Pleurodesis in Small-bore Chest Tube
How Small Is Small - Pleurodesis in Small-Bore Chest Tube
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) imposes a high burden on the healthcare system in the Asian Pacific region, as lung and breast cancer are the commonest cancers associated with malignant pleural effusion, as the two commonest cancers in the Asian Pacific region. While indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), a catheter that is inserted for long-term drainage of pleural fluid, is not commonly used in Asian countries, small-bore chest tubes are increasingly used due to their ease of insertion and causing less pain. Injecting talc, a chemocal, to promote adhesion of pleura, called talc pleurodesis was an effective method of managing MPE. However, the optimal size of small-bore chest tubes and the feasibility of talc pleurodesis have not been thoroughly investigated. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and success rate of pleurodesis using small-bore chest drains and to examine the outcomes associated with different sizes of these drains, namely 8 Fr, 12 Fr, and 14 Fr, in managing MPE. The primary outcome is the feasibility of talc pleurodesis with different small-bore chest tubes. Secondary outcomes include the differences in recurrence rates post-pleurodesis between small-bore and ultra-small-bore chest tubes, as well as patient outcomes such as pain scores, SpO2/FiO2 ratios (oxygen saturation/fractional inspired oxygen ratio), and complications. The sample size will be 60, and the project will be carried out over one year. The outcome of this study can serve as a reference for managing MPE regarding the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ultra-small-bore chest tubes worldwide, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, where IPC is less common.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2029
December 24, 2025
August 1, 2025
12 months
August 27, 2025
December 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with functional chest tubes after talc pleurodesis in each group
Drainage tube blockage was one of the most common complications for small bore chest tube drainage. While small-bore chest tubes were reported to have similar efficiency for talc pleurodesis, the feasibility of different sizes of small-bore chest tubes i.e. functional chest tubes after talc pleurodesis was not investigated. There is no randomised controlled trial of the feasibility of 8Fr chest tubes compared to other sizes ≤14 Fr. Number of patients with functional chest tube after talc pleurodesis in each group, defined as the chest tube able to drain fluid and air after talc pleurodesis, i.e. not obstructed, is the primary outcome of this study.
1 year
Study Arms (3)
14 Fr chest tube
EXPERIMENTAL14Fr chest tube will be inserted
12 Fr chest tube
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12Fr chest tube will be inserted
8 Fr chest tube
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8Fr chest tube will be inserted
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pleural effusion.
- With clinical indications for pleural drainage and chest drain insertion.
- With anticipated need for pleurodesis e.g. known malignancy, no clinical signs of pleural infection.
- age ≥18 year-old
You may not qualify if:
- Pleural effusion not sizable for drainage.
- With clinical suspicion of pleural infection e.g. pleuritic chest pain, fever, ultrasound showed loculated pleural effusion
- Age ≤18 year-old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, China
Related Publications (4)
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338RESULTGonnelli F, Hassan W, Bonifazi M, Pinelli V, Bedawi EO, Porcel JM, Rahman NM, Mei F. Malignant pleural effusion: current understanding and therapeutic approach. Respir Res. 2024 Jan 19;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02684-7.
PMID: 38243259RESULTKreisman H, Wolkove N, Finkelstein HS, Cohen C, Margolese R, Frank H. Breast cancer and thoracic metastases: review of 119 patients. Thorax. 1983 Mar;38(3):175-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.3.175.
PMID: 6857580RESULTWeichselbaum R, Marck A, Hellman S. Pathogenesis of pleural effusion in carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1977 Sep-Oct;2(9-10):963-5. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(77)90195-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 591413RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
King Pui Florence Chan, MD
The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2025
First Posted
October 6, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2029
Last Updated
December 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
According to the current ethics approval protocol, the IPD will be stored anonymously and destroyed 3 years after completion of study.