Manometry vs Clinical Assessment in the Detection of Trapped Lung in Patients With Suspected Pleural Malignancy
MASCOT
1 other identifier
observational
65
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Malignant pleural effusion is a common clinical problem with median survival of approximately 6 months thus efficient management of Malignant pleural effusion is important. In patients with a Trapped Lung, pleurodesis will be unsuccessful and an indwelling pleural catheter should be inserted instead. Accurate detection of Trapped Lung prior to insertion would avoid futile attempts at talc pleurodesis, re-intervention following failed pleurodesis and allow adequate time to plan for an indwelling pleural catheter insertion.Pleural manometry allows direct and objective measurement of intra-pleural pressure during pleural fluid aspiration.The primary aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of digital pleural manometry to clinical judgment, prior to and during local anaesthetic thoracoscopy, results in a clinically meaningful improvement in Trapped Lung detection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedJune 21, 2016
June 1, 2016
9 months
June 15, 2016
June 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pleural Elastance
Pleural elastance (change in pleural pressure divided by change in pleural volume), where trapped lung will be predicted by pleural elastance ≥ 14.5 cm pleural pressure.
Single visit per subject
Clinical judgement
The clinical judgment of the Thoracoscopist as to the presence or absence of Trapped Lung
Single visit per subject
Trapped Lung
Occurrence of trapped lung, defined as incomplete lung re-expansion on the pre-discharge chest radiograph after local anaesthetic thoracoscopy
Single visit per subject
Secondary Outcomes (1)
PEL-VOUT Agreement
Single visit per subject
Study Arms (1)
Pleural Effusion
Malignant pleural effusion patients requiring investigation with thoracoscopy.
Interventions
Measurement of intra-pleural pressure and the removal of pleural fluid.
Subject lies a long tunnel shaped scanner and images are recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with pleural effusion requiring further investigation with thoracoscopy.
You may qualify if:
- Informed written consent
- Suspected pleural malignancy requiring investigation by local anaesthetic thoracoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Any contra-indication to local anaesthetic thoracoscopy
- Predicted pleural aspiration volume \< 1 litre, as defined by a maximum pleural fluid depth of \< 4 cm on thoracic ultrasound pre-aspiration
- Known contra-indication to MRI
- Previous attempt at talc pleurodesis
- Pregnancy
- Renal impairment (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clydelead
- Rocket Medical plccollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2016
First Posted
June 17, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Published results will not personally identify study subjects.