Methadone to Reduce Chronic Opioid Use After Major Spine Surgery: The MEND Pilot Feasibility Study
MEND
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a randomized, triple-blinded (patients, investigators, outcomes assessors), placebo-controlled pilot feasibility trial (Methadone to End Narcotic Dependence, MEND trial) to assess the feasibility and safety of postoperative oral methadone in patients undergoing spine surgery and collect preliminary data to inform a larger clinical trial that will test the opioid-sparing effects of methadone at 3 months after spine surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2025
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
December 17, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.9 years
October 21, 2025
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Feasibility and Acceptability-Participant Willingness/Recruitment
Willingness of participants to be randomized Indicates acceptability of randomization among eligible patients Outcome Measure: % of eligible patient consenting to randomization
7 days
Feasibility and Acceptability-Provider Engagement
Feasibility, acceptability and execution of clinical protocol based on the use of intraoperative IV methadone followed by a postoperative oral methadone regimen following spine surgery will be assessed by yes/no response to the following: Willingness of neurosurgeons/anesthesiologists to buy in to the trial Reflects institutional buy-in and clinical integration potential Outcome Measure: % of surgeons permitting patient enrollment and supporting protocol adherence
7 days
Feasibility and Execution-Protocol Compliance and Execution
Feasibility of clinical protocol based on the use of intraoperative IV methadone followed by a postoperative oral methadone regimen following spine surgery will be assessed by yes/no response to the following: Compliance with the protocol, including specific study related procedures and timepoints specific to medication administration, adverse event reporting and data collection. Demonstrates deliverability and data reliability Outcome Measure: % adherence to all major protocol steps (drug administration, ECGs, AE reporting, opioid data)
7 days
Acceptability and Execution-Baseline Stratification Data
Outcome Measure: % of enrolled patients with prior chronic opioid use
18 months
Feasibility and Execution-Follow-Up Completion
Ability to assess primary endpoint (opioid use at 3 months).Measured by response rates to the telephone survey at 3 months
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Execution-Collection of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities
18 months
Execution-Collection of Respiratory Adverse Events
18 months
Estimate Reduction in Opioid Use
90 days
Other Outcomes (1)
Development of and effective study design
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Methadone Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to receive post operative methadone
Patients randomized to receive (blinded) placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will receive post operative placebo
Interventions
Patients randomized to receive (blinded) placebo will receive placebo twice daily on day 1 and day 2 and once daily on day 3, 4 and 5. Patients taking preoperative opioids will return to baseline opioid schedule after surgery.
Patients randomized to receive (blinded) methadone: 5 mg twice daily on postoperative (post-op) days 1 and 2 followed by 5 mg daily on postop days 3, 4, and 5.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult ≥ 18 years of age
- Scheduled for multilevel lumbar and/or thoracic spine fusion (primary or revision)
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 or \>72 Years of age
- Body Mass Index \>40
- Known allergy to methadone
- Pregnant females
- Non-English-speaking patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (27)
Berardino K, Carroll AH, Kaneb A, Civilette MD, Sherman WF, Kaye AD. An Update on Postoperative Opioid Use and Alternative Pain Control Following Spine Surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Jun 22;13(2):24978. doi: 10.52965/001c.24978. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34745473BACKGROUNDBrummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe MJ, Bohnert ASB, Kheterpal S, Nallamothu BK. New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 21;152(6):e170504. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28403427BACKGROUNDDunn LK, Yerra S, Fang S, Hanak MF, Leibowitz MK, Alpert SB, Tsang S, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC, Naik BI. Safety profile of intraoperative methadone for analgesia after major spine surgery: An observational study of 1,478 patients. J Opioid Manag. 2018 Mar/Apr;14(2):83-87. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0435.
PMID: 29733094BACKGROUNDMartin BI, Turner JA, Mirza SK, Lee MJ, Comstock BA, Deyo RA. Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2077-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fad1.
PMID: 19675510BACKGROUNDLuby AO, Alessio-Bilowus D, Hu HM, Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Bicket MC. Trends in Opioid Prescribing and New Persistent Opioid Use After Surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):347-352. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006461. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
PMID: 39087325BACKGROUNDKharasch ED. Intraoperative methadone: rediscovery, reappraisal, and reinvigoration? Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):13-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fec9a3. No abstract available.
