A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced CKD and Clinicians
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To achieve the goal of reaching consensus about the preferred treatment option that best aligns with the goals and values of patients, the investigators developed a 'CKD Jumpstart- Tips" priming tool tailored for older adults with advanced CKD that is based on communication principles from VitalTalk and Elwyn's goal-based SDM model. The investigators hypothesize that compared with patients in the usual care group, patients in the 'CKD Jumpstart- Tips' intervention group will have:
- 1.increased level of shared decision-making (observer-based and patient-reported),
- 2.improved quality of communication,
- 3.increased patient involvement in decision-making,
- 4.lower decisional conflict,
- 5.lower decision regret,
- 6.decreased time to decision,
- 7.improved adherence to treatment choice, and
- 8.improved health-related quality-of-life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
April 2, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.2 years
January 27, 2025
March 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Observer-rated shared decision making
Observer-rated shared decision making will be measured using the validated 5-item OPTION5 instrument based on Collaborative Deliberation. Each item is scored on a 0 (no effort) to 4 (exemplary effort) scale. Two raters will complete an online training module from the OPTION5 developers and then undergo calibration training through assessing five audio-recordings of consultations with other trained study team members. The two raters will independently rate audio-recordings of the target visit, and then compare ratings and resolve discrepancies by consensus. The final item scores will be added for a summary score ranging from 0 to 20 and a scale score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher total scores imply higher degrees of SDM.
T1 (Immediately after target visit)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Patient-reported shared decision-making
T1 (Immediately after target visit)
Quality of Communication
T1 (Immediately after target visit)
Consultation time
T1 (Immediately after target visit)
Patient involvement in decision-making
T1 (Immediately after target visit)
Decisional conflict
T1 (Immediately after target visit), T2 (3 Months), T3 (6 Months)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Priming Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the priming intervention arm will be provided and are expected to complete the "CKD Jumpstart- Tips" communication priming tool prior to a target clinic visit. Within one week prior to and on the day of the target clinic visit, patients will receive a "CKD Jumpstart- Tips" patient summary sheet which includes a summary of survey responses that can be shared with their healthcare team and tips on communication with clinician during upcoming visit. Clinicians in the priming intervention arm will receive a "CKD Jumpstart- Tips" clinician priming sheet in the patient's medical chart within one week prior to and on the day of the target clinic visit. The priming sheet includes an abstracted version of the patients' survey responses and communication tips tailored to the patient's responses based on Vitaltalk curricular materials.
Usual care arm
NO INTERVENTIONAdditional education classes and information in written or multimedia formats reviewing kidney failure treatment options will be made available per routine care and will not be dictated by the study. Patients will be asked whether they have attended an education session or provided informational materials at baseline.
Interventions
The intervention includes 2 components: 1. Patient Priming: Patients will receive the "Jumpstart CKD- Tips" communication priming tool within 1 week before and on the day of a target clinic visit, which includes surveys on (i) Understanding of illness and possible treatment options, (ii) Readiness for treatment discussion and information preferences, (iii) Health priorities, goals, and preferences (iv) Preferred roles in decision-making. The "Jumpstart CKD- Tips" patient priming sheet includes (a) A summary of their survey responses that can be shared with their healthcare team, and (b) Tips on communication with clinician during upcoming visit. 2. Clinician Priming: Within 1 week before and on the day of the target clinic visit, clinicians will receive a "Jumpstart CKD- Tips" clinician priming sheet which contains (a) An abstracted version of the patients' survey responses and (b) Communication tips tailored to the patient's responses based on Vitaltalk curricula materials.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinicians
- \- Nephrology specialists or higher physician trainees who provide specialty care to older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease
- Patients
- Diagnosis of advanced CKD Stage 4 or 5 (eGRF \<30 ml/min)
- Chinese- or English-speaking
- Identified as patient with whom their clinician plans to discuss advanced kidney disease treatment options in the upcoming clinic visit
- Able to provide written informed consent and complete questionnaires
- Can be contacted by phone
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if they are eligible for kidney transplant, currently on dialysis, or lack decision-making capacity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (27)
Zhou X, Tian X, Fan Y, Sun M, Wang Z, Huang Y, Xiao W. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) in Patients With Advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jan;67(1):e8-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
PMID: 37769823BACKGROUNDXu RH, Zhou LM, Wong EL, Wang D, Chang JH. Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Decision Regret Scale. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 3;11:583574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583574. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33424697BACKGROUNDBrehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256005.
