POSITIVE OUTCOMES: Improving Quality
POSITIVE OUTCOMES: Driving up the Quality of HIV Outpatient Care Through the Routine Implementation of a PROM to Promote Patient-centredness
1 other identifier
observational
17,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
People Living with HIV (PLWH) in the UK have a high burden of mental health, social and spiritual concerns, physical symptoms, and poorer health-related quality of life than the general population. PLWH feel that routine clinical appointments do not routinely address the things that matter to them, with implications for their engagement and outcomes of treatment and care. Contrastingly, good psychosocial care and communication with HIV professionals are associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, adherence and retention in care. Although HIV service structures, processes and outputs are routinely audited, it is person-centred patient-reported outcomes that define quality care. We have established a stakeholder project team, conducted community consultation and undertaken careful research-led development of a PROM for PLWH (called "POSITIVE OUTCOMES". This PROM has been developed in 2 European countries and validated in 5 European countries, using best scientific principles of psychometrics. We have established face and content validity, conducted cognitive interviews, and demonstrated validity and reliability in a sample of N=1,705 PLWH who completed at least 2 data points (manuscript in preparation). This was conducted alongside a national consultation to develop the new iteration of HIV care standards that includes a standard on "person-centred care" https://www.bhiva.org/file/KrfaFqLZRlBhg/BHIVA-Standards-of-Care-2018.pdf. To meet the requirements in delivering and auditing person-centred care within those standards, we need to answer the following questions:
- What are optimal methods for routine implementation of the PROM from the perspectives of stakeholders
- What are locally-relevant components of a Decision Support Tool to provide clinicians with appropriate evidence-based clinical responses to patient PROM scores
- What is an implementable Quality Improvement Programme to improve person-centred outcomes, informing (inter)national roll out with existing registry data? The aim of this proposal is to develop a five-site demonstration patient-centred quality improvement programme determining feasibility, optimal implementation methods and data usage, and to deliver a framework for (inter)national adoption. The objectives are:
- To develop a quality improvement team within each of our three demonstration sites and identify site-specific challenges and potential solutions (including IT) for PROM implementation.
- To develop an evidence-based Decision Support Tool (DST) specifying clinical responses to real-time PROM data from PLWH that are feasible within local resources, a PROM training programme for clinicians and a PLWH "mentor" for patients in each site
- Hold a quality improvement launch meeting to train on POSITIVE OUTCOMES and DST implementation.
- Implement the Positive Outcomes PROM in three demonstration sites
- Test impact on outcomes using annual quality improvement cycles at facility level Determine stakeholder (PLWH, clinician) views on the quality improvement mechanisms, impact and areas for further refinement.
- Develop and disseminate a national manual on implementation of the POSITIVE OUTCOMES quality improvement programme. The project is working with 5 clinics across the UK and the US:
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK)
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (London, UK)
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (Brighton, UK)
- HOWARD BROWN Health Clinic (Chicago, US)
- CAN SUPPORT Community Health Center (Miami, US) The observational model for the project is a quality improvement programme.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
November 14, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.7 years
September 24, 2025
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stakeholder views
Determine stakeholder views through longitudinal qualitative in-depth interviews with people living with HIV who have completed the POSITIVE OUTCOMES PROM. 4-6 weeks after each interview, the participant's case notes will be reviewed alongside the completed PROM to examine what documented actions have been made in response to symptoms and concerns raised using the PROM. Additionally, approximately 15 clinicians and staff from each UK site will be recruited to participate in focus groups 6 months before the end of the 2 year implementation period. Topic guides will address the PROM content, timing and method of completion, data sharing, use of data in clinical encounters, response of clinical team to the PROM data, perceived impact of using the PROM and the perceived mechanisms of action for any impact. We will also seek to elicit any suggested improvements for the programme and recommendations for the national roll-out manual.
6-24 months
Study Arms (1)
People Living with HIV
Interventions
POSITIVE OUTCOMES is a validated patient-reported outcome measure
Eligibility Criteria
People living with HIV who regularly attend one of the five study clinics.
You may qualify if:
- adult (aged at least 18 years) attending outpatient HIV care at one of the UK recruitment sites
- able to consent to participate in the study
- able to communicate in English or a language provided by NHS translation services
- purposively sampled by age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and time since HIV diagnosis
You may not qualify if:
- Aged under 18
- not attending care at one of the recruitment sites
- not able to consent to participate in the study
- speaks a language not available through NHS translation services
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Harding R, Clucas C, Lampe FC, Date HL, Fisher M, Johnson M, Edwards S, Anderson J, Sherr L. What factors are associated with patient self-reported health status among HIV outpatients? A multi-centre UK study of biomedical and psychosocial factors. AIDS Care. 2012;24(8):963-71. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.668175. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PMID: 22519889BACKGROUNDBristowe K, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Ni Cheallaigh C, Murtagh F, Anderson J, Sullivan AK, Harding R. Towards person-centred care for people living with HIV: what core outcomes matter, and how might we assess them? A cross-national multi-centre qualitative study with key stakeholders. HIV Med. 2019 Sep;20(8):542-554. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12758. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
PMID: 31162817BACKGROUNDBristowe K, Murtagh FEM, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Cheallaigh CN, Kall M, Anderson J, Sullivan AK, Harding R. The development and cognitive testing of the positive outcomes HIV PROM: a brief novel patient-reported outcome measure for adults living with HIV. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 6;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01462-5.
PMID: 32631444BACKGROUNDHarding R, Jones CI, Bremner S, Bristowe K, West B, Siegert RJ, O'Brien KK, Whetham J; EMERGE Consortium, Horizon 2020. Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person-centred outcome measure for people with HIV. HIV Med. 2022 Jul;23(6):673-683. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13224. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
PMID: 35014143BACKGROUND
Related Links
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2025
First Posted
November 14, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
November 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09