PMID: 21173206BACKGROUNDBanks ML, Roma PG, Folk JE, Rice KC, Negus SS. Effects of the delta-opioid agonist SNC80 on the abuse liability of methadone in rhesus monkeys: a behavioral economic analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Aug;216(3):431-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2235-2. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
PMID: 21369752BACKGROUNDDavidson EM, Coggeshall RE, Carlton SM. Peripheral NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors contribute to nociceptive behaviors in the rat formalin test. Neuroreport. 1997 Mar 3;8(4):941-6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199703030-00025.
PMID: 9141069BACKGROUNDStubhaug A, Breivik H. Long-term treatment of chronic neuropathic pain with the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonist ketamine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Mar;41(3):329-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04693.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 9113174BACKGROUNDSotgiu ML, Valente M, Storchi R, Caramenti G, Biella GE. Cooperative N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism and mu-opioid receptor agonism mediate the methadone inhibition of the spinal neuron pain-related hyperactivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Pharmacol Res. 2009 Oct;60(4):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
PMID: 19717013BACKGROUNDDavis AM, Inturrisi CE. d-Methadone blocks morphine tolerance and N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced hyperalgesia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 May;289(2):1048-53.
PMID: 10215686BACKGROUNDMao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ. Mechanisms of hyperalgesia and morphine tolerance: a current view of their possible interactions. Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):259-274. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00073-2.
PMID: 8657426BACKGROUNDAngst MS, Clark JD. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):570-87. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00025.
PMID: 16508405BACKGROUNDKreek MJ, Borg L, Ducat E, Ray B. Pharmacotherapy in the treatment of addiction: methadone. J Addict Dis. 2010 Apr;29(2):200-16. doi: 10.1080/10550881003684798.
PMID: 20407977BACKGROUNDKreutzwiser D, Tawfic QA. Methadone for Pain Management: A Pharmacotherapeutic Review. CNS Drugs. 2020 Aug;34(8):827-839. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00743-3.
PMID: 32564328BACKGROUNDGottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC. Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):218-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
PMID: 20418538BACKGROUNDFons RA, Hainsworth KR, Michlig J, Jablonski M, Czarnecki ML, Weisman SJ. Perioperative methadone for posterior spinal fusion in adolescents: Results from a double-blind randomized-controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 May;34(5):438-447. doi: 10.1111/pan.14843. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
PMID: 38288667BACKGROUNDMurphy GS, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur MA, Dickerson D, Bilimoria S, Benson J, Maher CE, Trenk GJ, Teister KJ, Szokol JW. Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements in the First Year after Intraoperative Methadone for Complex Spine and Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2020 Feb;132(2):330-342. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003025.
PMID: 31939849BACKGROUNDMachado FC, Vieira JE, de Orange FA, Ashmawi HA. Intraoperative Methadone Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption in Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1723-1732. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004404.
PMID: 31743194BACKGROUNDD'Souza RS, Gurrieri C, Johnson RL, Warner N, Wittwer E. Intraoperative methadone administration and postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2020 Feb;161(2):237-243. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001717.
PMID: 31613867BACKGROUNDEsfahani K, Tennant W, Tsang S, Naik BI, Dunn LK. Comparison of oral versus intravenous methadone on postoperative pain and opioid use after adult spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective, non-inferiority analysis. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 21;18(7):e0288988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288988. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37478144BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26978655BACKGROUNDMoore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):332-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x.
PMID: 22029804BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27965879BACKGROUNDBaron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
PMID: 3806354BACKGROUNDMascha EJ, Dalton JE, Kurz A, Saager L. Statistical grand rounds: understanding the mechanism: mediation analysis in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Anesth Analg. 2013 Oct;117(4):980-994. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a44cb9. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
PMID: 24023021BACKGROUNDAustin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.
PMID: 19757444BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shobana Rajan, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
- STUDY CHAIR
Andra Duncan, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomized 1:1 to postoperative methadone versus placebo on arrival to the operating room. Randomization will occur using a computer-generated randomization system in REDCap, with the sequence of randomly sized blocks pre-determined using the PLAN Procedure in SAS statistical software, stratified by previous history of opioid use (Opioid naïve versus those taking opioids before surgery).
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2025
First Posted
October 29, 2025
Study Start
November 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
December 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- De-identified data will be available post-analysis in abstract/journal articles.
The investigator plans to share information by presenting abstract/journal materials pending results.