The Role of Framing and Choice Architecture in Patients' Reactions and EHR Error Discovery and Reporting
1 other identifier
interventional
3,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The first goal of our research is to understand the effects of different wordings of certain messages on patients' engagement in reviewing their electronic health records (EHRs). These messages will be about EHR errors and their potential consequences, as well as the benefits that might accrue from reviewing EHRs. The second goal is to understand the effects of different wordings of certain messages on patients' discovery and reporting of potential errors in their electronic health records (EHRs). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does focusing on the negative OR positive consequences of EHR errors in the investigator's messages to people, increase their likelihood of reviewing their EHRs?
- 2.Does focusing on the negative OR positive consequences of EHR errors in the investigators' messages to people, increase their likelihood of discovery and reporting of potential errors in their EHRs?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2026
ExpectedMarch 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
5 months
September 18, 2025
March 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reviewing EHRs
Whether or not a subject reviews their EHR
From starting the initial survey through study completion, an average of 20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
EHR error discovery
From starting the initial survey through study completion, an average of 20 minutes
EHR error reporting
From starting the initial survey through study completion, an average of 20 minutes
Study Arms (13)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants in this arm will not receive any message, encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors.
Gain Framing x Egocentric x "Errors"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "errors", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an error in your EHR. This is a great opportunity to act as your own best advocate, check your EHRs to identify any potential errors, and improve your health outcomes."
Loss Framing x Egocentric x "Errors"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "errors", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an error in your EHR. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save yourself from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential error in your EHR."
Gain Framing x Allocentric x "Errors"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "errors", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an error in your EHR. Such errors can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. This is a great opportunity to act in the interest of your loved ones by improving your health outcomes via checking your EHRs to identify any potential errors. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Loss Framing x Allocentric x "Errors"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "errors", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an error in your EHR. Such errors can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save your loved ones from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential error in your EHR. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Gain Framing x Egocentric x "Unintended Mistakes"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "unintended mistakes", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an unintended mistake in your EHR. This is a great opportunity to act as your own best advocate, check your EHRs to identify any potential unintended mistakes, and improve your health outcomes."
Loss Framing x Egocentric x "Unintended Mistakes"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "unintended mistakes", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an unintended mistake in your EHR. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save yourself from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential unintended mistake in your EHR."
Gain Framing x Allocentric x "Unintended Mistakes"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "unintended mistakes", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an unintended mistake in your EHR. Such unintended mistakes can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. This is a great opportunity to act in the interest of your loved ones by improving your health outcomes via checking your EHRs to identify any potential unintended mistakes. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Loss Framing x Allocentric x "Unintended Mistakes"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "unintended mistakes", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an unintended mistake in your EHR. Such unintended mistakes can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save your loved ones from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential unintended mistake in your EHR. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Gain Framing x Egocentric x "Inaccuracies"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "inaccuracies", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an inaccuracy in your EHR. This is a great opportunity to act as your own best advocate, check your EHRs to identify any potential inaccuracies, and improve your health outcomes."
Loss Framing x Egocentric x "Inaccuracies"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "inaccuracies", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an e inaccuracy in your EHR. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save yourself from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential inaccuracy in your EHR."
Gain Framing x Allocentric x "Inaccuracies"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "inaccuracies", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an inaccuracy in your EHR. Such inaccuracies can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. This is a great opportunity to act in the interest of your loved ones by improving your health outcomes via checking your EHRs to identify any potential inaccuracies. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Loss Framing x Allocentric x "Inaccuracies"
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will receive the following message using the term "inaccuracies", encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors: "If you review your medical record, there is a 20% risk of having an inaccuracy in your EHR. Such inaccuracies can also affect those close to us not just ourselves. Taking no action could lead to severe health-related consequences and occasionally be deadly. Act now and save your loved ones from experiencing the preventable negative consequences of having a potential inaccuracy in your EHR. Your loved ones will thank you for prioritizing your safety."
Interventions
The participants will receive different messages using different terms and behavioral framings, encouraging them to review their EHRs and report any potential errors. These wording variations are expected to induce variance in subjects' behaviors with regard to the likelihood of reviewing EHRs, as well as discovering and reporting potential errors in them.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects should have access to their patient portal
- Subjects should have checked their EHR in the past 12 months
You may not qualify if:
- Not having access to their patient portal
- Not having checked their EHR in the past 12 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Texas at Dallaslead
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas
Richardson, Texas, 75080, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan Raimi, PhD
The University of Texas at Dallas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Information Systems
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2025
First Posted
October 3, 2025
Study Start
November 26, 2025
Primary Completion
April 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 10, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Start Date: 6 months after publication of the primary results End Date: 2 years after publication
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, nonprofit organizations, or government agencies will be eligible to request access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documentation (including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, and analytic code). Access will be granted to researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal outlining the intended use of the data. Proposals will be reviewed by the study's principal investigators to assess scientific merit, alignment with ethical standards, and feasibility. Approved researchers will be required to sign a data use agreement to ensure responsible handling of the data and protection of participant confidentiality. Upon approval, data and supporting materials will be shared via a secure online repository or encrypted file transfer.
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this study-after de-identification-will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. This includes participant survey responses and relevant metadata (e.g., time stamps, completion status), but will exclude any personally identifying information. Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and for a period of 2 years. Requests must include a methodologically sound proposal and will be reviewed by the study investigators. Approved requests will require a data use agreement to ensure responsible use and protection of participant privacy. Data will be shared via a secure data repository or encrypted file transfer, depending on the nature of the request.