Improving Providers' Decision-Making and Reducing Information Overload Using Information Visualization in EHRs
2 other identifiers
interventional
113
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to test the efficacy of an information visualization dashboard on decision-making using a randomized controlled trial with crossover. This study aims to test the efficacy of using an information visualization dashboard on ICU providers' decision-making, efficiency, and performance compared to their institutional EHR through a randomized control trial with crossover.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 5, 2026
CompletedMay 5, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.9 years
June 30, 2023
March 31, 2026
May 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Time to Task Completion
To assess the amount of time required to make a decision (i.e., complete a task), participants will be asked to find the answers to clinical questions and the average amount of time needed to answer will be reported.
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
Overall Mean Task Scores
To measure performance, participants will be scored on the overall average responses to 8 questions using the following: 0 points for an incorrect response, 0.5 points for a partially correct response, and 1 point for correct responses. Overall mean score for the 8 questions combined is reported.
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
Time to Case Completion
To measure efficiency, participants' time to complete a patient case (chart review and tasks) will be recorded and reported in minutes.
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
Number of Clicks Per Case
To measure efficiency, participants' number of mouse clicks to complete case review and tasks will be recorded.
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
Mean Number of Fatigue Instances Per Case
Physiologic fatigue will be measured using an eye tracking device to capture changes in pupil size (which represents cognitive fatigue). A fatigue instance was recorded whenever the participant's pupil diameter dropped below the subject-specific fatigue threshold. For every provider-interface combination, the investigators calculated the mean and standard deviation of these one-second pupil diameter values and defined the subject-specific fatigue threshold as the individual mean minus 1.5 standard deviations.
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
System Usability Scale Survey Score
Perceived satisfaction measured using the System Usability Scale survey. Values range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better). The overall score is reported and ranges from 0 to 100. It is expected to take 2-3 minutes to complete this survey.
Immediately following each intervention, within approximately 2-3 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perceived Workload Score
Immediately following each intervention, within approximately 1-2 minutes
Number of Eye Fixations on Screen
Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes
Study Arms (2)
EHR (Control), then AWARE
EXPERIMENTALIn this hour-long task, participants in this arm will first review and complete tasks using the institutional EHR. Then after an approximate 5 minute rest, participants will then review and complete tasks using AWARE.
AWARE Intervention, then EHR (Control)
EXPERIMENTALIn this hour-long task, participants in this arm will first review and complete tasks using the AWARE intervention. Then after an approximate 5 minute rest, participants will then review and complete tasks using the institutional EHR.
Interventions
AWARE is a platform with a visualization dashboard that sits on top of pre-existing, comprehensive EHR systems. AWARE provides clinical decision support tools for the ICU, Emergency Departments and other critical care areas right at the patient's bedside.
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an electronic version of a patients medical history, that is maintained by the provider over time, and may include all of the key administrative clinical data relevant to that persons care under a particular provider, including demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, vital signs, past medical history, immunizations, laboratory data and radiology reports.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ICU physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs),
- active full time ICU service,
- use an institutional EHR (Epic or Cerner) to deliver care, and
- reads and speaks English;
- Residents
- prior ICU rotation experience,
- use an institutional EHR (Epic or Cerner) to deliver care, and
- reads and speaks English;
You may not qualify if:
- Non-ICU Physicians or APPs,
- residents with no prior ICU experience
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Centercollaborator
- MedStar Healthcollaborator
- National Library of Medicine (NLM)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Related Publications (1)
Khairat S, Morelli J, Boynton MH, Bice T, Gold JA, Carson SS. Investigating Information Visualization to Combat Information Overload in Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 9;14:e74247. doi: 10.2196/74247.
PMID: 40925597DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Saif Khairat, PhD, MPH, FAMIA
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Saif Khairat, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2023
First Posted
July 10, 2023
Study Start
July 24, 2023
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
May 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Results First Posted
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- beginning 12 months after and continuing for 24 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has IRB, IEC, or REB approved methodologically sound proposal and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 12 to 24 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has a methodologically sound proposal, approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.