NCT07221604

Brief Summary

The goal of this open pilot is to practice using an intervention and surveys before a larger pilot stepped wedge clinical trial. The intervention the researchers plan to use is Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics, and it is a structured clinical agenda-setting intervention (SAS), or a customized list of discussion topics. The people the researchers are practicing using the SAS with have advanced CKD (stages 4-5), and many of them live in rural areas. The researchers will practice administering CKD Topics, along with survey questions. By doing the open pilot, the researchers will learn if they need to modify the steps they plan to take in the larger trial. The main questions the researchers aim to answer are:

  • Do the steps for identifying eligible participants work?
  • Do the steps for administering CKD Topics work?
  • Do the steps to administer survey questions work?

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jul 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 28, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic kidney diseaseChronic kidney disease stage 4Chronic kidney disease stage 5Agenda-settingPatient engagementRuralParticipatory researchOpen pilot

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Feasibility Outcome: Intervention receipt

    Our primary outcome will be feasibility, assessed by the proportion of patients who received the intervention.

    Day 1

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Primary Process Outcome: Enrollment Rate

    Day 1

  • Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS)

    Day 1

  • Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient self-efficacy

    Day 1

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Arm 1 is Clinical Visit Agenda Setting Tool Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The study team will implement a structured clinical visit agenda-setting (SAS) intervention customized for advanced chronic kidney disease, called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics.

Behavioral: Chronic Kidney Disease Structured Agenda-Setting Tool

Interventions

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics is a novel clinical visit agenda-setting intervention developed through participatory research methods for people with CKD living in rural areas. CKD Topics includes 8 structured discussion topic areas with the option for patients to consider and indicate their priority topic areas and take notes before, during, and after a clinical visit.

Arm 1 is Clinical Visit Agenda Setting Tool Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults \>18 years old who have been diagnosed with advanced CKD (stages 4-5).
  • Care partners, clinicians and staff supporting these CKD patients who are willing and able to provide informed consent
  • English-speaking
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Patient must be attending outpatient visits \*(in-person and/or telehealth allowable).

You may not qualify if:

  • Children under 18 years old will not be included
  • Non-English-speaking patients and/or care partners
  • Patients on dialysis
  • Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Brashers DE, Haas SM, Neidig JL. The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 1999;11(2):97-121. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1.

    PMID: 16370972BACKGROUND
  • Clayman ML, Pandit AU, Bergeron AR, Cameron KA, Ross E, Wolf MS. Ask, understand, remember: a brief measure of patient communication self-efficacy within clinical encounters. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):72-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.500349.

    PMID: 20845194BACKGROUND
  • Frankel RM, Salyers MP, Bonfils KA, Oles SK, Matthias MS. Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: an exploratory study. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Sep;36(3):195-201. doi: 10.1037/prj0000004. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

    PMID: 23815174BACKGROUND
  • Gramling R, Stanek S, Ladwig S, Gajary-Coots E, Cimino J, Anderson W, Norton SA; AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group; Aslakson RA, Ast K, Elk R, Garner KK, Gramling R, Grudzen C, Kamal AH, Lamba S, LeBlanc TW, Rhodes RL, Roeland E, Schulman-Green D, Unroe KT. Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

    PMID: 26596879BACKGROUND
  • Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25662947BACKGROUND
  • Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

    PMID: 17574367BACKGROUND
  • Saunders CH, Durand MA, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Elwyn G. Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions, a new measure of serious illness experience, with an online simulation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 22.

    PMID: 35260261BACKGROUND
  • Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Bennett A, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. "It helps us say what's important..." Developing Serious Illness Topics: A clinical visit agenda-setting tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Aug;113:107764. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107764. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

    PMID: 37150152BACKGROUND
  • Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Jaggars A, Butt T, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. User-Centered Design of the consideRATE Questions, a Measure of People's Experiences When They Are Seriously Ill. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):555-565.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 16.

    PMID: 32814165BACKGROUND
  • Sierpe A, Yen RW, Stevens G, Van Citters AD, Elwyn G, Saunders CH. Agenda-setting in the clinical encounter: A systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312613. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 39446854BACKGROUND
  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
  • Wild MG, Wallston KA, Green JA, Beach LB, Umeukeje E, Wright Nunes JA, Ikizler TA, Steed J, Cavanaugh KL. The Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale can be applied to patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017 Oct;92(4):972-978. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 May 18.

    PMID: 28528132BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicPatient Participation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Catherine H. Saunders, Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Health Policy, PhD, MPH

CONTACT

Anne E. Dade, Research Associate, MPP

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Open feasibility pilot trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Scientist, Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Health Policy and Clinical Practice

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2025

First Posted

October 28, 2025

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The study will use standard processing and documentation protocols adopted by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) for data formats, dictionaries, variable names, descriptions, and labels. An XML schema using Data Documenting Initiative standards will also be used for codebooks and other metadata as appropriate. The researchers will share RCT process and outcomes data in CSV files via openICPSR, which is a self-publishing repository for social, behavioral and health science data and part of the ICPSR.

Locations