NCT07210944

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the improvement effects of the rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy group with the rTMS combined with scalp acupuncture and conventional rehabilitation therapy group. Through statistical analysis of the results obtained from functional near-infrared spectroscopy technology during task states, the investigators elucidate the neuroregulatory mechanism of scalp acupuncture combined with rTMS in improving upper limb motor function in stroke patients under MEP localization, and provide evidence for a more optimal rehabilitation program for post-stroke upper limb motor dysfunction.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
13mo left

Started Dec 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress28%
Dec 2025May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 5, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 5, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2027

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Conventional rehabilitation therapyScalp AcupunctureUpper LimbRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationMotor Disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Maximum amplitude of motor evoked potential

    It refers to the potential difference between the peak and trough of the motor evoked potential, reflecting the excitability of the cerebral cortex and neural pathways. It is detected using an RD-CCY type TMS stimulator in conjunction with a Viking Quest 4-channel surface electromyography recorder from the American company Neuropad.

    One day before treatment, four weeks after treatment

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremities

    It is a widely used standardized assessment tool in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. The FMA divides upper limb motor function into multiple dimensions, including reflex activity, coordinated movement, isolated movement, wrist and hand function, through systematic scoring items. A total of 33 items are included. Each item is scored on a 3-point scale (0-2 points), with a total score of 66 (upper limb part). Higher scores indicate better recovery of upper limb motor function.

    One day before treatment, four weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Action Research Arm Test

    One day before treatment, four weeks after treatment

  • Modified Barthel Index

    One day before treatment, four weeks after treatment

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy

    One day before treatment, two weeks after treatment, four weeks after treatment

Study Arms (2)

control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Repeat transcranial magnetic stimulation and conventional treatment

Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationCombination Product: Conventional rehabilitation treatment

experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Repeat transcranial magnetic stimulation and scalp acupuncture and conventional treatment

Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationProcedure: Scalp acupunctureCombination Product: Conventional rehabilitation treatment

Interventions

Transcranial magnetic stimulation applied a figure-8 coil to the premotor area at 80%-100% of the healthy-side MEP threshold. Treatment lasted 20 min in two phases: weeks 1-2 on the ipsilateral M1 (1Hz, 10s on/5s off), and weeks 3-4 on the contralateral M1 (10Hz, 3s on/12s off). Treat once a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.

control groupexperimental group

Scalp acupuncture selected bilateral upper-limb cortical MEP points (2 points total). The healthy-side hot spot was identified first; if the affected side had no MEP, its mirror point was used. Needles were inserted from point A (affected) to B (healthy) and beyond along the AB line. After insertion, needles were rotated for 2-3 min, manipulated every 10 min, and retained for 30 min. Treat once a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.

experimental group

Conventional drug therapy included secondary stroke prevention, neurotrophy, and improved cerebral circulation. Routine rehabilitation involved exercise, occupational, and physical therapies, with a total daily treatment time of 90 minutes.

control groupexperimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for stroke (symptoms and signs, imaging indicators, etc.), and are independently diagnosed by two deputy chief physicians
  • Age 18-70 years old, first episode, duration 1-6 months
  • The diagnostic criteria for upper limb dysfunction align with the Brunnstrom staging system: patients in Brunnstrom stages II to IV. Stage II: patients exhibit associative responses and can perform coordinated movements, with minimal voluntary movements; Stage III: patients show voluntary coordinated movements, such as grasping with the hand but not extending; Stage IV: patients can perform isolated movements, such as pinching with the hand and limited extension
  • No severe visual or hearing impairment, able to cooperate with relevant assessments and tests
  • The score of the Mini-Mental State Examination is ≥20 points
  • Vital signs are stable, with no signs of progressive neurological symptoms
  • The patient or legal guardian agrees and signs the informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe visual impairment, hemispatial neglect, body image disorder
  • Individuals who cannot undergo rTMS treatment due to reasons such as metal implants, cardiac pacemakers, or skull defects
  • Previous history of brain tumor, brain trauma, epilepsy, and risk of epileptic seizures
  • Any other factors that affect assessment and treatment
  • Dysfunction of limb movement caused by other reasons (such as trauma, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMotor Disorders

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
resident physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2025

First Posted

October 7, 2025

Study Start

December 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 5, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2027

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations