#AWARE.HIV Europe: Supporting Healthcare Professionals to Find Undiagnosed HIV in European Hospitals: An Effectiveness-implementation Trial.
#aware hiv
1 other identifier
interventional
5,200
10 countries
28
Brief Summary
The #aware.hiv Europe study is a real-world, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized, effectiveness-implementation trial designed to evaluate whether the introduction of dedicated HIV teams in hospitals can improve HIV testing rates among patients presenting with HIV indicator conditions across ten European countries. Study Design: The study employs a stepped-wedge design, whereby clusters of hospitals transition sequentially from a control phase (routine care) to an intervention phase. All patient data are collected retrospectively from routine care, while prospective data are gathered at the healthcare professional level. The project spans four years and involves hospitals from the Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Romania, Poland, and Ukraine. This design allows for comparison of HIV testing rates and related outcomes before and after the implementation across different settings and time points. Intervention: The core intervention involves the establishment of hospital-based HIV teams. Each team is led by an HIV specialist and supported by nurses and data collectors. Their responsibilities include: Identification and Surveillance: Screening routine electronic health records for HIV indicator conditions using predefined ICD-10 codes and verifying cases that warrant HIV testing. Audit \& Feedback: Providing targeted recommendations to treating physicians when an HIV test is indicated but has not been performed, thereby prompting action. Education \& Training: Delivering training sessions to healthcare professionals to improve their knowledge and attitudes towards HIV testing, prevention, and care. Enabling Environment: Implementing digital solutions and other support mechanisms to streamline testing processes, reduce stigma, and enhance overall guideline adherence. Linkage to prevention: Improving linkage to the locally available preventive services. The intervention is intended to integrate seamlessly into routine hospital care, thereby reinforcing existing guidelines while addressing the current diagnostic testing gap. Endpoints and Outcome Measures: Primary Endpoint: The change in HIV testing rate among patients diagnosed with HIV indicator conditions before and after the implementation of HIV teams. Key Secondary Endpoints: The change in the incidence of new HIV diagnoses among patients with HIV indicator conditions. Variations in HIV testing rates across different countries, medical specialties, and types of indicator conditions, as well as over time. Assessment of the cascade of HIV diagnosis, including the proportion of patients identified with an indicator condition, the offer and acceptance of HIV testing, and documented reasons for non-testing. Evaluation of the cascade of HIV care and prevention, including linkage to HIV care, achievement of viral suppression, and referral and uptake of preventive services. Changes in healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and levels of stigma towards HIV. Implementation outcomes such as fidelity of HIV team activities, resource utilization, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of the intervention. Analysis of contextual factors, barriers, and facilitators impacting the implementation process, using established frameworks like CFIR and RE-AIM. Impact: By introducing HIV teams and systematically monitoring their effect on HIV testing practices, the study aims to enhance early HIV diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. The findings will contribute to evidence-based guidelines and may promote the adoption of similar interventions across European healthcare settings, ultimately reducing HIV-associated morbidity, mortality, and transmission rates. This project not only addresses a critical diagnostic gap in HIV care but also provides valuable insights into the effective implementation of complex interventions in routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2030
March 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.5 years
February 24, 2025
March 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
HIV testing rate in patients with HIV indicator conditions
Proportion of patients diagnosed with an HIV indicator condition who receive an HIV test, compared between the control and implementation phases.
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
Secondary Outcomes (21)
HIV incidence in patients with HIV indicator conditions
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
Subgroup analysis 1: HIV testing rate by country and region
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
Subgroup analysis 2: HIV testing rate by HIV indicator condition
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
Subgroup analysis 3: HIV testing rate by medical specialty
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
Subgroup analysis 4: HIV testing rate over time
Comparison between 1 year of implementation and a control phase lasting between 6 to 18 months, depending on the site's randomization in the stepped-wedge trial design.
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
hiv team implemented
EXPERIMENTALA local hiv team will be implemented in a certain hospital. This will result in different activities, with a focus on: * audit and feedback (reminding health care professionals to test for hiv) * stigma reduction (raising awareness on existing hiv stigma towards hiv) * education (increasing knowledge on hiv among health care professionals) * linkage to prevention and care (improving pathways for hiv care and prevention)
Interventions
A local hiv team will be implemented in a certain hospital. This will result in different activities, with a focus on: * audit and feedback (reminding health care professionals to test for hiv) * stigma reduction (raising awareness on existing hiv stigma towards hiv) * education (increasing knowledge on hiv among health care professionals) * linkage to prevention and care (improving pathways for hiv care and prevention)
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Standard of care: HIV testing for HIV indicator conditions should be part of routine care in the country, and any prevailing guidelines on HIV testing and prevention policies can be integrated.
