Study Stopped
difficult recruitment encountered during pandemic
Comparing Different Sizes of Small-bore Chest Drains in Malignant Pleural Effusion
Clinical Efficacy and Complications of Small-bore Versus Ultra-small Bore Chest Drain in Malignant Pleural Effusion: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a very common medical condition, especially among patients with disseminated cancers. Chest drain insertion aims to drain the pleural fluid collection and relieve dyspnea. Small bore chest tubes are recommended as the first line therapy for draining pleural effusions. However, there is no clinical data available to inform on the size of drains for better drainage. This is a randomized study comparing the two common bores of small bore chest drains in Hong Kong, and assess for its clinical efficacy and complication risks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2024
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
November 1, 2023
3.7 years
December 1, 2020
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with drainage success by day 5 of chest drain
Drain success is defined by achieving nearly complete drainage through chest-x ray or ultrasound
Day 5 of chest drain insertion
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain assessed by visual analogue scale ( score from 1 to 10 )when drain is in-situ
Day 5 of chest drain insertion
Change in dyspnea assessed by visual analogue scale for dyspnea ( score from 1 to 10 )
Day 5 of chest drain insertion
Rate of complications during and after insertion
Day 5 of chest drain insertion
Study Arms (2)
Seldinger chest drain 14F
OTHERPatients with seldinger chest drain 14F inserted
Seldinger chest drain 8F
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with seldinger chest drain 8F inserted
Interventions
Different sizes of chest drain will be inserted with seldinger technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have cytologically/histologically proven pleural malignancy, or who have pleural effusion in the context of malignancy elsewhere
- The pleural effusion is at least moderate to massive and causes symptoms
- Ability to give informed written consent to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years old
- Bleeding tendency not readily correctable (platelet \< 100 x 10\^9, INR ≥1.5 after transfusion)
- Hydropneumothorax before drain insertion
- Moderate-heavy septations in the pleural effusion (defined as a collection with more than 4 septations visible at the maximally septated area)
- Clinical emergency that an urgent chest drain is required
- Allergy to local anesthesia agents
- Blindness
- History of pleurodesis on the same side of malignant pleural effusion requiring drainage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (5)
Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii61-76. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137026. No abstract available.
PMID: 20696688BACKGROUNDRahman NM, Pepperell J, Rehal S, Saba T, Tang A, Ali N, West A, Hettiarachchi G, Mukherjee D, Samuel J, Bentley A, Dowson L, Miles J, Ryan CF, Yoneda KY, Chauhan A, Corcoran JP, Psallidas I, Wrightson JM, Hallifax R, Davies HE, Lee YC, Dobson M, Hedley EL, Seaton D, Russell N, Chapman M, McFadyen BM, Shaw RA, Davies RJ, Maskell NA, Nunn AJ, Miller RF. Effect of Opioids vs NSAIDs and Larger vs Smaller Chest Tube Size on Pain Control and Pleurodesis Efficacy Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The TIME1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Dec 22-29;314(24):2641-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16840.
PMID: 26720026BACKGROUNDParulekar W, Di Primio G, Matzinger F, Dennie C, Bociek G. Use of small-bore vs large-bore chest tubes for treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):19-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.19.
PMID: 11451810BACKGROUNDHallifax RJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest Drain Size: the Debate Continues. Curr Pulmonol Rep. 2017;6(1):26-29. doi: 10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
PMID: 28344925BACKGROUNDMishra EK, Corcoran JP, Hallifax RJ, Stradling J, Maskell NA, Rahman NM. Defining the minimal important difference for the visual analogue scale assessing dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusions. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123798. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25874452BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mei Sze Macy Lui, MD
Associate Consultant
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2020
First Posted
December 16, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 30, 2024
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share