PMID: 12926578BACKGROUNDLam WW, Kwok M, Liao Q, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R. Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the decisional conflict scale in Chinese women making decision for breast cancer surgery. Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):210-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12021. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
PMID: 23167846BACKGROUNDO'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
PMID: 7898294BACKGROUNDElwyn G, Vermunt NPCA. Goal-Based Shared Decision-Making: Developing an Integrated Model. J Patient Exp. 2020 Oct;7(5):688-696. doi: 10.1177/2374373519878604. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
PMID: 33294602BACKGROUNDMcCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK, Rovner D, Nutbeam D, Clayman ML, Kelly-Blake K, Wolf MS, Sheridan SL. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S10. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
PMID: 24624970BACKGROUNDSepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka ME, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE, Thomson R. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S12. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
PMID: 24625035BACKGROUNDDavis JL, Davison SN. Hard choices, better outcomes: a review of shared decision-making and patient decision aids around dialysis initiation and conservative kidney management. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2017 May;26(3):205-213. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000321.
PMID: 28212179BACKGROUNDMorton R. Do Dialysis Decision Aids Improve Treatment Decision-Making? Perit Dial Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):359-61. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00017. No abstract available.
PMID: 27385805BACKGROUNDJungers P, Zingraff J, Albouze G, Chauveau P, Page B, Hannedouche T, Man NK. Late referral to maintenance dialysis: detrimental consequences. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1993;8(10):1089-93.
PMID: 8272221BACKGROUNDHughes SA, Mendelssohn JG, Tobe SW, McFarlane PA, Mendelssohn DC. Factors associated with suboptimal initiation of dialysis despite early nephrologist referral. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Feb;28(2):392-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs431. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PMID: 23222418BACKGROUNDDavison SN. End-of-life care preferences and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Feb;5(2):195-204. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05960809. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
PMID: 20089488BACKGROUNDBerkhout-Byrne N, Gaasbeek A, Mallat MJK, Rabelink TJ, Mooijaart SP, Dekker FW, van Buren M. Regret about the decision to start dialysis: a cross-sectional Dutch national survey. Neth J Med. 2017 Jul;75(6):225-234.
PMID: 28741581BACKGROUNDLadin K, Lin N, Hahn E, Zhang G, Koch-Weser S, Weiner DE. Engagement in decision-making and patient satisfaction: a qualitative study of older patients' perceptions of dialysis initiation and modality decisions. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1394-1401. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw307.
PMID: 27576590BACKGROUNDSong MK, Lin FC, Gilet CA, Arnold RM, Bridgman JC, Ward SE. Patient perspectives on informed decision-making surrounding dialysis initiation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Nov;28(11):2815-23. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft238. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PMID: 23901048BACKGROUNDHussain JA, Flemming K, Murtagh FE, Johnson MJ. Patient and health care professional decision-making to commence and withdraw from renal dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative research. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jul 7;10(7):1201-15. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11091114. Epub 2015 May 5.
PMID: 25943310BACKGROUNDMorton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ. 2010 Jan 19;340:c112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c112.
PMID: 20085970BACKGROUNDVerberne WR, Konijn WS, Prantl K, Dijkers J, Roskam MT, van Delden JJM, Bos WJW. Older patients' experiences with a shared decision-making process on choosing dialysis or conservative care for advanced chronic kidney disease: a survey study. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1423-x.
PMID: 31311511BACKGROUNDFrazier R, Levine S, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Koch-Weser S, Gordon EJ, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Nov;80(5):599-609. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
PMID: 35351579BACKGROUNDWaldron T, Carr T, McMullen L, Westhorp G, Duncan V, Neufeld SM, Bandura LA, Groot G. Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4649-1.
PMID: 31973754BACKGROUNDStiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PMID: 26215573BACKGROUNDGalla JH. Clinical practice guideline on shared decision-making in the appropriate initiation of and withdrawal from dialysis. The Renal Physicians Association and the American Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Jul;11(7):1340-1342. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1171340. No abstract available.
PMID: 10864592BACKGROUNDCheung AK, Chang TI, Cushman WC, Furth SL, Hou FF, Ix JH, Knoll GA, Muntner P, Pecoits-Filho R, Sarnak MJ, Tobe SW, Tomson CRV, Lytvyn L, Craig JC, Tunnicliffe DJ, Howell M, Tonelli M, Cheung M, Earley A, Mann JFE. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2021 Mar;99(3):559-569. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.026.
PMID: 33637203BACKGROUNDJassal SV, Watson D. Dialysis in late life: benefit or burden. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Dec;4(12):2008-12. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04610709. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
PMID: 19965545BACKGROUNDTang SC. CKD prevention: Perspectives in Hong Kong. Nephrology (Carlton). 2018 Oct;23 Suppl 4:72-75. doi: 10.1111/nep.13468.
PMID: 30298664BACKGROUNDXie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Li T, Maddukuri G, Tsai CY, Floyd T, Al-Aly Z. Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int. 2018 Sep;94(3):567-581. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PMID: 30078514BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacqueline KY Yuen, Dr
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The statistical analyst will be blinded to site and arm assignment.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2025
First Posted
January 29, 2025
Study Start
February 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared in order to protect patient privacy. However, summary data of patients will be shared upon reasonable request to the study's Principal Investigator"