Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
Effect of Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites; A Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
When a tooth is removed, the bone around it (called the alveolar ridge) naturally shrinks. This study compares two bone grafting materials to find out which one better preserves bone after molar extraction: Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM): A material made from the patient's own extracted tooth, treated to remove minerals while keeping bone-forming proteins. Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM): A mixture of a standard bone substitute and platelet-rich plasma from the patient's blood.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
November 20, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
November 16, 2025
November 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Alveolar Ridge Width
Measurement of horizontal bone width at the extraction site using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Baseline (immediately postoperative) and 4 months postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Alveolar Ridge Height
Baseline (immediately postoperative) and 4 months postoperatively.
Change in Bone Density
Baseline (immediately postoperative) and 4 months postoperatively.
Postoperative Pain
2 days, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively.
Study Arms (2)
Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) + Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive socket grafting using Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) prepared from their own extracted tooth. The dentin is cleaned, ground into particles, demineralized using 0.6 N hydrochloric acid, rinsed with saline, and mixed with autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) before being placed into the extraction socket. The socket is then closed with resorbable sutures for healing.
Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive socket grafting using a Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM) composed of a commercially available xenograft mixed with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). The mixture forms a cohesive mineralized matrix that is placed into the extraction socket and stabilized with sutures.
Interventions
Autogenous dentin-derived grafting material is used as a bone substitute for alveolar ridge preservation following molar extraction. PRF, obtained from the patient's centrifuged blood, is mixed with DDM to enhance graft stability and promote healing.
A xenogenic bone substitute is mixed with autologous platelet-rich plasma to form a mineralized plasmatic matrix, which serves as a control graft for ridge preservation after molar extraction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Non-restorable tooth indicated for extraction Multi-rooted teeth Age group of 18 to 55 years Patients free from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Pregnant females Active infection at extraction site Smokers Systemic conditions affecting healing (e.g. diabetes, medications as bisphosphonates...) Poor oral hygiene. Patient with systemic disease that may affect bone healing. o Uncooperative patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Cairo, 12613, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tarek Ibrahim ElGhareeb, Phd
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Salah Eldin ElAbbasy, Phd
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Suliman Ahmed, Bds
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blind design - participants will not be informed which grafting material (DDM or MPM) was used in their treatment. The operating surgeons and data analysts will be aware of the allocation due to the nature of the procedures.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2025
First Posted
November 20, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11