Virtual Reality Based Robotic Gait and Balance Trainer
A Comparison of the Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Balance Training and Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Balance and Gait Performance in Individuals with Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of research is to examine and compare the effectiveness of virtual reality-based balance training and robot-assisted walking approaches on balance and gait in individuals post-stroke. Through the study, Investigators intend to reach conclusions regarding whether the focus should be on balance or walking training based on the Berg Balance Scale and Functional Ambulation Classification levels of stroke survivors. Subgroups will be formed in both groups based on Functional Ambulation and Berg Balance Scale scores. The balance and gait developments within these subgroups will be compared, aiming to determine at which levels balance or walking improvement is more pronounced. These findings are crucial for making the right choices in setting rehabilitation goals for individual patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Aug 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFebruary 20, 2025
December 1, 2023
1.4 years
November 30, 2023
February 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Berg Balance Scale
This is a simple and safe balance test designed to measure an individual's ability to maintain balance while performing functional tasks. The person is asked to perform 14 tasks, and scores are given based on the completion of each task. A score of 0 is assigned when the activity is not performed at all, while a score of 4 is given when the activity is completed independently. The highest possible score is 56, with 0-20 indicating balance impairment, 21-40 suggesting an acceptable balance, and 41-56 indicating good balance.
Baseline and After last treatment seasion
Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis
In our research, spatiotemporal gait analysis will be conducted using the CMill VR+ device. As a result of gait analysis, parameters such as step lengths, swing, stance and double support phases, cadence, and levels of weight shifting to each side during walking will be recorded.
Baseline and After last treatment seasion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional Independence Measure
Baseline and After last treatment seasion
Functional Ambulation Category
Baseline and After last treatment seasion
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction
After last treatment seasion
Study Arms (2)
Lokomat
EXPERIMENTALBalance Trainer
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Person-Specific Rehabilitation Program
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having the ICD-10 diagnosis code G.81 Hemiplegia
- At least 3 weeks having passed since the diagnosis (Subacute and cronic periods)
- Being 18 years of age or older
- Having a Berg Balance Score between 21-40 (indicating an acceptable balance)
- Being able to walk with or without support (FAC score of 2 or higher)
You may not qualify if:
- Having a known additional neurological or orthopedic problem that could affect balance
- Inability to adapt to virtual reality applications in Lokomat and Balance Trainer
- Diagnosis being more than 2 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara City Hospital
Ankara, Çankaya, 06000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2023
First Posted
December 11, 2023
Study Start
August 23, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
February 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-12