- Management approval: Hospital management must be willing to allocate resources and provide authorization for the proposed activities, including Surveillance, Audit \& Feedback, Education \& Training, Linkage to Prevention, and fostering an Enabling Environment, including stigma reduction.
- Resources: Assembling an HIV team led by a local HIV expert should be viable considering the available human resources.
- Data collection: There should be an IT specialist and IT infrastructure capable of flagging a pre-defined set of HIV indicator conditions and monitoring the project's implementation effects with feedback loops to healthcare professionals.
- Quality assurance: Continuous linkage for care and access to antiretroviral therapy must be assured.
- Ethics and Regulatory Compliance: Provision for ethical and regulatory compliance is necessary.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gilead Sciencescollaborator
- Casper Rokxlead
- ViiV Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (28)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, Belgium
European hospital of Marseille
Marseille, 13003, France
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin Tempelhof
Berlin, 12101, Germany
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353, Germany
Cologne University Hospital
Cologne, 50937, Germany
Klinikum der Technischen Universität München (TUM)
München, 81675, Germany
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l
Milan, Italy
L'Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive "L. Spallanzani" IRCCS
Roma, 00149, Italy
Rijnstate ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Netherlands
Stichting Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623EJ, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9713GZ, Netherlands
Stichting Maasstad Ziekenhuis
Rotterdam, 3079DZ, Netherlands
Haga Ziekenhuis
The Hague, Netherlands
SPZZOZ Janów Lubelski
Janów Lubelski, 23-300, Poland
Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony
Kielce, 25-736, Poland
Państwowy Instytut Medyczny MSWiA w Warszawie
Warsaw, 02-507, Poland
Central Military Emergency University Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila"
Bucharest, 010825, Romania
Clinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu"
Bucharest, 011356, Romania
National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals"
Bucharest, 021105, Romania
Fundeni Clinical institute
Bucharest, 022328, Romania
Spitalul Universitar de Urgență București
Bucharest, 050098, Romania
Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III
Madrid, 28029, Spain
Infanta Leonor
Madrid, Spain
La Princesa
Madrid, Spain
Central city clinical hospital of Ivano-Frankivsk city council
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Lviv National Medical University
Lviv, 79010, Ukraine
Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, United Kingdom
Royal Free London
London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Jordans CCE, Vliegenthart-Jongbloed K, Osbak KK, Hanssen JLJ, van Beek J, Vriesde M, van Holten N, Dorama W, van der Sluis D, de Steenwinkel J, van Kampen J, Verbon A, Roukens AHE, Rokx C. Implementing HIV teams sustainably improves HIV indicator condition testing rates in hospitals in the Netherlands: the #aware.hiv clinical trial. AIDS. 2025 Jul 1;39(8):995-1004. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004167. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
PMID: 40053486BACKGROUNDJordans CCE, Vliegenthart-Jongbloed KJ, van Bruggen AW, van Holten N, van Beek JEA, Vriesde M, van der Sluis D, Verbon A, Roukens AHE, Stutterheim SE, Rokx C. Unmasking Individual and Institutional HIV Stigma in Hospitals: Perspectives of Dutch Healthcare Providers. AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):3184-3195. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04404-0. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
PMID: 38869755BACKGROUNDVliegenthart-Jongbloed KJ, Vasylyev M, Jordans CCE, Bernardino JI, Nozza S, Psomas CK, Voit F, Barber TJ, Skrzat-Klapaczynska A, Sandulescu O, Rokx C; #aware.hiv Europe Project. Systematic Review: Strategies for Improving HIV Testing and Detection Rates in European Hospitals. Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 25;12(2):254. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020254.
PMID: 38399659BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Casper Rokx, Infectiologist, associate prof
Erasmus Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Klaske J Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, Internist-Infectiologist, DTMH
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Internist-infectiologist, Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2025
First Posted
March 28, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2030
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
While aggregated results may be published, the protocol does not support the sharing of individual-level data.