortic valve system introduction (2), aortic valve system removal (3), vessel closure devices insertion (4), the end of the operation (5)). In addition, the need for post TAVI pacing, vascular complications at the TAVI access site during admission, and the length of hospital stay were recorded. Rescue analgesia will be given When NRS was more than 4, patient discomfort or doctor dis-satisfaction is detected, 0.5 mic /kg fentanyl will be given. The primary outcome is the timing to the first rescue analgesia
Six months
Study Arms (3)
Group I (F)
ACTIVE COMPARATORsuprainguinal fascia iliaca block group (SIFIB)
Group II (I)
ACTIVE COMPARATORiliohypogastric and ilioinguinal group (IL-IH)
Group III (C)
OTHERcontrol group patients received infiltration of 0.5% 10ml bupivacaine and 1% 10 ml lidocaine in the groin at the site of puncture
Interventions
The anterior superior iliac spine is identified by a high-frequency linear probe (SonoSite HFL50x, 15-6 MHz, 55-mm broadband linear array, USA) the inguinal ligament in the parasagittal plane, following appropriate disinfection and draping of the patient in the supine position. Then, the probe is moved medially, and the internal oblique muscle in the cranial direction, the sartorius muscle in the caudal direction, the bow-tie shape formed by these muscles, the underlying iliacus muscle, and the fascia iliaca surrounding it is visualized. (21) An 80-mm peripheral nerve block needle is inserted from the caudal side, and the iliac fascia is passed. After identification of the correct area following 2 to 3 mL of hydro-dissection, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected.
Group II (I): iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal group (IL-IH) After preparation of the inguinal region sterile linear high frequency probe (SonoSite HFL50x, 15-6 MHz, 55-mm broadband linear array, USA) is placed between the iliac crest and costal margin (more cephalad than the usual location for ilioinguinal block). In this location, the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in between the transverses abdominus and internal oblique are well defined (22) After visualization, a 22G 1.5-inch needle is used in out of-plane approach to reach the nerves. After identification of the correct area following 2 to 3 mL of hydro-dissection, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected (kayak sign).
patients receive infiltration of 0.5% 10ml bupivacaine and 1% 10 ml lidocaine in the groin at the site of puncture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged \>20 years with severe aortic stenosis undergoing elective, non-emergent, non-urgent transfemoral Sapien 3TM (Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) or CoreValveTM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) implantation were included in the study
You may not qualify if:
- younger than 20 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams university
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia, ICU and pain management
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2025
First Posted
April 4, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
August 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share