NCT05937646

Brief Summary

This study aims to test the efficacy of an information visualization dashboard on decision-making using a randomized controlled trial with crossover. This study aims to test the efficacy of using an information visualization dashboard on ICU providers' decision-making, efficiency, and performance compared to their institutional EHR through a randomized control trial with crossover.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2023

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 5, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 30, 2023

Results QC Date

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Visualization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Time to Task Completion

    To assess the amount of time required to make a decision (i.e., complete a task), participants will be asked to find the answers to clinical questions and the average amount of time needed to answer will be reported.

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

  • Overall Mean Task Scores

    To measure performance, participants will be scored on the overall average responses to 8 questions using the following: 0 points for an incorrect response, 0.5 points for a partially correct response, and 1 point for correct responses. Overall mean score for the 8 questions combined is reported.

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

  • Time to Case Completion

    To measure efficiency, participants' time to complete a patient case (chart review and tasks) will be recorded and reported in minutes.

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

  • Number of Clicks Per Case

    To measure efficiency, participants' number of mouse clicks to complete case review and tasks will be recorded.

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

  • Mean Number of Fatigue Instances Per Case

    Physiologic fatigue will be measured using an eye tracking device to capture changes in pupil size (which represents cognitive fatigue). A fatigue instance was recorded whenever the participant's pupil diameter dropped below the subject-specific fatigue threshold. For every provider-interface combination, the investigators calculated the mean and standard deviation of these one-second pupil diameter values and defined the subject-specific fatigue threshold as the individual mean minus 1.5 standard deviations.

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

  • System Usability Scale Survey Score

    Perceived satisfaction measured using the System Usability Scale survey. Values range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better). The overall score is reported and ranges from 0 to 100. It is expected to take 2-3 minutes to complete this survey.

    Immediately following each intervention, within approximately 2-3 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Perceived Workload Score

    Immediately following each intervention, within approximately 1-2 minutes

  • Number of Eye Fixations on Screen

    Duration of Single Usability Session, up to 25 minutes

Study Arms (2)

EHR (Control), then AWARE

EXPERIMENTAL

In this hour-long task, participants in this arm will first review and complete tasks using the institutional EHR. Then after an approximate 5 minute rest, participants will then review and complete tasks using AWARE.

Device: AWAREDevice: Electronic Health Record (EHR)

AWARE Intervention, then EHR (Control)

EXPERIMENTAL

In this hour-long task, participants in this arm will first review and complete tasks using the AWARE intervention. Then after an approximate 5 minute rest, participants will then review and complete tasks using the institutional EHR.

Device: AWAREDevice: Electronic Health Record (EHR)

Interventions

AWAREDEVICE

AWARE is a platform with a visualization dashboard that sits on top of pre-existing, comprehensive EHR systems. AWARE provides clinical decision support tools for the ICU, Emergency Departments and other critical care areas right at the patient's bedside.

AWARE Intervention, then EHR (Control)EHR (Control), then AWARE

An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an electronic version of a patients medical history, that is maintained by the provider over time, and may include all of the key administrative clinical data relevant to that persons care under a particular provider, including demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, vital signs, past medical history, immunizations, laboratory data and radiology reports.

AWARE Intervention, then EHR (Control)EHR (Control), then AWARE

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ICU physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs),
  • active full time ICU service,
  • use an institutional EHR (Epic or Cerner) to deliver care, and
  • reads and speaks English;
  • Residents
  • prior ICU rotation experience,
  • use an institutional EHR (Epic or Cerner) to deliver care, and
  • reads and speaks English;

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-ICU Physicians or APPs,
  • residents with no prior ICU experience

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Khairat S, Morelli J, Boynton MH, Bice T, Gold JA, Carson SS. Investigating Information Visualization to Combat Information Overload in Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 9;14:e74247. doi: 10.2196/74247.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Information Seeking Behavior

Interventions

Electronic Health Records

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CommunicationBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedMedical RecordsRecordsData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Results Point of Contact

Title
Saif Khairat, PhD, MPH, FAMIA
Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Study Officials

  • Saif Khairat, PhD

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to a control or an intervention and then conduct a crossover stage. For example, a participant who is in the control group (EHR) will review two patient cases in the EHR. Then, the participant will review two other patient cases in AWARE (intervention), i.e., the crossover stage. Similarly, a participant who is in the intervention group (AWARE) will review two patient cases in AWARE. Then, the participant will review two other patient cases in the EHR (control), i.e., the crossover stage.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2023

First Posted

July 10, 2023

Study Start

July 24, 2023

Primary Completion

May 30, 2025

Study Completion

May 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Results First Posted

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 12 to 24 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has a methodologically sound proposal, approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Time Frame
beginning 12 months after and continuing for 24 months following publication
Access Criteria
Investigator has IRB, IEC, or REB approved methodologically sound proposal and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Locations