Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Synchronized with Motor Task Training for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
TMS
Closed - Loop Neuromodulation of Post - Stroke Motor Dysfunction by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Synchronized with Specific Motor Task Training
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trials is to investigate the effectiveness of individualized online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in enhancing upper limb motor rehabilitation during the subacute and chronic phase of stroke. It will also learn about the safety of individualized online rTMS intervention methods. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does rTMS synchronized with motor training improve motor rehabilitation in patients with the ability to induce motor evoked potentials(MEPs)? Dose individualized rTMS synchronized with motor training improve motor rehabilitation in patients without the ability to induce MEPs? Researchers will compare online rTMS to offline and sham stimulation in patients with MEPs to see if online rTMS works to alleviate motor dysfunction in preliminary trials. And compare individualized online rTMS to non-individualized online rTMS and sham in patients without MEPs to see if individualized online rTMS works to alleviate motor dysfunction in Randomized, double-blinded, and controlled trials. Participants will: randomized to one group acoording to the MEP condition of each person; receive rTMS treatment for 10 days, with 5 working days per week for a total of two weeks; receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) evaluations before and after the entire treatment; conduct scales and MEP assessment one day before the treatment, as well as one day, one month, and three months after the treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 27, 2025
February 1, 2025
12 months
February 19, 2025
February 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is the upper limb motor domain includes items assessing movement, coordination, and reflex action of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, hand. It ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal motor performance).
Baseline; Day 1 After 2-week intervention; Day 30 after 2-week intervention; Day 60 after 2-week intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Baseline; Day 1 After 2-week intervention; Day 30 after 2-week intervention; Day 60 after 2-week intervention
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Baseline; Day 1 After 2-week intervention; Day 30 after 2-week intervention; Day 60 after 2-week intervention
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) - Resting Motor Threshold (RMT)
Baseline; Day 1 After 2-week intervention; Day 30 after 2-week intervention; Day 60 after 2-week intervention
The average completion time for baseline tasks
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 during TMS intervention
Study Arms (3)
online rTMS
EXPERIMENTALIn the online stimulation group, the TMS treatment will continuously adjust the TMS parameters according to the baseline data and the data changes during the treatment to achieve personalized intervention. When patients receive TMS treatment, it is combined with upper limb movement tasks. When the task starts autonomously, TMS stimulation is triggered through electromyographic feedback. When the task stops or is completed, the TMS stimulation also stops immediately according to the electromyographic feedback, achieving real - time effects.
offline rTMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the offline stimulation group, TMS treatment will be carried out before the task starts. After the stimulation ends, the subjects will then complete the task.
sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORPatients in the sham group also receive sham stimulation treatment combined with specific tasks, which is the same as the online stimulation group, except that the TMS stimulation is sham stimulation.
Interventions
5 Hz rTMS is applied to the MRI-localized hotspot on the affected hemisphere when the patients are performing motor tasks
The patients perform motor tasks after 5 Hz rTMS applied to the MRI-guided hotspot on the affected hemisphere
Sham rTMS is applied to the M1 on the affected hemisphere when the patients are performing motor tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient is first diagnosed with stroke through neurological examination, CT or MRI scan.
- The vital signs are stable and there is a certain degree of upper limb motor dysfunction.
- The age is between 20 and 80 years old.
- The cognitive ability is not significantly affected and the patient can cooperate with various examinations and assessments, with a MMSE score ≥ 20 points.
- There are no serious complications (such as pneumonia, heart failure, urinary tract infection or malnutrition).
- There is no pathological condition that is a contraindication for TMS in the medical history (for example, patients with metal in the brain, such as aneurysm clips, patients with a cardiac pacemaker, pregnant women, or those with a history of epileptic seizures).
- The patient or guardian agrees to sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe heart, lung, liver, kidney diseases and malignant tumors;
- Those with a history of aphasia, severe cognitive impairment or mental illness;
- Patients who have had a history of epileptic seizures in the last month or are taking anti-epileptic drugs recently;
- Those with severe visual or hearing impairments, unable to communicate normally;
- People with metal implants, pacemakers, skull defects or other conditions that prevent them from undergoing TMS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Naval Medical University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200021, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2025
First Posted
February 27, 2025
Study Start
July 2, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Access Criteria
- Authorized professional researchers, including but not limited to researchers engaged in neuroscience research who have obtained data access permission from their affiliated institutions, and clinical doctors from other medical institutions that have a cooperative relationship with this study and have signed data confidentiality agreements. They can access the detailed clinical medical histories of the participants, including past disease histories and treatment process records; neurological function assessment scale data; as well as imaging data collected during the study, such as brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. However, sensitive information related to participants' privacy, such as names, ID numbers, and contact information, will be strictly anonymized to ensure that such information cannot be obtained. They can contact the corresponding author or the first author via email.
The investigators will share the demographic information and baseline clinical data of all participants.